Your browser does not support the PubReader view.
Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.
The Korean Association for the Study of English Language and Linguistics
[ Article ]
Korea Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 21, No. 0, pp.324-340
ISSN: 1598-1398 (Print) 2586-7474 (Online)
Print publication date 31 Jan 2021
Received 08 Mar 2021 Revised 31 Mar 2021 Accepted 15 Apr 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.21..202104.324

Conceptualizing Constructs of English in International Business Workplaces

Gwan-Hyeok Im
Researcher, Soonchunhyang University, Tel: 041-530-1592 hyeok.yim@gmail.com


© 2021 KASELL All rights reserved
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate how English users in international business workplaces use English to communicate with their business partners in Korea-based international business companies. Adopting the Global Communicative Competence, perceptions regarding the necessary abilities in international business workplaces were investigated through semi-structured interviews with 16 informants who were working for international businesses in Korea. Three themes were identified: Communication in business, cultural understanding and business knowhow. The finding of the communication in business illustrates the communication challenges the participants encountered in their workplaces, their coping strategies to deal with the challenges, and important aspects in international businesses they perceived. Furthermore, themes of cultural understanding and business knowhow pertain to other important aspects for successful international businesses such as understanding business partners’ cultures and business manners. It was found that English constructs in international business workplaces had complex dimensions beyond the linguistic capacity for businesses, as linguistic and non-linguistic factors were found. These findings contribute to learning and using English language for international businesses, e.g., understanding different varieties of English accents and using a range of communication strategies.

Keywords:

communication challenges, communicative strategies, English as a lingua franca, Business English as a lingua franca

