Your browser does not support the PubReader view.
Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.
The Korean Association for the Study of English Language and Linguistics
[ Article ]
Korea Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 23, No. 0, pp.1169-1193
ISSN: 1598-1398 (Print) 2586-7474 (Online)
Print publication date 30 Jan 2023
Received 03 Jun 2023 Revised 20 Jul 2023 Accepted 06 Dec 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.23..202312.1169

An Articulatory Study on Consonant Cluster Simplification in L1 Korean and L2 English

Gwanhi Yun
Professor, Department of English Education, Daegu University 201 Daegudae-ro, Gyeongsan Gyeongbuk, 38453, Korea Tel: 053-850-4123 ghyun@daegu.ac.kr


© 2023 KASELL All rights reserved
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The present study aims to investigate to what extent and how consonant cluster simplification occurs in L1 Korean and L2 English coda consonant clusters. To this end, four types of coda clusters, including /lp/ and /lk/ were examined with Korean speakers in two ultrasound imaging experiments. Experiment 1 showed that the variability patterns in the production of coda clusters emerged, including three types of variants for /lk/ (e.g., “partial velar,” “full velar,” and “zero velar” and two types of variants for /lp/ sequences (e.g., /l/-deletion and /p/-deletion). Their realization patterns varied depending on cluster type and individual speakers. “Partial velar” variants, particularly, are indicative of gestural hiding and gestural overlap inducing articulated but inaudible consonant clusters. Experiment 2 demonstrated that no-deletion variants were more dominant than deletion forms, along with hyperarticulation variants for English CC clusters (43% vs. 37% vs 20%). These findings provide support for gradient realizations of /CCC/ clusters in L2 English such as /ptk, ktp, lpt, lkt/, depending on cluster type and L2 speakers. Compared to the production of L1 Korean CCC, “no-deletion” variants were elicited more frequently, showing the exemplars of gestural hiding and gestural overlap.

Keywords:

consonant cluster simplification, Korean, English, deletion, gestural overlap, gestural hiding, coda condition, ultrasound imaging technique

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Daegu University Research Grant, 2022.

