The Korean Association for the Study of English Language and Linguistics
[ Article ]
Korea Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 26, No. 0, pp.329-362
ISSN: 1598-1398 (Print) 2586-7474 (Online)
Print publication date 28 Feb 2026
Received 11 Sep 2025 Revised 12 Jan 2026 Accepted 12 Jan 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.26..202602.329

Speech Rate Effects on the Phonetic Realization of Epenthetic Vowels in English Loanwords in Korean

Hyunjin Lee
Lecturer, Department of Language and Information Pusan National University 2 Busandaehak-ro 63beon-gil, Geumjeong-gu, Busan, Korea, Tel: +82-51-512-0311 hjlee66904@gmail.com


© 2026 KASELL All rights reserved
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

This study investigates the phonetic realization of epenthetic vowels in English loanwords in Korean under different speech rate conditions, based on read speech. Thirty native speakers of Seoul Korean participated in a production experiment in which they read sentences at normal and fast rates. Both epenthetic /ɨ, i/ and their lexical counterparts were analyzed for F1, F2, and duration values. The results revealed that epenthetic and lexical vowels did not differ significantly in their formant values or durations at either speech rate. While vowel durations shortened overall in fast speech, no evidence of centralization was observed for epenthetic and lexical /ɨ/, suggesting that it maintains stable phonetic properties across rates. Gender, syllable position and syllable structure exerted significant effects on vowel duration, but these applied equally to epenthetic and lexical vowels. These findings indicate that epenthetic vowels are fully integrated into the phonological system and function as phonological segments with defined phonetic targets, rather than as transitional vowels in read speech.

Keywords:

English loanwords in Korean, vowel epenthesis, speech rate

Acknowledgments

An earlier version of this work was presented at the Summer 2025 Meeting of the Korean Association of Language Sciences (KALS).

