Your browser does not support the PubReader view.
Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.
The Korean Association for the Study of English Language and Linguistics
[ Article ]
Korea Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 21, No. 0, pp.226-246
ISSN: 1598-1398 (Print) 2586-7474 (Online)
Print publication date 31 Jan 2021
Received 15 Feb 2021 Revised 14 Mar 2021 Accepted 25 Mar 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.21..202103.226

Authorial References in Single-Author Research Articles of L2 English Student Writers and L1 English Authors

Yeon Hee Choi
Professor, Dept. of English Education, Ewha Womans Univ, Tel: 02-3277-2655 yhchoi@ewha.ac.kr


© 2021 KASELL All rights reserved
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The current study aims to explore to what extent L2 English student writers make their authorial presence explicit or implicit, using personal and impersonal authorial references in Applied Linguistics single-author research articles (RAs) throughout the whole RA or across article sections, compared to L1 English expert writers. The study constructed an L2 English corpus of 33 RAs written by Korean postgraduates and an L1 English corpus of 25 RAs written by L1 English scholars. It analyzed the frequency of four types of personal or impersonal authorial references in the two corpora: first-person singular and plural pronouns, their-person NPs and inanimate NPs. The results of the study revealed predominant use of inanimate NPs, abstract rhetors, in the two corpora; yet, author group variations were also noted from underuse of first-person singular and plural pronouns, overuse of third-person NPs, and less section-specific use of authorial references in the L2 English student writer corpus; and from preferred choice of specific impersonal self-reference expressions between the corpora. The findings from the study suggest not only the influence of impersonal written discourse style but also that of L2 English student writers’ native language, culture and literacy practice, and their status in the academic community and publication context, on their authorial references.

Keywords:

authorial reference, authorial presence, self-reference, personal, impersonal, explicit, implicit, research articles, L1 English, L2 English, student writers

