Your browser does not support the PubReader view.
Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.
The Korean Association for the Study of English Language and Linguistics
[ Article ]
Korea Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 17, No. 4, pp.817-837
ISSN: 1598-1398 (Print)
Print publication date 31 Dec 2017
Received Oct 2017 Revised Nov 2017 Accepted Dec 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.17.4.201712.817

한국인 영어 학습자의 관계대명사 사용에 관한 코퍼스 기반 연구

이경은 ; 신정아
동국대학교, Tel: 010) 9577-3284 10nara26@hanmail.net
동국대학교, Tel: 02) 2260-3167 jashin@dongguk.edu

Correspondence to: Tel: 02-2260-3167, Email: jashin@dongguk.edu Contributed by footnote: 논문은 제1저자의 석사학위논문의 자료를 바탕으로 수정 보완하여 작성한 것임

Abstract

Lee, Kyung Eun and Shin, Jeong-Ah. 2017. A corpus-based study on the use of relative pronouns by Korean learners of English.Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics 17-4, 817-837. This study examined the use of relative pronouns, who and which (subdivided into restrictive and non-restrictive clauses), by high school learners and college freshman learners of English in Korea in terms of their frequency and errors displayed in their writings. Then, the frequency rates found were compared with those of high school English textbooks. The corpus analyses showed that in writing, high school learners tend to overuse the which-clauses with many grammatical errors in comparison to college freshman learners. However, corpora from both learner groups revealed a significant overuse of restrictive relative clauses compared to the textbook corpus, while their use of non-restrictive relative clauses was rarely shown. These results were discussed in terms of Keenan and Comrie’s (1977) Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy and learners’ avoidance (Kleinmann, 1977)

Keywords:

L2 learner corpus, frequency, errors, relative pronouns, restrictive, non-restrictive

참고문헌

  • 고광윤·백주현(Goh, G.-Y. and J.-H. Baek). 2010. 한국 대입영어시험 어휘의 코퍼스 분석(A corpus-based analysis of the vocabulary used in the CSAT English exam and two analogous tests). ≪영어학연구≫(English Language and Linguistics) 16, 1-26.
  • 고미숙(Ko, M.-S.). 2007. 한국 고등학교 학생들의 관계절 습득에 관한연구(The study on Korean EFL high school students' acquisition of relative clauses). ≪교과교육학연구≫(Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction) 11, 57-75.
  • 김남국(Kim, N.-G.). 2014. 한국 대학생들의 영어 관계대명사 습득 양상(A study on the acquisition of the English relative pronoun by Korean college students). ≪영어영문학≫(The Journal of Mirae English Language & Literature) 19-4, 181-207.
  • 김태희(Kim, T.). 2009. 한국 고등학교 학생들의 영어관계절 습득(The acquisition of English relative clauses by Korean high school students). 이화여자대학교 대학원 영어영문학과 석사학위논문 (Unpublished master’s thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea).
  • 김효은(Kim, H.-E.). 2007. 코퍼스 언어학적 접근법에 의한 고등학교 영어교과서의 관계대명사 분석(A corpus-based analysis of uses of relative pronouns in high school English textbooks). 동아대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문(Unpublished master’s thesis, Dong-a University, Busan, Korea).
  • 이권창(Lee, K.-C.). 2014. 한국 고등학교 학습자의 영어 관계절 구문 습득 양상 연구: 유형별 난이도 위계와 오류 분석(A study on the acquisition of English relative clause constructions by Korean high school learners: The difficulty order of the relative clause types and error analysis). 한국교원대학교 대학원 석사학위논문(Unpublished master’s thesis, Korea National University of Education, Cheongju, Korea).
  • 이석재·정채관(Lee, S.-C. and C. K. Chung). 2014. 한국 예비 대학생의 영어 사용 특성 파악을 위한 대규모 공개 영어 학습자 코퍼스 구축 및 분석(Compilation of the Yonsei English Learner Corpus (YELC) 2011 and Its Use for Understanding Current Usage of English by KoreanPre-university Students). ≪한국콘텐츠학회논문지≫(The Journal of the Korea Contents Association) 14-11,1019-1029..
  • 이은주(Lee, E.-J.). 2009. 한국인 영어 학습자 코퍼스를 활용한 정형화된 연결어구 분석(A corpus-based study of the Korean EFL learners’ use of formulaic sequences). ≪외국어교육≫(Foreign Languages Education) 16-2, 321-340.
  • 이은주(Lee, E.-J.), 2010. 한국 대학생 영어 학습자 코퍼스에 나타난 견지 부사구 (Stance Adverbials)의 사용(The use of stance adverbials in the Korean EFL college students' writing corpus). ≪외국어교육≫(Foreign Languages Education) 17-3, 347-366..
  • 이정은·김동규(Lee, J.-E. and D. Kim). 2013. 영어 어휘 연구 최근 동향 분석: 2000 년 이후 학술지 논문을 바탕으로(A synthesis of current research on English vocabulary in Korea: A content analysis of journal articles from 2000 to 2011). ≪외국어교육≫ (Foreign Languages Education) 20-3, 113-140.
  • 장진임(Jang, J. I.). 2011. 고등학교 영어교과서에 나타나는 관계절에 대한연구(A corpus-based analysis of the uses of relative pronouns in high school English textbooks). 부경대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문(Unpublished master’s thesis, Pukyong National University of Education, Busan, Korea).
  • 한나래·이수화(Han, N.-R. and S.-H. Lee). 2009. 학습자 코퍼스를 이용한 영어 전치사 오류 교정 모델 개발(Developing a model for English preposition errors using a learner corpus). ≪언어학≫ (Journal of the Linguistic Society of Korea) 53, 163-185.
  • Anthony, L. 2004. AntConc: A learner and classroom friendly, multi-platform corpus analysis toolkit. Proceedings of IWLeL, 7-13.
  • Celce-Murcia, M., D. Larsen-Freeman and H. A. Williams. 1983. The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher's Course. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
  • Doughty, C. 1991. Second language instruction does make a difference. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13(4), 431-469. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100010287]
  • Dunning, T. 1993. Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics 19(1), 61-74.
  • Hamilton, R. L. 1994. Is implicational generalization unidirectional and maximal? Evidence from relativization instruction in a second language. Language Learning 44(1), 123-157. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01451.x]
  • Izumi, S. 2003. Processing difficulty in comprehension and production of relative clauses by learners of English as a second language. Language Learning 53(2), 285-323. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00218]
  • Keenan, E. L. and B. Comrie. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8(1), 63-99.
  • Kleinmann, H. H. 1977. Avoidance behavior in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning 27(1), 93-107. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1977.tb00294.x]
  • Kuno, S. 1974. The position of relative clauses and conjunctions.Linguistic Inquiry 5(1), 117-136..
  • Leech, G. 1993. 100 million words of English. English Today 9(1), 9-15. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078400006854]
  • O'Grady, W. (1987). Principles of Grammar and Learning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • O’Grady, W. (1999). Toward a new nativism. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21, 621-633. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199004040]
  • Rayson, P. and R. Garside. 2000. Comparing corpora using frequency profiling. Proceedings of the Workshop on Comparing Corpora, 1-6.
  • Sheldon, A. 1974. The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13(3), 272-281. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80064-2]
  • Shin, J.-A. 2011. Overpassivization errors in Korean college students’ English writings. Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics 27(3), 255-273.