The Korean Association for the Study of English Language and Linguistics
[ Article ]
Korea Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 22, No. 0, pp.1199-1219
ISSN: 1598-1398 (Print) 2586-7474 (Online)
Print publication date 31 Jan 2022
Received 02 Sep 2022 Revised 10 Oct 2022 Accepted 30 Oct 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.22..202210.1199

의미 중심 읽기 지도법이 중학생 영어 학습자의 읽기 능력과 읽기 태도에 미치는 영향

김보강 ; 김정은
전북대학교
전북대학교
Differentials effects of meaning- versus form-focused reading on secondary EFL learners’ development of reading ability and reading attitudes
Bo-gang Kim ; Jeong-eun Kim
(1st author) Ph.D. Candidate, Department of English Language and Literature, Jeonbuk National University sekjonge@naver.com
(corresponding author) Associate Professor, Department of English Language and Literature, Jeonbuk National University jek48@jbnu.ac.kr


© 2022 KASELL All rights reserved
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The present study investigated the differential effects of form-focused versus meaning-focused reading on the English foreign language (L2) learners’ development of reading comprehension and reading attitudes (e.g., L2 reading enjoyment and confidence). Thirty secondary L2 learners of English participated in the study, who were then randomly assigned to either a 15-week form-focused reading program or meaning-focused reading program (n=15, respectively). A pre-post repeated design was employed; learners’ reading comprehension was assessed using a standardized reading proficiency measure (i.e., TOSEL Junior) and the reading attitudes were measured using a set of questionnaires. The results found a significant development of English reading comprehension and significant increase in L2 reading enjoyment/confidence for the meaning-focused participants while the effect was non-significant for the form-focused participants. The results are then discussed in relation to the nature of reading comprehension and the characteristics of meaning-focused reading, and the participants’ different perceptions of the two reading programs.

Keywords:

meaning-focused reading, form-focused reading, reading comprehension, reading attitudes, L2 reading enjoyment, L2 reading confidence