References

  • Back, J. 2014. A corpus-based study of interactional metadiscourse in L1 and L2 academic research articles: Writer identity and reader engagement. The Journal of Linguistic Science 70, 213-236.
  • Bennett, K. 2009. English academic style manuals: A survey. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 8, 43-54. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.12.003]
  • Can, T. and H. Cangır. 2019. A corpus-assisted comparative analysis of self-mention markers in doctoral dissertations of literary studies written in Turkey and the UK. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 42, 1-14. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100796]
  • Chang, Y. Y. and J. Swales. 1999. Informal elements in English academic writing: Threats or opportunities for advanced non-native speakers. In C. N. Candlin and K. Hyland, eds., Writing: Texts, Processes and Practices, 145-167. London: Longman. [https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315840390-8]
  • Chen, R. 2020. Single author self-reference: Identity construction and pragmatic competence. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 45, 203-214. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100856]
  • de Chazal, E. 2014. English for Academic Purposes. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Dontcheva-Navrátilová, O. 2013. Authorial presence in academic discourse: Functions of author-reference pronouns. Linguistica Pragensia 1, 9-30.
  • Flowerdew, L. 2001. Attitudes of journal editors to nonnative speaker contributions. TESOL Quarterly 35, 121-150. [https://doi.org/10.2307/3587862]
  • Harwood, N. 2005. ‘Nowhere has anyone attempted … In this article I aim to do just that’: A corpus based study of self-promotional I and we in academic writing across four disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics 37, 1207-1231. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.012]
  • Hinkel, E. 2002. Second Language Writers’ Text. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. [https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410602848]
  • Hyland, K. 1996. Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied Linguistics 17, 433-454. [https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.4.433]
  • Hyland, K. 1998. Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.54]
  • Hyland, K. 2001. Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes 20, 207-226. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00012-0]
  • Hyland, K. 2002. Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics 34, 1091-1112. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00035-8]
  • Hyland, K. 2005. Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies 7, 173-192. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365]
  • Hyland, K. and F. Jiang. 2017. Is academic writing becoming more informal? English for Specific Purposes 45, 40-51. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.09.001]
  • Ivanič, R. 1998. Writing and Identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. [https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.5]
  • Ivanič, R. and D. Camps. 2001. I am how I sound: Voice as self-representation in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 10, 3-33. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00034-0]
  • Jasim Al-Shujairi. 2018. What, which and where: Examining self-mention markers in ISI and Iraqi local research articles in applied linguistics. Asian Englishes 22(1), 20-34. [https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2018.1544699]
  • Kafes, H. 2017. The use of authorial self-mention words in academic writing. International Journal of Language Academy 5, 165-180. [https://doi.org/10.18033/ijla.3532]
  • Kang, B. M. 1999. Korean Text Genres and Linguistic Features. Seoul: Korea University Press.
  • Khedri, M. 2016. Are we visible? An interdisciplinary data-based study of self-mention in research articles. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 52, 403-430. [https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2016-0017]
  • Khedri, M. and K. Kritsis. 2020. How do we make ourselves heard in the writing of a research article? A study of authorial references in four disciplines. Australian Journal of Linguistics 40, 194-217. [https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2020.1753011]
  • Kuhi, D., M. Tofigh and R. Babaie. 2013. Writers’ self-representation in academic writing: The case of computer engineering research articles by English versus Iranian writers. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning 2(3), 35-48. [https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2012.164]
  • Kuo, C. H. 1999. The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles. English for Specific Purposes 18, 121-138. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00058-6]
  • Lee. Y. 2007. The construction of identity with ‘I’: Writer identity in EFL writing through the first person pronoun. English Teaching 62(4), 373-390. [https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.62.4.200712.373]
  • Lee, Y.-J. 2014. A study on the ‘authorial self-mention’ of journal articles in Korean. Research on Writing 20, 231-266.
  • Luan, J. and Y. Zhang. 2016. A comparative study of the use of first person subject pronouns in Chinese and Swedish students’ argumentative essays: A corpus-based research. International Journal of Education and Research 4(11), 342-352.
  • Luzón, M. J. 2009. The use of we in a learner corpus of reports written by EFL Engineering students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 8, 192-206. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2009.04.001]
  • Martínez, I. 2005. Native and non-native writers’ use of first person pronouns in the different sections of biology research articles in English. Journal of Second Language Writing 14, 174-190. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.06.001]
  • Molino, A. 2010. Personal and impersonal authorial references: A contrastive study of English and Italian Linguistics research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9, 86-101. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.007]
  • Mur-Dueňas, P. 2007. I/we focus on…: a cross-cultural analysis of self-mentions in business management research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6, 143-162. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2007.05.002]
  • Park, N. 2012. Genre-based teaching approach for education of academic writing. Journal of Korean Language Education 23(3), 55-94. [https://doi.org/10.18209/iakle.2012.23.3.55]
  • Rundblad, G. 2007. Impersonal, general, and social: The use of metonymy versus passive voice in medical discourse. Written Communication 24, 250-277. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088307302946]
  • Sheldon, E. 2009. From one I to another: Discursive construction of self-representation in English and Castilian Spanish research articles. English for Specific Purposes 28, 251-265. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2009.05.001]
  • Sung, M. S. 2015. Effects of author voice writing instruction in EFL writing classes. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics 15(1), 75-106. [https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.15.1.201503.75]
  • Swales, J. 2004. Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524827]
  • Swales, J. M. and C. B. Feak. 2012. Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills (3rd ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press. [https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.2173936]
  • Tang, R. and S. John. 1999. The ‘I’ in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun. English for Specific Purposes 18, 23-39. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00009-5]
  • Thompson, G. 2001. Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader. Applied Linguistics 22, 58-78. [https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.58]
  • Uhm, C. J., J. A. Kim, H. E. Nam and Y. N. Oh. 2009. A comparative analysis of metadiscourse use between native English writer (L1) and Korean English writers (L2) in academic writing. Discourse and Cognition 16(2), 63-90. [https://doi.org/10.15718/discog.2009.16.2.63]
  • Vassileva, I. 1998. Who am I/who are we in academic writing? A contrastive analysis of authorial presence in English, German, French, Russian and Bulgarian. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 8, 163-190. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.1998.tb00128.x]
  • Walková, M. 2018. Author’s self-representation in research articles by Anglophone and Slovak linguists. Discourse and Interaction 11(1), 86-105. [https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2018-1-86]
  • Walková, M. 2019. A three-dimensional model of personal self-mention in research papers. English for Specific Purposes 53, 60-73. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.09.003]
  • Wu, G. and Y. Zhu. 2014. Self-mention and authorial identity construction in English and Chinese research articles: A contrastive study. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 10(2), 133-158. [https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.v10i2.28557]
  • Xia, G. 2018. A cross-disciplinary corpus-based study on English and Chinese native speakers’ use of first-person pronouns in academic English writing. Text & Talk 38, 93-113. [https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2017-0032]