The Korean Association for the Study of English Language and Linguistics
[ Article ]
Korea Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 24, No. 0, pp.1372-1390
ISSN: 1598-1398 (Print) 2586-7474 (Online)
Print publication date 31 Jan 2024
Received 10 Dec 2024 Revised 18 Dec 2024 Accepted 26 Dec 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.24..202412.1372

Preparing Future Elementary English Educators: Insights from Pre-Service Teachers on Microteaching and Practicum

Seon-Ho Park
Professor, Department of English Education Gyeongin National University of Education 155 Sammak-ro, Manan-gu, Anyang, Gyeonggi-do, Korea shpark@ginue.ac.kr


© 2024 KASELL All rights reserved
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Pre-service teachers majoring in English education are often regarded as well-suited candidates for teaching English in elementary schools. This study explores how these pre-service teachers at a university of education are being prepared, with an emphasis on their perspectives regarding the development of English teaching competence. Written interviews were conducted with four pre-service teachers to explore their experiences with microteaching in the university curriculum, participation in and observation of English lessons during teaching practicums, and reflections on English teaching issues in the elementary teacher selection examination. The data, analyzed using Spradley’s (1980) qualitative analysis method, were categorized into three main themes and sub-themes. The findings reveal that pre-service teachers majoring in English education experience some anxiety regarding their English proficiency but demonstrate moderate confidence in conducting English lessons in elementary schools. Participants expressed generally positive perceptions of their microteaching experiences within university courses and felt slightly better prepared to teach English than their non-English majoring peers. However, they reported limited practical teaching opportunities during teaching practicums, which span 2 to 4 weeks annually over three years, with almost no chances to observe or practice English lessons directly with students. These findings underscore a significant gap in practical teaching experience, even among pre-service teachers specializing in English education. The study calls for universities of education and practicum schools to address this issue by providing more extensive opportunities for microteaching and direct classroom practice, ensuring better preparation for future elementary English educators.

Keywords:

elementary English education, elementary teacher selection examination, microteaching, teaching practicum, pre-service teachers

