실시간 온라인 수업에서 EFL 대학생의 자기 조절에 대한 사회적 실재감과 교수 실재감의 영향

References

• 강명희⋅김세영⋅강주현(Kang, M-H., S. Kim and J. Kang). 2015. 구글플러스 기반 프로젝트 학습의 성취도에 대한 자기조절학습능력과 교수실재감의 예측력: 인지된 상호작용의 매개효과를 중심으로(Mediating effect of perceived interaction on the predictability of self-regulated learning and teaching presence on Google Plus-based project learning outcomes). ≪평생학습사회≫(Journal of Lifelong Learning Society) 11(2), 275-302.
• 강명희⋅박미순⋅정지윤⋅박효진(Kang, M., M. Park, J. Jung and H. Park). 2009. 웹기반 프로젝트 학습에서 학습자 간 상호작용과 학습실재감이 학습성과에 미치는 영향(The effect of interaction and learning presence on learning outcome in web-based project learning). ≪교육정보미디어연구≫(The Journal of Educational Information and Media) 15(2), 67-85.
• 강명희⋅윤성혜⋅임현진⋅유영란(Kang, M-H., S. Yoon, H. Lim and Y. Yoo). 2012. 메타인지, 인지된 상호작용, 실재감의 웹기반 협력학습 성과 예측력(Identifying predicting power of metacognition, perceived interaction, presence on learning outcomes in web-based collaborative learning). ≪평생학습사회≫(Journal of Lifelong Learning Society) 8(2), 111-130.
• 김대식⋅김정겸⋅정회임(Kim, D., J. Kim and H. Chong). 2011. 대학 원격교육환경에서 학습자의 정의적 특성, 학습실재감, 몰입감, 학습만족도간 구조적 관계 분석(The structural relationship among affective characteristics, learning presence, learning flow, learning satisfaction in distance education). ≪교육정보미디어연구≫(The Journal of Educational Information and Media) 17(1), 133-152.
• 김시원⋅임규연(Kim, S. and K. Lim). 2016. 플립드 러닝(Flipped learning) 환경에서 자기조절, 교수실재감, 인지된 상호작용과 학습성과와의 관계: 인지된 상호작용의 매개효과를 중심으로(Relationships among self-regulation, teaching presence, perceived interaction, and learning outcomes in flipped learning environment: Mediating effects of perceived interaction). ≪교육방법연구≫(The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies) 28(4), 743-766.
• 김유진⋅박주호(Kim, U-J. and J-H. Park). 2012. 사이버대학생의 학습실재감, 학습몰입 및 학업성취도 간의 관계(The relationships among learning presence, learning flow, and academic achievement at the cyber universities). ≪아시아교육연구≫(Asian Journal of Education) 13(3), 143-170.
• 김은지(Kim, E-J.). 2015. 대학 수업에서 학습 몰입과 만족에 영향을 미치는 학습자 내·외적 요인 간의 구조적 관계 탐색(Examining structural relationships among college students internal and external factors for learning engagement and satisfaction). ≪아시아교육연구≫(Asian Journal of Education) 16(3), 107-129.
• 김지심⋅강명희(Kim, J. and M. Kang). 2010. 기업 이러닝에서 학습자가 인식한 교수실재감과 학습실재감, 학습효과의 구조적 관계 규명(Structural relationship among teaching presence, learning presence, and effectiveness of e-Learning in the corporate setting). ≪아시아교육연구≫(Asian Journal of Education) 11(2), 29-56.
• 김지영⋅김은지(Kim, J-Y. and E-J. Kim). 2021. 비대면 수업상황에 대한 대학생의 인식유형 연구-K대학을 중심으로(A study on the types of perceptions on non-face-to-face lectures of university students－Focusing on the case of K University). ≪사고개발≫(The Journal of Thinking Development) 17(1), 31-57.
• 남창우⋅신동민(Nam, C. and D. Shin). 2019. 블렌디드 러닝 수업전략과 플립러닝 수업전략이 대학생의 사회적 실재감과 집단 응집력에 미치는 효과(The effect of blended learning instructional strategies and flipped learning instructional strategies on undergraduate students’ social presence and group cohesion). ≪창의정보문화연구≫(Journal of Creative Information Culture) 5(1), 1-13.