References

  • 구현옥(Koo, H.). 2019.『국어음운론의 이해』(Understanding Korean Phonology). 서울: 한국문화사(Seoul: Hankook Munhwasa).
  • 남경완⋅오재혁(Nam, G. and J. Oh). 2009. ‘ㄺ’,’ㄼ’의 발음 실현 양상과 원인 분석(The analysis of the reasons and aspects of pronunciation of ‘lk/lp’). ≪한국어학≫(Korean Linguistics) 40, 123-153.
  • 문양수(Moon, Y.). 2001. 국어의 자음군 단순화 현상-최적성 이론을 중심으로(An optimality-theoretic study on Korean consonant cluster simplification). ≪인문논총≫(Humanities Research) 44, 95-118.
  • 이문규(Lee, M.). 2004.『국어교육을 위한 현대 국어 음운론』(Modern Korean Phonology for Korean Education). 서울: 한국문화사(Seoul: Hankook Munhwasa).
  • 이진호(Lee, J.). 1997. 국어 어간말 자음군과 관련 현상에 대한 통시 음운론(Diachronic phonology on stem-final consonant clusters and their related phenomenon). ≪국어연구≫(Korean Studies) 147. 서울대 국어 연구회(Seoul National University Korean Study Circle).
  • 이호영(Lee, H.). 1996.『국어음성학』(Korean Phonetics). 파주: 태학사(Paju: Taehaksa).
  • 전종호(Jun, J.). 1998. Restrictions on consonant clusters. ≪언어학≫(Linguistics) 23, 189-204. 한국 언어학회(The Linguistic Society of Korea).
  • Ahn, S. 2018. The role of tongue position in laryngeal contrasts: An ultrasound study of English and Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Phonetics 71, 451-467. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.10.003]
  • Articulate Instruments. 2012. Aticulate Assistant Advanced user guide. Version 2.18.
  • Beaton, M. 2016. Revisiting incomplete neutralization: The case of Puerto Rican Spanish. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 22(1), 31-40.
  • Best, C. 1994. The emergence of native-language phonological influence in infants: A perceptual assimilation model. In C. Goodman and H. Nusbaum, eds., The Development of Speech Perception, 167-224. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • Best, C., G. W. McRoberts and E. Goodell. 2001. Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener’s native phonological system. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 109(2), 775-794. [https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1332378]
  • Best, C. T. and M. D. Tyler. 2007. Nonnative and second-language speech perception. Language Learning & Language Teaching 17, 13-34. [https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.17.07bes]
  • Blevins, J. 1995. The syllable in phonological theory. In John A. Goldsmith, ed., The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 206-244. Blackwell Publishers. [https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631201267.1996.00008.x]
  • Braver, A. 2013. Degrees of Incompleteness in Neutralization: Paradigm Uniformity in a Phonetics with Weighted Constraints. Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
  • Browman, C. P. and L. Goldstein. 1992. Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica 49, 155-180. [https://doi.org/10.1159/000261913]
  • Browman, C. P. and L. Goldstein. 1995. Gestural syllable position effects in American English. In F. Bell-Berti and L. J. Raphael, eds., Producing Speech: Contemporary Issues, 19-34. Woodbury, NY: American Institute of Physics.
  • Byrd, D. 1995. C-center revisited. Phonetica 52, 285-306. [https://doi.org/10.1159/000262183]
  • Cho, T. and P. A. Keating. 2001. Articulatory and acoustic studies on domain-initial strengthening in Korean. Journal of Phonetics 29, 155-190. [https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0131]
  • Cho, H. 2002. Base identity and uniform exponence in Korean consonant cluster simplification. The Journal of Studies in Language 18(2), 301-316.
  • Cho, H. 2022. Production of coda obstruent clusters by Korean and English Speakers: Acoustical and dynamic time warping analyses. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics 22, 1443-1464.
  • Clements, N. 1990. The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In J. Kingston and M. Beckman, eds., Papers in Laboratory Phonology 1: Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech, 283-333. New York: Cambridge University Press. [https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627736.017]
  • Clements, N. and S. Keyser. 1983. CV Phonology: A Generative Theory of the Syllable. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Côte, M-H. 2000. Consonant Cluster Phonotactics: A Perceptual Approach. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Davidson, L. 2006. Comparing tongue shapes from ultrasound imaging using smoothing spline analysis of variance. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120(1), 407-415. [https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2205133]
  • Davidson, L. 2006. Phonology, phonetics, or frequency: Influences on the production of non-native sequences. Journal of Phonetics 34(1), 104-137. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2005.03.004]
  • Ellis, L. and W. J. Hardcastle. 2002. Categorical and gradient properties of assimilation in alveolar to velar sequences: Evidence from EPG and EMA data. Journal of Phonetics 30, 373-396. [https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0162]
  • Ernestus, M. 2000. Voice Assimilation and Segment Reduction in Dutch. Doctoral dissertation, Vrije University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Ernestus, M. and N. Warner. 2011. An introduction to reduced pronunciation variants. Journal of Phonetics 39, 253-260. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(11)00055-6]
  • Ernesuts, M., Lahey, M., Verhees, F and R. H. Baayen. 2006. Lexical frequency and voice assimilation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120, 1040-1051. [https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2211548]
  • Flege, J. 1995. Second language speech learning theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange, ed., Speech Perception and Iinguistic Experience, 233-277. Baltimore: York Press.
  • Flege, J. 2002. Interactions between the native and second-language phonetic systems. In P. Burmeister, T. Piske and A. Rohde, eds., An Integrated View of Language Development: Papers in honor of Henning Wode, 217-244. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
