
that-Trace Effect in English: Box System and Labeling
© 2025 KASELL All rights reserved
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to account for the asymmetries between subject and object in English wh-movement, topicalization, and wh-in-situ within the framework of Chomsky’s (2024) Box System (BS) and the Labeling Algorithm (LA) (Chomsky 2013, 2015). Building on recent developments in the Minimalist Program, the paper proposes that the (in)accessibility of a matrix phase head C to its goal determines the (un)grammaticality of a wh- or topic element extraction from an embedded clause. When the overt complementizer that inherits ϕ-features and a force feature (subsuming [Q] or [Topic]) to INFL, a <Q, Q> or <Topic, Topic> label is established within the embedded {XP, INFLP} configuration, rendering an embedded wh- or topic element inaccessible to the matrix C. Conversely, in the absence of the overt complementizer that, the embedded wh- and topic element is accessible to the matrix C.
Keywords:
Box System, that-trace effect, (in)accessibility, asymmetry, labelingAcknowledgments
This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF-2023S1A5B5A16079970). We are grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.
References
- Albuhayri, S. 2019. Information Structure in Standard Arabic Verbal Sentences. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
- Aoun, J. and A. Li. 1993. Wh-Elements in Situ: Syntax or LF?. Linguistic Inquiry 24(2), 199-238.
-
Chomsky, N. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130, 33-49.
[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003]
-
Chomsky, N. 2015. Problems of projection: Extensions. In E. Di Domenico, C. Hamann and S. Matteini, eds., Structures, Strategies and Beyond: Studies in Honour of Adriana Belletti, 223, 1-16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
[https://doi.org/10.1075/la.223.01cho]
- Chomsky, N. 2019a. MIT Lectures. Available online at http://whamit.mit.edu/2019/05/06/noam-chomskys-lectures-now-online, .
-
Chomsky, N. 2019b. Some Puzzling Foundational Issues: the Reading Program. Catalan Journal of Linguistics Special Issue, 263-285.
[https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.287]
- Chomsky, N. 2020. The UCLA Lectures. Retrieved from https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/005485, .
- Chomsky, N. 2021. Minimalism: Where are we now, and where can we hope to go. Gengo Kenkyu 160, 1-41.
- Chomsky, N. 2023a. The Miracle Creed and SMT. [Manuscript]. Available online at http://www.icl.keio.ac.jp/news/2023/Miracle%20Creed-SMT%20FINAL%20%2831%29%201-23.pdf
- Chomsky, N. 2023b. Working Toward the Strong Interpretation of SMT. [Online Lecture]. Available online at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6r957AgzDw
- Chomsky, N. 2024b. Miracle Creed and SMT. In M. Greco and D. Mocci, eds., A Cartesian Dream: A Geometrical Account of Syntax, 17-39. Lingbuzz Press.
-
Chomsky, N., T. D. Seely, R. C. Berwick, S. Fong, M. A. C. Huijbregts, H. Kitahara, A. McInnerney and Y. Sugimoto. 2023. Merge and the Strong Minimalist Thesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009343244]
-
Emonds, J. 2004. Unspecified categories as the key to root constructions. In A. Adger, C. de Cat & G. Tsoulas, eds., Peripheries: syntactic edges and their effects. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
[https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-1910-6_4]
-
Hisatsugu, K. and D. Seely. 2025. Simplifications and extensions of the Miracle Creed. Linguistic Variation. https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/lv.00040.kit, .
[https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.00040.kit]
-
Kwon, K.Y. 2025. Form Copy(FC)-Based Approach and Its Consequences. Journal of Language Sciences 32(2), 175-194.
[https://doi.org/10.14384/kals.2025.32.2.175]
- Lasnik, H. and M. Saito. 1993. Move α: Conditions on Its Application and Output. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
- Nakashima, T. 2025. Subject-Object Asymmetries in Box Theory. Tokai English Studies 7, 23-41.
- Perlmutter, D. 1971. Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax. New York, NY.: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
- Pesetsky, D. 1982. Paths and Categories. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
-
Pesetsky, D. 2017. Complementizer-trace effects. In M. Everaert and H. van Riemsdijk, eds., The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax (2nd edition), 1-34. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
[https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom108]
- Romaine, I. 2015. A Phase Approach to Spanish Object Clitics. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California-Los Angeles.
- Seely, T. D. and H. Kitahara. 2025. Simplifications and Extensions of the Miracle Creed. In Andreas Blümel, ed., Special Issue: Language Variation. John Benjamins.
- Shim, J. Y. 2019. Understanding Minimalism in Linguistic Theory. Bucheon, Korea: Bookk press.
-
Sobin, N. 1987. The variable status of Comp-trace phenomena. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5, 33-60.
[https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00161867]