References

  • Ahn, K. J. 2015. Development and implementation of a process-based English microteaching model for pre-service primary English teacher education. Korean Journal of Elementary Education 26(1), 279-301. [https://doi.org/10.20972/kjee.26.1.201503.279]
  • Allen, D. W. 1966. Micro-teaching: A new framework for in-service education. The High School Journal 49(8), 355-362.
  • Allen, D. W. 1967. Micro-teaching: A Description. Stanford: Stanford University.
  • Amobi, F. A. 2005. Pre-service teachers’ reflectivity on the sequence and consequences of teaching actions in a microteaching experience. Teacher Education Quarterly 32(1), 115-130.
  • Carter,N., D. Bryant-Lukosius,A. DiCenso, J. Blythe and A. J. Neville. 2014. The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545-547. [https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547]
  • Cendani, I. A. S. A. and R. A. Purnamaningwulan. 2023. Exploring challenges of peer feedback in an EFL micro-teaching class. Journal of English Language Studies 5(3), 335-347. [https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v5i3.15651]
  • Chang, K. and S. Lee. 2012. A study on student teachers’ learning to teach through field-based practicum. English Language Teaching 24(2), 241-267.
  • Cho, J.-B. and C. K. Jung. 2024. Developing classroom-friendly teaching models for elementary English AI digital textbooks. Secondary English Education 17(3), 89-104. [https://doi.org/10.20487/kasee.17.3.202406.89]
  • Choi, J. and H. Cho. 2017. A narrative inquiry into elementary teacher candidates’ learning experiences and participation in the qualifying test for teachers. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction 21(4), 398-410. [https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2017.21.4.398]
  • Donnelly, R. and M. Fitzmaurice. 2011. Towards productive reflective practice in microteaching. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 48(3), 335-346. [https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2011.593709]
  • Farrell, T. S. C. 1999. Reflective practice in an EFL teacher development group. System 27(2), 157-172. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00014-7]
  • Goo, J. and Y. Kim. 2022. Pre-service elementary school teachers’ foreign language enjoyment, foreign language anxiety, and foreign language teaching anxiety. Studies in English Education 27(4), 503-532. [https://doi.org/10.22275/SEE.27.4.02]
  • Gregersen, T. and E. K. Horwitz.2004. Language learning and perfectionism: Anxious and non-anxious language learners’ reactions to their own oral performance. The Modern Language Journal 86(4), 562-570. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00161]
  • Haidara, Y. 2016. Psychological factorsaffecting English speaking performance for the English learners in Indonesia. Universal Journal of Educational Research 4(7), 1501-1505. [https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040701]
  • Hawkins, J. E. 2018. The practical utility and suitability of email interviews in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report 23(2), 493-501. [https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3266]
  • Hong, J. S. and J.-r. Kim. 2020. Analysis of learning materials usedin different types of English team teaching. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction 20(8), 103-126. [https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.8.103]
  • Hyeon, K.-h. and K. H. Ko. 2021. A narrative inquiry of three elementary teachers’ professional development: A teacher-researcher’s investigation of English teacher professional growth. Primary English Education 27(4), 203-232. [https://doi.org/10.25231/pee.2021.27.4.203]
  • Jung, K. S. and H. Choi. 2011. Pre-service teachers’ perceptions and current situations of English teaching practice in elementary schools. Primary English Education 17(2), 31-59.
  • Jung, Y. S. 2015. A survey on pre-service elementary English teachers’ perceptions about teacher feedback and peer feedback. Primary English Education 21(4), 199-222.
  • Kang, H. 2019. An analysis for science subject items of elementary school teacher employment examination based on PCK. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 39(5), 585-597.
  • Kim, D. R. 2021. An exploration on pre-service elementary school teachers’science-learning processes according to their motivation types. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education 40(2), 127-144.
  • Kim, D. and K. J. Ahn. 2018. Factors for and against becoming an elementary English subject teacher and suggestions for the English subject teaching system. Korean Journal of Elementary Education 29(3), 19-40. [https://doi.org/10.20972/kjee.29.3.201809.19]
  • Kim, H. J. 2009. An analysis of nonnative English teacher trainees’ foreign language teaching anxiety in reflective microteaching course. English Language & Literature Teaching 15(4), 265-290.
  • Kim, H. J. 2019a. Pre-service elementary school teachers’ foreign language teaching anxiety: With focus on English education majors. The Journal of Modern British & American Language & Literature 37(4), 273-298. [https://doi.org/10.21084/jmball.2019.11.37.4.273]
  • Kim, H. J. 2019b. An analysis of pre-service elementary school teachers’ reflection on their English teaching demonstration. Modern English Education 20(1), 1-13. [https://doi.org/10.18095/mee.2019.20.1.01]
  • Kim, H. J. (2022). Pre-service elementary school teachers’ perception of the effect of English teaching demonstration preparation for the teacher employment examination. Journal of the Korea English Education Society 21(1), 43-68.
  • Kim, J. 2008. The effects of English teaching practicum on preservice teachers’ perception of teaching English in elementary schools. Primary English Education 14(2), 5-22.
  • Kim, J. and S.-Y. Kim. 2004. An investigation into primary school English teacher anxiety. Primary English Education 10(1), 43-66.
  • Kim, M. 2019. A study on the natures and validity of elementary teacher employment examination as an educational evaluation tool. The Journal of Elementary Education 32(1), 37-65. [https://doi.org/10.29096/JEE.32.1.03]
  • Kim, Y. and H. Kim. 2017. Secondary school pre-service teachers’ anxiety on English language learning and teaching. Secondary English Education 10(4), 71-96.
  • Larasaty, G., Nasir and M. Reza. 2022. Perceptions of undergraduate students on the implementation of oral peer-feedback in microteaching classroom. Journal of English Language and Language Teaching 6(2), 152-163.
  • Lee, J. H. 2023. Promise and challenges of AI based English digital textbooks in elementary schools. Secondary English Education 16(4), 51-65. [https://doi.org/10.20487/kasee.16.4.202311.51]
  • Lee, K. and S.-H. Park. 2019. A study on a learning community program for practice teachers’ primary English language curriculum literacy enhancement. Journal of Education & Culture 25(6), 619-639.
  • Lee, S. 2017, An analysis of pre-service primary English teachers’ reflections on their microteaching with the help of video-recording and peer feedback. Journal of English Teaching through Movies and Media 18(1), 233-253. [https://doi.org/10.16875/stem.2017.18.1.233]
  • Lee, S. 2018. The use of video combined with guided reflection for pre-service teachers’ English microteaching. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction 18(4), 431-454.
  • Lee, S.-R. (2020). Pre-service elementary school teachers’ reflection before, during and after their social studies teaching demonstration: Focusing on the development of instructional design competency. Research in Social Studies Education 27(1), 101-117. [https://doi.org/10.37409/RSSE.27.1.101]
  • Lee, W.-K. 2017. A working model of the achievement test system of elementary English. Primary English Education 23(1), 113-136.
  • Lee, Y. E. 2019. The effects of the recognition of collaborative classes between native English speakers and Korean English teachers on the definition factors of the learner. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association 19(8), 572-583.
  • Macy, M., J. K. Squires and E. E. Barton. 2009. Providing optimal opportunities: Structuring practicum experiences in early intervention and early childhood special education preservice programs. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education 28, 209-218. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121408327227]
  • Ostrosky, M. M., C. Mouzourou, N. Danner and H. Y. Zaghlawan. 2013. Improving teacher practices using microteaching: Planful video recording and constructive feedback. Young Exceptional Children 16(1), 16-29. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250612459186]
  • Park, J. 2019. Analysis of science items in elementary teacher employment tests: Focused on questionnaires from 2001 to 2018. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction 19(3), 647-661. [https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2019.19.3.647]
  • Park, S.-H. 2022. Test-takers’ perceptions on the English tests conducted in the second round of the primary teacher employment examination. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics 22, 1512-1537.
  • Park, S.-H. 2023. Pre-service teachers’ perspectives on the second-round English assessment in the elementary teacher recruitment exam. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction 27(6), 596-507.
  • Park, S.-H. and I. Hwang. 2012. Anxieties perceived by students and English teachers in elementary English education. Foreign Languages Education 19(3), 165-200.
  • Park, Y. 2019. An analysis of the English language teaching anxiety of non-native pre-service elementary school teachers in micro-teaching sessions. Primary English Education 25(3), 31-52. [https://doi.org/10.25231/pee.2019.25.3.31]
  • Park, Y. 2023. Relationship analysis of English teaching anxiety and pre-service elementary school teachers. The Journal of Education 43(3), 27-41. [https://doi.org/10.25020/je.2023.43.3.27]
  • Shin, C. H. 2020. A historical review of the primary teacher employment examination: Retrospect and prospect. The Journal of Elementary Education 33(1), 119-138. [https://doi.org/10.29096/JEE.33.1.05]
  • Spradley, J. P. 1980. Participant Observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Yi, J.-y. and Y. Kim. 2011. Multiple evaluations of microteaching in pre-service English teacher training. Foreign Languages Education 18(3), 209-233.
  • Yim, Y.-k. 2019. Study on the reflection of English microteaching and real English class. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction 19(7), 905-923. [https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2019.19.7.905]
  • Zhang, S. and Q. Cheng. 2011.Learning to teach through a practicum-based microteaching model. Action in Teacher Education 33(4), 343-358. [https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2011.620523]