References

  • Bjørge, A. K. 2010. Conflict or cooperation: The use of backchannelling in ELF negotiations. English for Specific Purposes 29, 191–203. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2009.04.002]
  • Braun, V. and V. Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 77–101. [https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
  • Cogo, A. 2016. “They all take the risk and make the effort”: Intercultural accommodation and multilingualism in a BELF community of practice. In L. Lopriore and E. Grazzi, eds., Intercultural Communication: New Perspectives from ELF, 365–383. Roma: Roma TrE-Press.
  • Ehrenreich, S. 2009. English as a lingua franca in multinational corporations: Exploring business communities of practice. In A. Mauranen and E. Ranta, eds., English as a Lingua Franca: Studies and Findings, 126–151. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Ehrenreich, S. 2010. English as a business lingua franca in a German multinational corporation. Journal of Business Communication 47, 408–431. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943610377303]
  • Elder, C., T. McNamara, H. Kim, J. Pill and T. Sato. 2017. Interrogating the construct of communicative competence in language assessment contexts: What the non-language specialist can tell us. Language and Communication 57, 14–21. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2016.12.005]
  • Evans, S. 2013. Perspectives on the use of English a business lingua franca in Hong Kong. Journal of Business Communication 50(3), 227–252. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943613487073]
  • Firth, A. 1996. The discursive accomplishment of normality: On ‘lingua franca’ English and conversation analysis. Journal of Pragmatics 26, 237–259. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(96)00014-8]
  • Giles, H., J. Coupland and N. Coupland. 1991. Context of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663673]
  • Harding, L. and T. McNamara. 2017. Language assessment: The challenge of ELF. In J. Jenkins, W. Baker and M. J. Dewey, eds., Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca, 570–582. London, UK: Routledge. [https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315717173-46]
  • Henderson, J. K. and L. Louhiala-Salminen. 2011. Does language affect trust in global professional contexts? Perceptions of international business professionals. Rhetoric, Professional Communication, and Globalization 2(1), 15–33.
  • House, J. 2002. Communicating in English as a lingua franca. Eurosla Yearbook 2, 243–261. [https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.2.15hou]
  • House, J. 2003. English as a lingua franca: A threat to multilingualism? Journal of Sociolinguistics 7, 556–578. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2003.00242.x]
  • Im, G.-H. and L. Cheng. The Test of English for International Communication (TOEIC®). Language Testing 36(2), 315–324. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532219828252]
  • Jenkins, J. 2000. The Phonology of English as an International Language: New Models, New Norms, New Goals. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Jenkins, J. 2006. Current perspectives on teaching world Englishes and English as a lingua franca. TESOL Quarterly 40, 157–181. [https://doi.org/10.2307/40264515]
  • Jenkins, J. and C. Leung. 2014. English as a lingua franca. In A. J. Kunnan, ed., The Companion to Language Assessment, 1605–1616. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. [https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118411360.wbcla047]
  • Kankaanranta, A. and L. Louhiala-Salminen. 2013. What language does global business speak?: The concept and development of BELF. Ibérica 26, 17–34.
  • Kankaanranta, A. and W. Lu. 2013. The evolution of English as the business lingua franca: Signs of convergence in Chinese and Finnish professional communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 27(3), 288–307. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651913479919]
  • Kankaanranta, A. and B. Planken. 2010. BELF competence as business knowledge of internationally operating business professionals. Journal of Business Communication 47, 380–407. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943610377301]
  • Louhiala-Salminen, L. 2002. The fly’s perspective: Discourse in the daily routine of a business manager. English for Specific Purposes 21, 211–231. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00036-3]
  • Louhiala-Salminen, L. and M. L. Charles. 2006. English as the lingua franca of international business communication: Whose English? What English? In J. C. Palmer-Silveira, M. F., Ruiz-Garrido and I. Fortanet-Gomez, eds., Intercultural and International Business Communication, 27–54. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
  • Louhiala-Salminen, L. and A. Kankaanranta. 2011. Professional communication in a global business context: The notion of global communicative competence. IEEE Transactions of Professional Communication 54, 244–262. [https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2011.2161844]
  • Louhiala-Salminen, L. and A. Kankaanranta. 2012. Language as an issue in international internal communication: English or local language? If English, what English? Public Relations Review 38, 262–269. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.12.021]
  • Meierkord, C. 2002 ‘Language stripped bare’ or ‘linguistic masala’? Culture in lingua franca conversation. In K. Knapp and C. Meierkord, eds., Lingua Franca Communication, 109–133. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
  • Nielsen, T. H. 2019. Norwegian business professionals’ need for and use of English as a Business Lingua Franca (BELF) in multinational corporations. Journal of Language and Communication in Business 59, 109–122. [https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v59i1.117020]
  • Poncini, G. 2002. Investigating discourse at business meetings with multicultural participation. International Review of Applied Linguistics 40, 345–373. [https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2002.017]
  • Poncini, G. 2007. Communicating within and across professional worlds in an intercultural setting. In G. Garzone and C. Ilie, eds., The Use of English in Institutional and Business Settings. An Intercultural Perspective, 283–312. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
  • Roshid, M. M., S. Webb and R Chowdhury. 2018. English as a business lingua franca: A discursive analysis of business e-mails. International Journal of Business Communication [https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488418808040]
  • Seidlhofer, B. 2001. Closing a conceptual gap: The case for a description of English as a lingua franca. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 11, 133–158. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.00011]
  • Seidlhofer, B. 2011. Understanding English as a Lingua Franca. London, UK: Oxford University Press. [https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0243]
  • Sweeney, E. and Z. Hua. 2010. Accommodating toward your Audience: Do native speakers of English know how to accommodate their communication strategies toward nonnative speakers of English? International Journal of Business Communication 47(4), 477–504. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943610377308]
  • Takino, M. 2020. Power in international business communication and linguistic competence: Analyzing the experiences of nonnative business people who use English as a business lingua franca (BELF). International Journal of Business Communication 57(4), 517–544 [https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488417714222]
  • Widdowson, H. G. 1997. EIL, ESL, EFL: Global issues and local interests. World Englishes 16(1), 135–146. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971X.00054]