Your browser does not support the PubReader view.
Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.
The Korean Association for the Study of English Language and Linguistics
[ Article ]
Korea Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 24, No. 0, pp.1011-1027
ISSN: 1598-1398 (Print) 2586-7474 (Online)
Print publication date 31 Jan 2024
Received 03 Aug 2024 Revised 23 Sep 2024 Accepted 27 Sep 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.24..202409.1011

Production of Lexical and Phrasal Stress by Native Speakers and Korean Learners of English

Hyunah Baek ; Shinsook Lee
(first author) Assistant professor, Department of English Language and Literature Ajou University 206 World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Tel: 031) 219-2838 hyunahbaek@ajou.ac.kr
(corresponding author) Professor, Department of English Language Education Korea University 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Korea, Tel: 02) 3290-2353 leesseng@korea.ac.kr


© 2024 KASELL All rights reserved
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

This study examined how Korean learners of English produce lexical and phrasal stress compared to native English speakers. Forty Korean speakers learning English as a foreign language and 11 native English speakers read aloud sentences designed to elicit contrasts in lexical stress (e.g., súspect as a noun vs. suspéct as a verb) and phrasal stress (príntout as a compound noun vs. print óut as a phrasal verb). Acoustic analysis on the recorded tokens (maximum pitch, maximum intensity, and duration of words and syllables) revealed that the English speakers used duration as the most reliable cue for both lexical and phrasal stress. Intensity was used as another significant cue to lexical stress but not to phrasal stress, and no significant use of F0 was found for either stress type. Korean speakers with higher English proficiency marked the lexical stress contrast more clearly than those with lower English proficiency, mainly by producing the first syllable in nouns longer than in verbs. However, the Korean speakers did not employ any of the three acoustic correlates examined to mark the contrast in phrasal stress, regardless of their proficiency in English. These results are interpreted with relevance to previous findings in the literature, and suggestions are made regarding relevant teaching methods.

Keywords:

lexical stress, phrasal stress, second language prosody, production, acoustic analysis

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the College of Education, Korea University Grant in 2024.