References

  • 고은미, 유원호(Ko, E-M. and I. W. Yoo). 2016. 과업중심 교수법에 대한 한국 고등학교 상급 영어 능력 학습자들의 인식 및 태도(Do advanced learners of English in a Korean high school perceive Task-based Instruction to be effective?). ≪중등영어교육≫(Secondary English Education) 9-4, 31-49.
  • 김도형, 박성수(Kim, D and S. Park). 2016. 균형적 접근법 기반 영어지도가 초등학생 영어 문해력 발달에 미치는 효과 연구(The effects of teaching English based on balanced approach on developing literacy abilities of the elementary school students). ≪학습자중심교과교육연구≫(The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction) 16-7, 609-629.
  • 김민형, 김태영(Kim, M-H. and T-Y. Kim). 2020. 수업 방식에 따른 중학교 영어 학습자의 동기와 탈동기: 플립 러닝과 강의식 수업 비교연구(Korean middle school students’ English learning motivation and demotivation: A comparative study of flipped learning and teachercentered instruction). ≪영어교육연구≫(English Language Teaching) 32-1, 57-87.
  • 김학양(Kim, H.). 2002. 고등학교 영어 읽기 지도의 실태에 관한 연구(A Study on Realities of English Reading Instruction in Korean High Schools). 석사학위 논문(Master’s thesis), 전남대학교, 광주.
  • 김혜영, 구재명 (Kim, H. and J. Goo). 2016. 형태중심과 형태초점의 어휘 지도 방법이 우연적인 문법 습득에 미치는 영향(Effects of teaching vocabulary through focus on forms and focus on form instruction on the incidental acquisition of L2 grammar) ≪영어영문학21≫(English21) 29-3, 273-296.
  • 박부남(Park, P.). 2007. 형태초점 과제학습과 의미중심 과제학습에 대한 학습자의 태도(Learner attitude towards a form-focused task and a meaning-focused task). ≪영어영문학21≫(English21) 20-2, 199-224.
  • 박혜진, 민찬규(Park, H. J. and C-K. Min). 2019. 의미망을 활용한 도식화 활동의 영어 독해 학습 효과. ≪학습자중심교과교육연구≫(The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction) 19-14, 1087-1106.
  • 성귀복, 김은주(Seong, G. and E. Kim). 2011. 중·고등학교 영어 교사와 학생들의 과업중심교수(TBI)에 대한 인식 연구(Teachers’ and students’ perception of task-based instruction in middle school and high school English class). ≪중등영어교육≫(Secondary English Education) 4-1, 3-32.
  • 송윤희, 박매란, 조윤경(Song, Y. H., M. R. Park and Y. K. Cho). 2014. 문법 수업유형이 한국 대학생의 영어 동사시제 학습에 미치는 영향(The effects of different types of grammar instruction on Korean college students’ learning of English verb tenses). Studies in English Education 19-2, 283-307.
  • 신충성(Shin, C.). 2015. 고등학교 영어 읽기 수업 실태조사 연구: 읽기 활동의 유형과 지도 방법을 중심으로(An Investigative Study of Second Language Reading Instructions in Korean High School English Class: Focusing on Reading Activity and Instruction Types). 석사학위 논문(Master’s thesis), 중앙대학교, 서울.
  • 이동은, 신상근(Lee, D. and S. K. Shin). 2013. 예측하기 전략훈련이 중학교 영어학습자의 읽기 이해와 읽기 태도에 미치는 효과(The effects of prediction strategy training on English reading comprehension and the attitudes of Korean middle school students). ≪교과교육학 연구≫(Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction), 17-4, 1279-1298.
  • 조윤경(Cho, Y.). 2010. 형태 초점 의사소통 교수법에서 교수모형과 학습자의 학습준비도가 목표문법학습에 미치는 영향(Effects of focus-on-form instruction models and students’ readiness on the learning of a target grammar feature). ≪외국어교육≫(Foreign Languages Education) 17-3, 227-250.
  • 허예은(Huh, Y. E.). 2015. 중고등학교 영어교사의 수업 실태 및 수업에 관한 인식 연구(A Study on the Reality of Middle and High School English Classes and Teachers’ Perception of Classroom Instruction). 석사학위 논문(Master’s thesis), 이화여자대학교, 서울.
  • Doughty, C. and E. Varela. 1998. Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty and J. Williams, eds., Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition, 114-138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Fotos, S. and R. Ellis. 1991. Communicating about grammar: A task-based approach. TESOL Quarterly 25(4), 605-628. [https://doi.org/10.2307/3587079]
  • Hwang, H. J. 2015. Form-focused instruction, learners’ perceptions, and second language acquisition. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society 16(10), 6475-6482. [https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2015.16.10.6475]
  • Laufer, B. 2006. Comparing focus on form and focus on forms in second-language vocabulary learning. Canadian Modern Language Review 63(1), 149-166. [https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.149]
  • Murphy, L. 2005. Attending to form and meaning: the experience of adult distance learners of French, German and Spanish. Language Teaching Research 9(3), 295-317. [https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168805lr160oa]
  • Saeidi, M., E. Zaferanieh and H, Shatery. 2012. On the effects of focus on form, focus on meaning, and focus on forms on learners’ vocabulary learning in ESP context. English Language Teaching 5(10), 72-79. [https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n10p72]
  • Salimi, A., A. Bonyadi and A. Asghari. 2014. The effect of focus on form on EFL learners’ written task accuracy across different proficiency levels. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 4(4), 829-838. [https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.4.829-838]
  • Savignon, S. J. and C. Wang. 2003. Communicative language teaching in EFL contexts: Learner attitudes and perceptions. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 41, 223-249. [https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2003.010]
  • Seong, H-J. and T-E. Kim. 2016. Improvement of recognition and writing of verbs and modal verbs elementary English learners through focus-on-form instruction. Studies in Foreign Language Education 30(2), 21-53. [https://doi.org/10.16933/sfle.2016.30.2.21]
  • Shintani, N. 2015. The incidental grammar acquisition in focus on form and focus on forms instruction for young beginner learners. TESOL Quarterly 49(1), 115-140. [https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.166]
  • So, L. 2019. A case study on focus on form with web content in L2 writing instruction at university students’ level. Studies in Foreign Language Education 33(1), 25-53. [https://doi.org/10.16933/sfle.2019.33.1.25]