• 마승혜⋅허정경(Mah, S-H. and J-K. Huh). 2020. 코로나19 상황에서 온라인 원격수업 질적 향상을 위한 학습자 인식 조사-통번역 과목 수강 학부생 설문 조사를 중심으로 (An analysis of learners’ perception on on-line distance learning under the Covid-19 pandemic to enhance the quality of the learning-Focusing on a survey on undergraduates in interpreting and translation courses). ≪한국번역학회≫(The Journal of Translation Studies) 21(4), 39-61.
• 오미자(Oh, M.). 2020. K-MOOC 환경에서 자기조절학습, 교수실재감이 인지된 학업성취도에 미치는 영향(The effect of self-regulation learning, teaching presence, and academic achievement in the K-MOOC setting). ≪평생학습사회≫(Journal of Lifelong Learning Society) 16(2), 191-212.
• 박기훈⋅김영민(Park, K. and Y. Kim). 2019. e-Learning 기반 온라인 토론학습의 학습실재감 차이 분석(The difference analysis of learning presence in online discussion learning based on e-Learning). ≪e-비즈니스연구≫(The e-Business Studies) 20(5), 95-109.
• 박혜자(Park, H.). 2020. 비대면 시대 온라인 수업 현황과 발전 방향. ≪KISO 저널≫(KISO Journal) 40, 35-38.
• 유경애(Yoo, K.). 2020. 온라인 교양수업에서 대학생의 학업적 자기효능감, 문제해결능력, 자기주도적 학습능력 비교 분석(A study university student’s academic self-efficacy, problem solving and self-directed learning abilities in on online general education class). ≪교양학연구≫(The Journal of General Education) 13, 33-58.
• 유지은(Yoo, J.). 2020. 비대면 수업에 대한 학생들의 인식과 만족도 연구: A 대학교 기독교교육과 강좌 운영사례를 중심으로(A study on students’ perceptions and satisfaction on online classes: Focused on the cases of A University Christian education courses). ≪한국기독교교육정보학회≫(Korean Society for Christian Education & Information Technology) 67, 277-298.
• 유평준(Yoo, P-J.). 2003. 원격대학원 온라인 수업의 학습참여도, 학업성취도, 및 학습만족에 미치는 학습자 관련 변인(Learner-related factors which have effects on learner participation, learning achievement, and learner satisfaction of online graduate course). ≪교육정보방송연구≫(Korean Association for Educational Information and Broadcasting) 9(4), 229-267.
• 윤필현⋅고민정⋅한주희(Yoon, P., M. Ko and J. Hahn). 2020. 가상회의 앱 기반 온라인 수업환경에서 집단응집력이 학업성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 다수준 분석: 집단효능감의 매개효과를 중심으로(Multi-level analysis of the effect of group cohesion on academic performance in a virtual conference app-based online class environment: Focusing on the mediating effect of group efficacy). ≪경영교육연구≫(Korean Business Education Review) 35(5), 133-165.
• 이경하⋅차지영(Lee, K. and J. Tcha). 2020. 비대면 방식의 세미나/글쓰기 수업 사례 연구-덕성여대를 중심으로(A case study on online seminar/writing classes－Focusing on the case of Duksung Women’s University). ≪리터러시연구≫(The Korean Journal of Literacy Research) 11(5), 61-99.
• 이중근⋅김원종⋅이재겸(Lee, J-G., W. Kim and J. Lee). 2020. 비대면 온라인 강의를 경험한 간호대학생들의 학습동기, 학습몰입 및 학업성취도의 관계(The relationship between learning motivation, learning commitment and academic achievement or nursing students who gave non-face-to-face online lectures). ≪한국산학기술학회 논문지≫(Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society) 21(11), 412-419.
• 최현실(Choi, H.). 2021. 코로나-19로 인한 대학신입생의 비대면 수업 경험에 대한 연구(A study on the non-face-to-face teaching experience of college freshmen due to Covid-19. ≪교양교육연구≫(Korean Journal of General Education) 15(1), 273-286.
