Your browser does not support the PubReader view.
Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.
The Korean Association for the Study of English Language and Linguistics
[ Article ]
Korea Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 23, No. 0, pp.980-993
ISSN: 1598-1398 (Print) 2586-7474 (Online)
Print publication date 30 Jan 2023
Received 09 Sep 2023 Revised 01 Oct 2023 Accepted 04 Nov 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.23..202311.980

Reanalysis and Intervention in English ‘Tough’ Constructions

Myung-Kwan Park
(First author) Professor, Division of English Language and Literature, Dongguk University, Tel: 82-2-2260-8708 parkmk@dongguk.edu


© 2023 KASELL All rights reserved
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

This paper investigates one of the issues most intensively studied for the last decade: intervention in English ‘tough’ constructions. Hartman (2012) observes that an adjunct PP between a ‘tough’ adjective and the following infinitive clause serves as a defective intervenor for the Agree relation between the matrix subject and the null operator in the clause at hand. Showing that an adverbial DP also functions as such an intervenor, Bruening (2014) (and more recently Salzmann (2023)) attributes the offending intervention to the improper licensing of the null operator in the extraposed infinitive clause. On the other hand, Kleine and Poole (2017) and Gluckman (2022) take a semantic approach, arguing that the intervention in question results from type mismatch or improper chain indexing when an adjunct or adverbial PP/DP intervenes. Departing from these studies, this paper argues that the recasting of Chomsky’s (1981) reanalysis combining a ‘tough’ adjective with the following infinitive verb to yield a complex adjective amalgam gives a right handle in accounting for the intervention at issue. Simply, an intervening adjunct or adverbial PP/DP inhibits the formation of a complex adjective amalgam required owing to the absence of functional layers in the ‘tough’ infinitive clause.

Keywords:

'tough’ constructions, intervention, type mismatch, complex adjective, reanalysis

References

  • Bruening, B. 2014. Defects of defective intervention. Linguistic Inquiry 45, 707–719. [https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00171]
  • Cinque, G. 2006. Restructuring and Functional Heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195179545.001.0001]
  • Choe, H.-S. 1987. Restructuring Parameters and Complex Predicates - A Transformational Approach. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
  • Chomsky, N. 1964. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. The Hague: Mouton.
  • Chomsky, N. 1973. Conditions on transformations. In S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky, eds., A Festschrift for Morris Halle, 232–286. New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Chomsky, N. 1977. On ‘wh’-movement. In P. W. Culicover, T. Wasow, and A. Akmajian, eds., Formal Syntax, 77-132. New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
  • Chomsky, N. 1993. A Minimalist program for linguistic theory. In K. Hale and S. J. Keyser, eds., The View from Building 20, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
  • Chomsky, N. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels and J. Uriagereka, eds., Step by Step, 89-155. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Chomsky, N. 2002. On Nature and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gluckman, J. 2017. The syntax and semantics of the ‘tough’-construction. Submitted to a journal, July 2017.
  • Gluckman, J. 2018. Perspectives on Syntactic Dependencies. Doctoral dissertation, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Gluckman, J. 2022. Taking time with the tough-construction. Journal of Linguistics 58(2), 233-268. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S002222672100013X]
  • Goto, S. 2010. On the ‘tough’ construction: event suppression and null operator predication. English American Literature 54, 62-82.
  • Grano, T. 2015. Control and Restructuring. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198703921.001.0001]
  • Hartman, J. 2011. Intervention in tough constructions. In S. Lima, K. Mullin, and B. Smith, eds., Proceedings of the Thirty-ninth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 39), 387-397. Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistics Student Association, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
  • Hartman, J. 2012. (Non-)Intervention in A-movement: Some cross-constructional and cross-linguistic consequences. Linguistic Variation 1(2), 121–148. [https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.11.2.01har]
  • Jackendoff, R. S. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Higginbotham, J. 1985. On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry 16(4), 547-593.
  • Kim, B. 1995. Predication in ‘tough’ constructions. Proceedings of the Fourteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 271–285.
  • Keine, S., and E. Poole. 2017. Intervention in ‘tough’-constructions revisited. Linguistic Review 34(2), 295–329. [https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2017-0003]
  • Kratzer, A. 1995. Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In J. Carlson and F. Pelletier, eds., The Generic Book, 127−175. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lasnik, H., and R. Fiengo. 1974. Complement object deletion. Linguistic Inquiry 5(4), 535-571.
  • Longenbaugh, N. 2016. Rethinking the A/A’-distinction: evidence from English tough-movement. A handout from Generative Linguistics of the Old World 29.
  • Nanni, D. L. 1980. On the surface syntax of constructions with ‘easy’-type adjectives. Language 56(3), 568–581. [https://doi.org/10.2307/414450]
  • Pesetsky, D. (2021). Exfoliation: towards a Derivational Theory of Clause Size. MIT. Unpublished manuscript. from https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/004440, .
  • Poole, E., J. A. Mendia, and S. Keine. 2022. More on (the lack of) reconstruction in English tough-constructions. Linguistic Inquiry. [https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00490]
  • Rezac, M. 2006. On ‘tough’-movement. In C. Boeckx , ed., Minimalist Essays, 288–325. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company. [https://doi.org/10.1075/la.91.19rez]
  • Postal, P. M. 1974. On Raising. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Roberts, I. 1997. Restructuring, head movement, and locality. Linguistic Inquiry 28, 423-460.
  • Salzmann, M. 2023. Experiencer intervention in English ‘tough’ movement: evidence from extraction of the tough adjective against syntactic‐and semantic‐intervention accounts. Syntax 26, 223-249. [https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12250]
  • Wurmbrand, S. 2001. Infinitives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.