References

  • Agwuele, A., H. Sussman and B. Lindblom. 2008. The effect of speaking rate on consonant vowel coarticulation. Phonetica 65(4), 194-209. [https://doi.org/10.1159/000192792]
  • Albano, E. 1999. A gestural solution for some glide epenthesis problems. In Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1785-1788.
  • Albuquerque, L., R. Valente, A. Teixeira, C. Oliveira and D. Figueiredo. 2021. Age and gender effects in European Portuguese spontaneous speech. Loquens 8(1-2), 1-9. [https://doi.org/10.3989/loquens.2021.077]
  • Bellik, J. A. 2019. The effect of speech style and deaccentuation on vowel intrusion in Turkish complex onsets. In Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 3498-3502.
  • Best, C. and M. Tyler. 2007. Nonnative and second language speech perception. Language Learning & Language Teaching 17, 13-34. [https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.17.07bes]
  • Boersma, P. and D. Weenink. 2024. Praat. Available online at https://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/
  • Bradlow, A. R., N. Kraus and E. Hayes. 2003. Speaking clearly for children with learning disabilities: Sentence perception in noise. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 46(1), 80-97 [https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2003/007)]
  • Cangi, M. E., A. Isildar, A. Tekin and A. B. Sarac. 2020. A preliminary study of normative speech rate values of Turkish speaking adults. ENT Updates 10, 381-389.
  • Choi, S. and J. Jun. 1998. Are Korean fortis and aspirated consonants geminates? Language Research 34(3), 521-546.
  • Cooper, F. S., P. C. Delattre, A. M. Liberman, J. M. Borst and L. J. Gerstman. 1952. Some experiments on the perception of synthetic speech sounds. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 24, 597-606. [https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1906940]
  • Curtis, E. 2002. Moraic structure and segment duration in Korean. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 10, 378-391.
  • Davidson, L. 2006. Phonology, phonetics, or frequency: Influences on the production of non-native sequences. Journal of Phonetics 34(1), 104-137. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2005.03.004]
  • Davidson, L. and M. Stone. 2003. Epenthesis versus gestural mistiming in consonant cluster production: An ultrasound study. In Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 22, 165-178.
  • de Jong, K. and B. A. Zawaydeh. 1999. Stress, duration, and intonation in Arabic word-level prosody. Journal of Phonetics 27(3), 3-22. [https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1998.0088]
  • Duanmu, S. 1996. Pre-juncture lengthening and foot binarity. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 26(1-2), 95-115.
  • Escudero, P., B. Sisinni and M. Grimaldi. 2014. The effect of vowel inventory and acoustic properties in Salento Italian learners of Southern British English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 135(3), 1577-1584. [https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4864477]
  • Fant, G. 1966. A note on vocal tract size factors and non-uniform F-pattern scaling. Speech Transmission Laboratory-Quarterly Progress and Status Report 4, 22-30.
  • Fourakis, M. 1991. Tempo, stress, and vowel reduction in American English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 90(4), 1816-1827. [https://doi.org/10.1121/1.401662]
  • Fowler, C. A. 1981. A relationship between coarticulation and compensatory shortening. Phonetica 38(1-3), 35-50. [https://doi.org/10.1159/000260013]
  • Gay, T. 1978. Effect of speaking rate on vowel formant movements. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 63(1), 223-230. [https://doi.org/10.1121/1.381717]
  • Gouskova, M. and N. Hall. 2009. Acoustics of epenthetic vowels in Lebanese Arabic. In S. Parker, ed., Phonological Argumentation: Essays on Evidence and Motivation, 203-225. London: Equinox.
  • Guenther, F. H. 1995. Speech sound acquisition, coarticulation, and rate effects in a neural network model of speech production. Psychological Review 102(3), 594-621. [https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.102.3.594]
  • Hall, N. 2011. Vowel epenthesis. The Blackwell Companion to Phonology 3, 1-21. [https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0067]
  • Hall, N. 2013. Acoustic differences between lexical and epenthetic vowels in Lebanese Arabic. Journal of Phonetics 41(2), 133-143. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2012.12.001]
  • Hirata, Y. and K. Tsukada. 2003. The effects of speaking rates and vowel length on formant movements in Japanese. In Proceedings of the 2003 Texas Linguistics Society Conference: Coarticulation in Speech Production and Perception, 73-85.
  • Holt, Y. F., E. Jacewicz and R. A. Fox. 2015. Variation in vowel duration among Southern African American English speakers. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 24(3), 460-469. [https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0186]
  • Igeta, T., S. Hiroya and T. Arai. 2017. Overlapping of /o/ and /u/ in modern Seoul Korean: Focusing on speech rate in read speech. Phonetics and Speech Sciences 9(1), 1-7. [https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2017.9.1.001]
  • Jacewicz, E. and R. A. Fox. 2015. Eliciting sociophonetic variation in vowel duration. In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1-5.
  • Jaworski, S. 2009. Inertial and non-inertial lenition processes. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 45(1), 103-129. [https://doi.org/10.2478/v10010-009-0006-6]
  • Kadenge, M. and C. Mudzingwa. 2012. Comparing chiShona loanwords of monolingual and bilingual speakers: An Optimality Theory analysis. South African Journal of African Languages 32(2), 141-151. [https://doi.org/10.2989/SAJAL.2012.32.2.5.1142]
  • Kang, Y. 2003. Perceptual similarity in loanword adaptation: English postvocalic word-final stops in Korean. Phonology 20, 219-273. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675703004524]
  • Kemp, C. 2009. The Exploration of Multilingualism. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • Kent, R. D. and C. Read. 2002. The Acoustic Analysis of Speech. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.
  • Kerdpol, K. 2012. Formant transitions as effective cues to differentiate the places of articulation of Ban Pa La-u Sgaw Karen nasals. Journal of Humanities Regular 15(2), 21-38. [https://doi.org/10.1163/26659077-01502002]
  • Kim, H. 2009. The phonology and phonetics of unaccentable vowels in Kyungsang Korean. Paper presented in the Japanese/Korean Linguistics 18.
  • Kim, K. and A. Kochetov. 2011. Phonology and phonetics of epenthetic vowels in loanwords: Experimental evidence from Korean. Lingua 121(3), 511-532. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.10.012]
  • Kim, S. 2009. A preliminary study on the relationship between speech rate and prosodic unit generation in Korean read speech. EONEOHAG 53, 225-254.
  • Klatt, D. H. 1976. Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 59(5), 1208-1221. [https://doi.org/10.1121/1.380986]