References

  • 전상범(Cheun, S.). 2005. 『영어음성학개론(Introduction to the English Phonetics)』. 서울: 을유문화사(Seoul: Eulyoo Publishing Company).
  • Anderson-Hsieh, J. and K. Koehler. 1988. The effect of foreign accent and speaking rate on native speaker comprehension. Language Learning 38, 561-593. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1988.tb00167.x]
  • Barr, D. J., R. Levy, C. Scheepers and H. J. Tily. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68(3), 255-278. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001]
  • Bates, D., M. Mächler, B. M. Bolker and S. C. Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1), 1-48. [https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01]
  • Boersma, P. and D. Weenink. 2023. Praat: doing phonetics by computer (version 6.0.49) [Computer Software] Available online at http://www.praat.org
  • Celce-Murcia, M., D. M. Brinton and J. M. Goodwin. 2010. Teaching Pronunciation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cole, J. 2015. Prosody in context: a review. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 30(1-2), 1-31. [https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2014.963130]
  • Cooper, N., A. Cutler and R. Wales. 2002. Constraints of lexical stress on lexical access in English: Evidence from native and non-native listeners. Language and Speech 45(3), 207-228. [https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309020450030101]
  • Cutler, A. 2005. Lexical stress. In D. B. Pisoni and R. E. Remez, eds., The Handbook of Speech Perception. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Cutler, A. 2015. Lexical stress in English pronunciation. In M. Reed and J. M. Levis, eds., The Handbook of English Pronunciation. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. [https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118346952.ch6]
  • Dagut, M. and B. Laufer. 1985. Avoidance of phrasal verbs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 7, 73-79. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100005167]
  • Fry, D. B. 1955. Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 27(4), 765-768. [https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1908022]
  • Ganga, R., H. Ge, M. E. Struiksma, V. Yip and A. Chen. 2024. Prosodic processing in sentences with ‘only’ in L2 and L2 English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 46, 478-503. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263124000019]
  • Guion, S. G. 2005. Knowledge of English word stress patterns in early and late Korean-English bilinguals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27, 503-533. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050230]
  • Hahn, L. D. 2004. Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL Quarterly 38(2), 201-223. [https://doi.org/10.2307/3588378]
  • Hewings, M. 2004. Pronunciation Practice Activities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jun, S.-A. 2005. Prosodic typology. In S.-A. Jun, ed., Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, 431-458. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0016]
  • Jun, S.-A. 2014. Prosodic typology: By prominence type, word prosody, and macro-rhythm. In S.-A. Jun, ed., Prosodic Typology II: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, 520-539. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567300.003.0017]
  • Kim, H. and A. Tremblay. 2021. Korean listeners’ processing of suprasegmental lexical contrasts in Korean and English: A cue-based transfer approach. Journal of Phonetics 87, 1-15. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2021.101059]
  • Kim, O. Y. and H.-S. Koo. 2010. A study on the stress realization of English homographic words. Phonetics and Speech Sciences 2(2), 51-60.
  • Koo, J.-Y. 2019. Preference to one-word verbs over phrasal verbs. Korean Journal of Linguistics 44(1), 1-28. [https://doi.org/10.18855/lisoko.2019.44.1.001]
  • Kuznetsova, A., P. B. Brockhoff and R. H. B. Christensen. 2017. lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software 82(13), 1-26. [https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13]
  • Kweon, S.-O. 2006. Avoidance of phrasal verbs by Korean EFL learners. Studies in Modern Grammar 45, 173-197.
  • Ladefoged, P. and K. Johnson. 2015. A Course in Phonetics (7th ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
  • Lee, S.-S. and M.-H. Cho. 2011. An acoustic analysis of stressed and unstressed vowels in English nouns: A cross-language case study. English Language and Linguistics 17(3), 61-88. [https://doi.org/10.17960/ell.2011.17.3.003]
  • Lehiste, I. and G. E. Peterson. 1959. Vowel amplitude and phonemic stress in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 31(4), 428-435. [https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1907729]
  • Lemhöfer, K. and M. Broersma. 2012. Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English. Behavior Research Methods 44(2), 325-343. [https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0146-0]
  • Levis, J. M. and A. O. Silpachai. 2018. Prominence and information structure in pronunciation teaching materials. In Proceedings of the 9th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference, 216-229.
  • Liao, Y. and Y. Fukuyama. 2004. Avoidance of phrasal verbs: The case of Chinese learners of English. Language Learning 54(2), 193-226. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00254.x]
  • Lieberman, P. 1960. Some acoustic correlates of word stress in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 32(4), 451-454. [https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1908095]
  • Lim, S. Y. 2016. Acoustic properties of English vowels between the phrasal verbs and prepositional verbs. Mirae Journal of English Language and Literature 21(1), 319-336.
  • Munro, M. J. and T. M. Derwing. 1995. Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning 45, 73-97. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00963.x]
  • No, G.-H. 1998. Stress placement and phonological competence of L2 learners. English teaching 53(2), 3-19.
  • O’Brien, M. G. 2022. Making the teaching of suprasegmentals accessible. In J. Levis, T. Derwing and S. Sonsaat-Hegelheimer, eds., Second Language Pronunciation: Bridging the Gap Between Research and Teaching, 85-106. New Jersey: Wiley Blackwell. [https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394259663.ch5]
  • Perdomo, M. and E. Kaan. 2021. Prosodic cues in second-language speech processing: A visual world eye-tracking study. Second Language Research 37(2), 349-375. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658319879196]
  • Pierrehumbert, J. B. and J. Hirschberg. 1990. The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In P. R. Cohen, J. Morganand M. E. Pollack, eds., Intentions in Communication, 271-311. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3839.003.0016]
  • R Core Team. 2023. R: A language and environment for statistical computing (version 4.2.1) [Computer software]. Available online at https://www.R-project.org
  • Sardegna, V. and W. Dickerson. 2023. Improving the pronunciation of English polysyllabic words through orthographic word-stress rules. In V. Sardegna and A. Jarosz, eds., English Pronunciation Teaching: Theory, Practice and Research Findings, 81-97. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. [https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800410503-011]
  • Sereno, J., L. Lammers and A. Jongman. 2016. The relative contribution of segments and intonation to the perception of foreign-accented speech. Applied Psycholinguistics 37(2), 303-322. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716414000575]
  • Trofimovich, P. and W. Baker. 2006. Learning second language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28, 1-30. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060013]
  • Yun, G. 2012. Korean EFL learners’ production and perception of English stress differences and word recognition. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics 12(3), 601-631. [https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.12.3.201210.601]
  • Yurtbaşi, M. 2017. Stress placement on phrases and compounds in English. International Online Journal of Primary Education 6(2), 39-46.