• 한형종(Han, H-J.). 2021. 대학 실시간 온라인 교육에서의 상호작용 요소 탐색과 수준 분석(An exploration of interaction factors and analysis on interaction-level of synchronous online education in university). ≪한국콘텐츠학회논문지≫(Journal of the Korea Contents Association) 21(4), 14-25.
• Akyol, Z. 2009. Examining teaching presence, social presence, cognitive presence, satisfaction and learning in online and blended course contexts. Doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
• Akyol, Z. and D. R. Garrison. 2008. The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 12, 3-22. [https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v12i3.66]
• Arbaugh, J. B., M. Cleveland-Innes, S. R. Diaz, D. R. Garrison, P. Ice, J. C. Richardson and K. P. Swan. 2008. Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education 11(3-4), 133-136. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003]
• Archibald, D. 2010. Fostering the development of cognitive presence: Initial findings using the community of inquiry survey instrument. The Internet and Higher Education 13(1-2), 73-74. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.001]
• Bangert, A. W. 2009. Building a validity argument for the community of inquiry survey instrument. The Internet and Higher Education 12(2), 104-111. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.06.001]
• Díaz, S. R., K. Swan, P. Ice and L. Kupczynski. 2010. Student ratings of the importance of survey items, multiplicative factor analysis, and the validity of the community of inquiry survey. The Internet and Higher Education 3(1-2), 22-30. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.11.004]
• Fox, J. 2015. Applied regression analysis and generalized linear models. Sage Publications.
• Garrison, D. R. and Z. Akyol. 2015. Toward the development of a metacognition construct for communities of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education 24, 66-71. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.10.001]
• Garrison, D. R., T. Anderson and W. Archer. 1999. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education 2(2-3), 87-105. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6]
• Garrison, D. R. and J. B. Arbaugh. 2007. Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education 10(3), 157-172. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001]
• Gunawardena, C. N. and F. J. Zittle. 1997. Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer‐mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education 11(3), 8-26. [https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649709526970]
• Heilporn, G. and S. Lakhal. 2020. Investigating the reliability and validity of the community of inquiry framework: An analysis of categories within each presence. Computers & Education 145, 103712. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103712]
• Joo, Y. J., K. Y. Lim and E. K. Kim. 2011. Online university students’ satisfaction and persistence: Examining perceived level of presence, usefulness and ease of use as predictors in a structural model. Computers & Education 57(2), 1654-1664. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.008]
• Kang, M. H., M. J. Kim, H. J. Kim, S. Y. Um and H. Jung. 2010. Investigating the relationship among students' collaboration preference, self-efficacy, interaction and achievement in the web-based collaborative learning. Journal of Educational Research 48(1), 157-180.
• Kizilcec, R. F., M. Pérez-Sanagustín and J. J. Maldonado. 2017. Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in massive open online courses. Computers & Education 104, 18-33. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001]
• Kline, T. 2005. Psychological testing: A practical approach to design and evaluation. Sage Publications. [https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483385693]
• Kwon, K., Y. H. Liu and L. P. Johnson. 2014. Group regulation and social-emotional interactions observed in computer supported collaborative learning: Comparison between good vs. poor collaborators. Computers & Education 78, 185-200. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.004]
• Mohamad, M. M., N. L. Sulaiman, L. C. Sern and K. M. Salleh. 2015. Measuring the validity and reliability of research instruments. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 204, 164-171. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.129]
• Shea, P. and T. Bidjerano. 2010. Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education 55(4), 1721-1731. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.017]
• Shea, P. and T. Bidjerano. 2012. Learning presence as a moderator in the community of inquiry model. Computers & Education 59(2), 316-326. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.011]
• Swan, K. and L. F. Shih. 2005. On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 9(3), 115-136. [https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v9i3.1788]
• Yu, T. and J. C. Richardson. 2015. Examining reliability and validity of a Korean version of the Community of Inquiry instrument using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The Internet and Higher Education 25, 45-52. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.12.004]