The Korean Association for the Study of English Language and Linguistics
[ Article ]
Korea Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 24, No. 0, pp.836-851
ISSN: 1598-1398 (Print) 2586-7474 (Online)
Print publication date 31 Jan 2024
Received 04 Jul 2024 Revised 12 Aug 2024 Accepted 20 Aug 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.24..202408.836

Issues of EPIK (English Program in Korea) and Suggestions for the Enhanced Implementation

Joonwon Lee
Lecturer, Department of English Education Konkuk University 120 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu Seoul, Korea, Tel: +821022787743 akajunee@gmail.com


© 2024 KASELL All rights reserved
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

As a response to the globalization, the Korean government has tried to improve Korean students’ English proficiency by recruiting native English speaking teachers (NEST) through English Program in Korea (EPIK). Although EPIK has been influential, there also has been issues which hinder its effective implementation. Two of the issues often pointed out are about the nationality policy and the qualification of NESTs hired through EPIK. With this background, this study investigated the current nationality status of EPIK teachers which reflects the nationality issue. Also, this study tried to investigate possible solutions for the issues by comparing EPIK with the NEST programs of Japan and Hong Kong. The data gathered revealed that EPIK teachers are mostly from only a few countries, which hinder Korean students from being exposed to diverse English varieties. In addition, comparing the three NEST programs, this study suggested that EPIK should expand the eligible countries for EPIK to expose Korean students to diverse English varieties and should request higher qualification criteria to its effective implementation.

Keywords:

