A New Type of Secondary Predicate Construction in English
© 2022 KASELL All rights reserved
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
This paper argues that secondary predicate constructions of a kind (e.g., Mary built a house big) share some properties with either resultative or depictive constructions, but at the same time they have a property that resultative and depictive constructions do not possess. This set of grammatical properties suggests that the secondary predicate constructions (called build-big construction in this paper) should belong to a subcategory of both resultative and depictive constructions in the classification of secondary predicate constructions. That is, secondary predicate constructions are not simply divided into resultative and depictive constructions. This is further supported with pseudo-resultative constructions (e.g., Mary braided her hair tight) since they also have some properties that are shared with typical resultative or depictive constructions.
Keywords:
secondary predicate, resultative, depictive, build-big construction, pseudo-resultative, m ultiple inheritanceReferences
- Beavers, J. 2012. Resultative constructions. In Robert I. Binnick, ed., The Oxford Handbook on Tense and Aspect, 908-933. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195381979.013.0032]
- Boas, H. C. 2003. A Constructional Approach to Resultatives. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
- Cormack, A. and N. Smith. 1999. Why are depictives different from resultatives? In UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 11, 251-284.
- Goldberg, A. E. and Ray Jackendoff. 2004. The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language 80(3), 532-568. [https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2004.0129]
- Himmelmann, N. P. and Eva F. S-B. 2006. Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification: The Typology of Depictives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199272266.001.0001]
- Kearns, K. 2007. Telic senses of deadjectival verbs. Lingua 117, 26-66. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.09.002]
- Levinson, L. 2010. Arguments for pseudo-resultative predicates. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28, 135-182. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-010-9089-x]
- Müller, S. 2004. An analysis of depictive secondary predicates in German without discontinuous constituents. In Proceedings of the HPSG-2004 Conference, Center for Computational Linguistics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 202-222, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. [https://doi.org/10.21248/hpsg.2004.12]
- Müller, S. 2008. Depictive secondary predicates in German and English. In C. Schroeder, G. Hentschel and W. Boeder, eds., Secondary Predicates in Eastern European Languages and Beyond, 255-273, Oldenburg: BIS-Verlag.
- Pollard, C. J. and I. A. Sag. 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
- Rappaport Hovav, M. and B. Levin. 2001. An event structure account of English resultatives. Language 77, 766-797. [https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2001.0221]
- Sag, I. A., T. Wasow and E. M. Bender. 2003. Syntactic Theory: A Formal Introduction, 2nd ed. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
- Simpson, J. 1983. Resultatives. In Lori Levin, Malka Rappaport and Annie Zaenen, eds., Papers in Lexical-Functional Grammar, 143-157. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
- Simpson, J. 2005. Depictives in English and Warlpiri. In Nikolaus P. Himmelmann and Eva Schultze-Berndt, eds., Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification: The Typology of Depictives, 69-106, Oxford: Oxford University Press. [https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199272266.003.0002]
- Washio, R. 1997. Resultatives, compositionality and language variation. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6, 1-49. [https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008257704110]
- Wechsler, S. 1997. Resultative predicates and control. In Proceedings of the 1997 Texas Linguistics Society Conference, 307-321. (Texas Linguistic Forum 38.) Austin: University of Texas.