  • Koopmans-van Beinum, F. 1980. Vowel Contrast Reduction: An Acoustic and Perceptual Study of Dutch Vowels in Various Speech Conditions. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • LaCharité, D. and C. Paradis. 2005. Category preservation and proximity versus phonetic approximation in loanword adaptation. Linguistic Inquiry 36(2), 223-258. [https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389053710666]
  • Laver, J. 1994. Principles of phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166621]
  • Lee, K. and I. Jin. 2016. A study of durations for Korean vowels at isolated utterance condition. Audiology and Speech Research 12(3), 150-156. [https://doi.org/10.21848/asr.2016.12.3.150]
  • Lee, K. M. and S. Ramsey. 2011. A History of the Korean Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lee, S. H. and H. Go. 2004. Speech rate and the acoustic features of Korean segments. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of Korea 23(2), 162-172.
  • Lee, S. H. Go, Y. Han and J. Kim. 2003. Effects of speaking rate on Korean vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of Korea 22(1), 14-22.
  • Liberman, A., P. C. Delattre, F. S. Cooper and L. J. Gerstman. 1954. The role of Consonant-Vowel transitions in the perception of the stop and nasal consonants. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 68(8), 1-13. [https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093673]
  • Lindblom, B. 1963. Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 35(11), 1773-1781. [https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1918816]
  • Lindblom, B and K. Rapp. 1973. Some temporal regularities of spoken Swedish. Papers in Linguistics from the University of Stockholm 21, 1-59.
  • Magen, H. and S. Blumstein. 1993. Effects of speaking rate on the vowel length distinction in Korean. Journal of Phonetics 21(4), 387-409. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30227-X]
  • Miller, J. L. 1981. Effects of speaking rate on segmental distinctions. In P. D. Eimas, and J. L. Miller, eds., Perspectives on the study of speech, 39-74. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
  • Miner, K. 1979. Dorsey’s Law in Winnebago-Chiwere and Winnebago accent. International Journal of American Linguistics 45(1), 25-33. [https://doi.org/10.1086/465571]
  • Monsen, R. B. 1974. Durational aspects of vowel production in the speech of deaf children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 17(3), 386-398. [https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.1703.386]
  • Moon, S. and B. Lindblom. 1994. Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 96(1), 40–55. [https://doi.org/10.1121/1.410492]
  • Nadeu, M. 2014. Stress- and speech rate-induced vowel quality variation in Catalan and Spanish. Journal of Phonetics 46(1), 1-22. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2014.05.003]
  • Naver. 2024. Naver Dictionary. Available online at https://dict.naver.com/
  • National Institute of Korean Language. 2024. Standard Korean Language Dictionary. Available online at https://stdict.korean.go.kr/main/main.do/
  • Oh, J. 2016. The aspect of duration in Korean vowels according to the phonological conditions. The Society of Korean National Language and Literature 57, 185-207.
  • O’Shaughnessy, D. 1981. A study of French vowel and consonant durations. Journal of Phonetics 9(4), 385-406. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31016-2]
  • Paradis, C. and D. LaCharité. 2012. The Influence of attitude on the treatment of interdentals in loanwords: Illperformed importation. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 11, 97-126. [https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.12]
  • Park, H. and N. Ziegler. 2014. Cognitive shift in the bilingual mind: Spatial concepts in Korean-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17(2), 410-430. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000400]
  • Peterson, G. E. and H. L. Barney. 1952. Control methods used in a study of the vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 24(2), 175-184. [https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1906875]
  • Picheny, M. A., N. I. Durlach and L. D. Braida. 1985. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing I: Intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 28(1), 96-103. [https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2801.96]
  • Picheny, M. A., N. I. Durlach and L. D. Braida. 1986. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 29(4), 434-446. [https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2904.434]
  • R Core Team. 2025. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Available online at https://www.r-project.org/
  • Rositzke, H. A. 1939. Vowel length in general American speech. Language 15(2), 99-109. [https://doi.org/10.2307/408728]
  • Simpson, A and C. Ericsdotter. 1998. Sex-specific durational differences in English and Swedish. 15th ICPhS Barcelona, 1113-1116.
  • Smith, B. L. 2000. Variations in temporal patterns of speech production among speakers of English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 108(1), 2438-2442. [https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1290514]
  • Smith, B. L. 2002. Effects of speaking rate on temporal patterns of English. Phonetica 59(4), 232-244. [https://doi.org/10.1159/000068348]
  • Son, I. 2017. Comparative study on formant displacement in reading rate between Korean and English vowels of Korean speakers. Studies in English Language and Literature 59(3), 239-261.
  • Stetson, R. H. 1951. Motor phonetics: A study of speech movements in action. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
  • Tajima, K., D. Erickson and K. Nagao. 2002. Production of syllable structure in a second language: Factors affecting vowel epenthesis in Japanese-accented English. The Indiana University Linguistics Club Working Papers 2(2), 77-91.
  • Turner, G. S., K. Tjaden and G. Weismer. 1995. The influence of speaking rate on vowel space and speech intelligibility for individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 38(5), 1001-1013. [https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3805.1001]
  • Uffmann, C. 2006. Epenthetic vowel quality in loanwords: Empirical and formal issues. Lingua 116(7), 1079-1111. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.06.009]
  • Umeda, H. 2022. Korean vowels. Gengo Kenkyu Anthology 2, 25-41.
  • Umeda, N. 1975. Vowel duration in American English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 58(2), 434-445. [https://doi.org/10.1121/1.380688]
  • van Santen, J. P. H. 1992. Contextual effects on vowel duration. Speech Communication 11(6), 513-546. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6393(92)90027-5]
  • White, L., S. Benavides-Varela and K. Mády. 2020. Are initial-consonant lengthening and final-vowel lengthening both universal word segmentation cues? Journal of Phonetics 81, 1-14. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2020.100982]
  • Windmann, A., J. Šimko and P. Wagner. 2015. Polysyllabic shortening and word-final lengthening in English. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2015, 36-40. [https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2015-8]
  • Yoon, T.-J. 2024. Korean Forced Aligner. Available online at https://tyoon.net/
  • Zellou, G. 2011. Pharyngealization of French loanwords in dialectal Moroccan Arabic: An acoustic analysis of bilingual speakers. Dialectologia 6, 95-108.