EPIK, English Program in Korea, JET, NET, world Englishes, EIL

References

  • Ahn, H. J. 2014. Researching awareness and attitudes: A study of world Englishes and English teachers in South Korea. Doctoral dissertation, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
  • Ahn, M. 2015. The effect of diverse English accents on Korean high school students’ listening comprehensibility and the attitudes towards World Englishes. Master’s thesis, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
  • Ahn, S and S. Lew. 2017. Native English-speaking teachers (NESTs) in Korea: Voices from two NESTs and one Korean English teacher. Korean Journal of Teacher Education 33(2), 89-119. [https://doi.org/10.14333/KJTE.2017.33.2.89]
  • Alsagoff, L. 2012. Another book on EIL? Heralding the need for new ways of thinking, doing, and being. In L. Alsagoff, S. L. Mckay, G. Hu and W. A. Renandya, eds., Principles and Practices for Teaching English as an International Language, 3-6. New York: Routledge. [https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203819159]
  • Bayyurt, Y. 2018. Issues of intelligibility in world Englishes and EIL contexts. World Englishes 37, 407-415. [https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12327]
  • Bernstein, J. D. 2023. Becoming “TEFL certified”: Professionalization, certification, and commodification in teaching English as a foreign language volunteer tourism. In L. S. Schedel and C. Jakubiak, eds., Voluntourism and Language Learning/teaching: Critical Perspectives, 53-74. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40813-7_3]
  • Boyle, J. 1997. Native-speaker teachers of English in Hong Kong. Language and Education 11(3), 163-181. [https://doi.org/10.1080/09500789708666726]
  • Choi, H.-J and S.-K. Kim. 2013. The effect of native English teachers on high school students’ English performance. Journal of Vocational Education & Training 16(1), 1-19. [https://doi.org/10.36907/krivet.2013.16.1.1]
  • Chun, S. Y. 2015. Native English-speaking teachers and Korean English teachers: A qualitative analysis of Korean university students’ beliefs. Studies in Foreign Language Education 29(3), 181-203. [https://doi.org/10.16933/sfle.2015.29.3.181]
  • Crooks, A. 2001. Professional development and the JET program: Insights and solutions based on the Sendai city program. JALT Journal 23(1), 31-46. [https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTJJ23.1-2]
  • English Program in Korea. 2024. Available online at http://www.epik.go.kr/index.do
  • Floris, F. D and W. A. Renandya. 2020. Promoting the value of non-native English-speaking teachers. Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand 59, 1-19. [https://doi.org/10.58837/CHULA.PASAA.59.1.1]
  • Harding, L. 2008. Accent and academic listening assessment: A study of test-taker perceptions. Melbourne Papers in Language Testing 13(1), 1-33.
  • Holliday, A. 2006. Native-speakerism. ELT Journal 60(4), 385-387. [https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccl030]
  • Hwang, K. and S. Y. Yim. 2019. The negative influence of native-speakerism on the sustainability of linguistic and cultural diversities of localized variants of English: A study of local and expatriate teachers in South Korea. Sustainability 11. [https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236723]
  • Hwang, N. Y., Y. Hwang and K. Kim. 2011. An analysis of the effectiveness of English Program in Korea (EPIK). Korean Journal of Sociology of Education 21(4), 235-262. [https://doi.org/10.32465/ksocio.2011.21.4.009]
  • James, M. A. 2008. The influence of perceptions of task similarity/difference on learning transfer in second language writing. Written Communication 25(1), 76-103. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088307309547]
  • Japan Exchange and Teaching. 2024. Available online at https://jetprogramme.org/en/
  • Jenkins, J. 2006. Current perspectives on teaching world Englishes and English as a lingua franca. TESOL Quarterly 40(1), 157-181. [https://doi.org/10.2307/40264515]
  • Jeon, M. 2009. Globalization and native English speakers in English Programme in Korea (EPIK). Language, Culture and Curriculum 22(3), 231-243. [https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310903388933]
  • Jeon, M. 2020. Native-English speaking teachers’ experiences in East-Asian language programs. System 88. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102178]
  • Kachru, B. B. 1985. Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the Outer Circle. In R. Quirk and H. Widdowson, eds., English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures, 11-30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kang, H. 2015. A study on recognition of utilization policy of native English teachers in Gangwon province. Master’s thesis, Korea National University of Education, Cheongju, Korea.
  • Kang, O., M. Moran and R. Thomson. 2019. The effects of international accents and shared first language on listening comprehension tests. TESOL Quarterly 53(1), 56-81. [https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.463]
  • Kim, D. 2011. The expectations and realities of pre-service elementary school teachers’ toward native speakers of English lecturers. The Journal of Foreign Studies 16, 35-37. [https://doi.org/10.15755/jfs.2011..16.35]
  • Kim, S. 2012. Living as a welcomed outsider: Stories from native English speaker teachers in Korea. Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics 28(2), 27-58. [https://doi.org/10.17154/kjal.2012.06.28.2.27]
  • Kim, K. and C.-H. Lee. 2005. The effects of team teaching on elementary school students’ affective domains and the directions for effective team teaching. Primary English Education 11(2), 133-171.