  • Gafos, A. 2002. A grammar of gestural coordination. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20, 269-337. [https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014942312445]
  • Gaskell, M. G. 2003. Modelling regressive and progressive effects of assimilation in speech perception. Journal of Phonetics 31, 447-463. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(03)00012-3]
  • Gick, B., D. Pulleyblank, F. Campbell and N. Mutaka. 2006. Low vowels and transparency in Kinande vowel harmony. Phonology 23(1), 1-20. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675706000741]
  • Gierut, J. A. 1999. Syllable onsets: clusters and adjuncts in acquisition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 42(3), 708-726. [https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4203.708]
  • Gnanadesikan, A. 1995. Markedness and faithfulness constraints in child phonology. In R. Kager, J. Pater and W. Zonneveld, eds., Constraints in Phonological Acquisition, 73-108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486418.004]
  • Gow, D. W. 2003. Feature parsing: Feature cue mapping in spoken word recognition. Perception and Psychophysics 65, 575-590. [https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194584]
  • Gu, C. 2002. Smoothing Spline ANOVA Models. Springer. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3683-0]
  • Gu, C. 2014. Smoothing spline ANOVA models: R package gss. Journal of Statistical Software 58, 1-25. [https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v058.i05]
  • Guy, G. 1980. Variation in the group and the individual: the case of final stop deletion. In Labov, William, ed., Locating Language in Time and Space, 1-36. New York: Academic Press.
  • Hogg, R. and C. McCully. 1987. Metrical phonology: A coursebook. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Han, Y. 1992. A study on Chungnam dialects. In Kim, Y. ed., Studies of South and North Korean Dialects, 289-307. Seoul: Gyungwoon Publication.
  • Itô, J. 1986. Syllable Theory in Prosodic Phonology. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.
  • Kang, S. K. and M. Oh. 2004. A contrast-based analysis of consonant cluster simplification in English. Language Research 40(2), 377-395.
  • Kim, C. W. 1973. Gravity in Korean phonology. Language Research 9(2), 274-281.
  • Kim, C. W. 2011. Two undercurrents in Korean phonology. Korean and Culture 10, 269-294.
  • Kim, J. I. and E. Kang. 2021. Phonetic variation of Korean stem-final consonant clusters beginning with a liquid. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology 27(2), 161-192.
  • Kim, J. Y. 2022. Variation in stem-final consonant clusters in Korean nominal inflection. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 7(1), 1-45. [https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.5784]
  • Kirchner, R. 1998. An Effort-Based Approach to Consonant Lenition. Doctoral dissertation, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Kwon, S., T. J. Yoon, S. Oh and J. I. Han. 2023. Variable realization of consonant clusters in Seoul and Gyeongsang Korean. Proceedings of Hanyang International Symposium on Phonetics and Cognitive Sciences of Language 2023, 58-59.
  • Lee, S. 2003. A comparison of cluster realization in first and second language. The Journal of Studies in Language 19(2), 341-357.
  • Li, Y.-S. 2012. Lexical effects in phonemic neutralization in Mandarin Chinese. Paper presented at the 38th Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society. [https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v38i0.3337]
  • Mitterer, H. and M. Ernestus. 2006. Listeners recover /t/s that speakers reduce: Evidence from /t/-lenition in Dutch. Journal of Phonetics 34, 73-103. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2005.03.003]
  • Oh, M-.R. 1993. Neutralization and consonant cluster simplification as coda licensing in Korean. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology 1, 261-275.
  • Park, C. 1993. Studies on Korean phonology II. Wonkwang University Press.
  • Pater, J. and J. Barlow. 2003. Constraint conflict in cluster reduction. Journal of Child Language 30, 487-526. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000903005658]
  • Pigott, G. 1999. At the right edge of words. The Linguistic Review 16(2), 143-185. [https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1999.16.2.143]
  • Roettger, T., B. Winter, S. Grawunder, J. Kirby and M. Grice. 2014. Assessing incomplete neutralization of final devoicing in German. Journal of Phonetics 43, 11-25. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2014.01.002]
  • Simonet, M., M. Rohena-Madrazo and M. Paz. 2008. Preliminary evidence of incomplete neutralization of coda liquids in Puerto Rican Spanish. In L. Colantoni and J. Steele, eds., Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology III, 72-86. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.
  • Steriade, D. 1982. Greek Prosodies and the Nature of Syllabification. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Steriade, D. 2000. Lexical conservatism and the notion base of affixation. Ms., UCLA, Los Angeles.
  • Warner, N., A. Jongman, J. Sereno and R. Kemps. 2004. Incomplete neutralization and other sub-phonemic durational differences in production and perception: Evidence from Dutch. Journal of Phonetics 32(2), 251-276. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(03)00032-9]
  • Wright, S. and P. Kerswill. 1989. Electropalatography in the analysis of connected speech processes. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 3(1), 49-57. [https://doi.org/10.3109/02699208908985270]
  • Yun, G. and J.-H. Sung. 2022. Articulatory variability of phonological rules by Korean EFL and Indian ESL speakers. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics 22, 1465-1493.