  • Kim, J.-R. and H. Han. 2009. The effects of co-teaching between English teachers and native assistant teachers on elementary students’ English communicative ability. English Language Teaching 21(3), 183-202. [https://doi.org/10.17936/pkelt.2009.21.3.010]
  • Korean Statistical Information Service. 2024. Total amount of money spent on private education depending on school levels in 2023. Available online at https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1PE003&vw_cd=MT_ZTITLE&list_id=H1_10_003 &scrId=&seqNo=&lang_mode=ko&obj_var_id=&itm_id=&conn_path=MT_ZTITLE&path=%252FstatisticsList%252FstatisticsListIndex.do
  • Lee, H., G. Sung and S. Lee. 2012. A study on satisfaction and the effective use of native English-speaking teachers in Korea. Education and Culture Research 18(3), 73-106. [https://doi.org/10.24159/joec.2012.18.3.73]
  • Lee, H. 2022. A study on the change in the native English-speaking teacher program in Korea: From the historical institutionalist approach. The Journal of Asia TEFL 19(1), 163-179. [https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2022.19.1.10.163]
  • Lee, J., Y. Jeon and K. Kang. 2011. An analysis on the utilization of native English teachers invited to Korea as a means of strengthening public English education. The Journal of Modern British & American Language & Literature 29(2), 115-146.
  • Lee, J. 2020. Preparing Korean EFL learners for English communication with World Englishes and EIL. The Journal of Asia TEFL 17(4), 1310-1322. [https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2020.17.4.10.1310]
  • Lee, J. 2022. Listen to the world: Developing Korean high school EFL learners’ listening comprehension of various accents through learning transfer. Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
  • Lee, J. 2023a. Analysis on the listening comprehension parts of national standardized university entrance exams of three Asian countries. The Journal of Asia TEFL 20(2), 416-424. [https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2023.20.2.12.416]
  • Lee, J. 2023b. Pre-service English teachers’ perception of world Englishes and opinions on teaching listening with various accents of English. Secondary English Education 16(3), 179-209. [https://doi.org/10.20487/kasee.16.3.202308.179]
  • Lee, Y. and J. Ko. 2010. Realities and evaluation of the native English teachers’ program in secondary education in Korea. Humanities Research 28, 39-66.
  • Ma, L. P. F. 2012. Advantages and disadvantages of native- and nonnative-English-speaking teachers: Student perceptions in Hong Kong. TESOL Quarterly 46(2), 280-305. [https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.21]
  • Matsuda, A. 2003. The ownership of English in Japanese secondary schools. World Englishes 22(4), 483-496. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2003.00314.x]
  • Matsuda, A. 2012. Teaching English as an international language. In A. Matsuda, ed. Principles and Practices for Teaching English as an International Language, 1-14. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. [https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847697042-002]
  • Matsuda, A. and P. Friderich. 2012. Selecting an instructional variety for an EIL curriculum. In A. Matsuda, ed. Principles and Practices for Teaching English as an International Language, 17-27. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. [https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847697042-003]
  • Miller, A. J. 2020. A curriculum evaluation of MATESOL degrees and TESOL graduate certificates in the United States. Doctoral dissertation, Mercer University, Macon, GA, USA.
  • Native-speaking English Teachers (NET) Scheme. 2024. Available at https://www.edb.gov.hk/en/curriculum-development/resource-support/net/index.html
  • No, G. 2006. World English and the effective English teacher in elementary schools. Primary English Education 12(1), 1-33.
  • Park, H. 2010. An analysis of native and nonnative English teachers’ perception on their role in elementary school settings of co-teaching. English Language Teaching 22(4), 133-163. [https://doi.org/10.17936/pkelt.2010.22.4.006]
  • Park, T. 2017. A study on secondary school teachers’ opinions about including British pronunciation in English listening assessment. Secondary English Education 10(3), 3-21.
  • Phillipson, R. 1992. Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford University Press.
  • Ploscaru, D. 2024, May. How many people in India speak English? History of English. Available online at https://www.thehistoryofenglish.com/how-many-people-in-india-speak-english
  • Seo, Y. and R. Kubota. 2023. Exploring lived experiences of black female English teachers in South Korea: Understanding travelling intersectionality and subjectivities. Language, Culture and Curriculum 36(1), 21-38. [https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2022.2045303]
  • Sharifian, F. 2009. English as an International Language. Multilingual Matters. [https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691231]
  • Shin, H. W., J. Lee, J. Brawn and J. Do. 2021. EPIK teachers’ beliefs about language learning and teaching process. English Teaching 76(2), 81-105. [https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.76.2.202106.81]
  • Shin, S.-Y., S. Lee, S and R. Lidster. 2021. Examining the effects of different English speech varieties on an L2 academic listening comprehension test at the item level. Language Testing 38(4), 580-601. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532220985432]
  • Tanghe, S. 2014. Integrating world Englishes into a university conversation class in South Korea. English Today 30(2), 18-23. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S026607841400008X]