The Korean Association for the Study of English Language and Linguistics
[ Article ]
Korea Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 26, No. 0, pp.875-893
ISSN: 1598-1398 (Print) 2586-7474 (Online)
Print publication date 31 Jul 2026
Received 02 May 2026 Revised 17 May 2026 Accepted 21 Jun 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.26..202607.875

Reconceptualizing the Simple View of Reading for Korean Secondary-Level EFL Learners: A Research Synthesis

Hansol Lee
Professor, Department of English Korea Military Academy 574 Hwarang-ro, Nowon-gu Seoul, Korea, Tel: +82-2-2197-2635 hansol@kma.ac.kr


© 2026 KASELL All rights reserved
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

This study systematically synthesizes 31 empirical studies to examine how the foundational components of the Simple View of Reading (SVR) framework are reconceptualized and contextually adapted for Korean secondary-level EFL learners. Through a qualitative research synthesis, this study reveals that the application of the SVR model exhibits unique characteristics that reflect a print-heavy environment driven by limited exposure to authentic oral input. First, regarding word recognition and its development, reading fluency operates as a crucial bridging process; advanced learners transition effectively from decoding to reading fluency, whereas basic decoding remains a persistent bottleneck for lower-proficiency students. Second, regarding linguistic comprehension, the literature indicates a predominant reliance on written linguistic knowledge (WLK), specifically vocabulary depth, grammatical knowledge, and morphological awareness. WLK functions as a major analytical resource that systematically compensates for the highly limited authentic oral language input. Finally, substantial learner heterogeneity within the same grade suggests that the predictive weights of these SVR components are dynamically moderated by cumulative L2 proficiency rather than chronological age. Ultimately, this study advocates for the incorporation of formative diagnostic assessments targeting basic decoding and reading fluency to resolve foundational bottlenecks. Concurrently, it calls for a pedagogical shift toward cultivating WLK as an active, meaning-making analytical resource, thereby providing a comprehensive framework for tailored interventions.

Keywords:

Simple View of Reading (SVR), reading comprehension, Korean secondary-level EFL learners, research synthesis, written linguistic knowledge (WLK), reconceptualization

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2025S1A5A2A01004947).

References

  • Ahn, H. and Y. Kang. 2016. Reading fluency and listening comprehension abilities as predictors of reading comprehension. English Teaching 71(1), 21-43. [https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.71.1.201603.3]
  • Ahn, J. 2024. Comparing the Types of L2 Oral Reading Fluency Measurement and Their Relationships with L2 Reading Ability for Korean EFL High School Students. Master’s thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  • An, K. Y. 2007. A Qualitative Research on English Reading Classes of Secondary School. Master’s thesis, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul, Korea.
  • Apel, K. 2022. A different view on the simple view of reading. Remedial and Special Education 43(6), 363-370. [https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325211063487]
  • Bae, J. 2017. Relationships between Lower-Level Processing Skills and Reading Comprehension of Korean EFL High School Students. Master’s thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  • Duke, N. K. and K. B. Cartwright. 2021. The science of reading progresses: Communicating advances beyond the simple view of reading. Reading Research Quarterly 56(S1), S25-S44. [https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.411]
  • Florit, E. and K. Cain. 2011. The simple view of reading: Is it valid for different types of alphabetic orthographies? Educational Psychology Review 23(4), 553-576. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9175-6]
  • Gough, P. B. and W. E. Tunmer. 1986. Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education 7(1), 6-10. [https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104]
  • Hoover, W. A. and P. B. Gough. 1990. The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 2(2), 127-160. [https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401799]
  • Hoover, W. A. and W. E. Tunmer. 2018. The simple view of reading: Three assessments of its adequacy. Remedial and Special Education 39(5), 304-312. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518773154]
  • Huh, Y. 2014. The relative predicting power of vocabulary depth and grammar in Korean EFL learners’ reading comprehension. Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics 30(3), 3-25. [https://doi.org/10.17154/kjal.2014.09.30.3.3]
  • Hwang, I. and B. Lee. 2023. Textbook-based L2 oral reading fluency of lower-level 8th grade EFL students and its association with L2 reading comprehension. The SNU Journal of Education Research 32(1), 35-61. [https://doi.org/10.54346/sjer.2023.32.2.33]
  • Jeon, E. H. 2012. Oral reading fluency in second language reading. Reading in a Foreign Language 24(2), 186-208. [https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/66860]
  • Jeon, E. H. and J. Yamashita. 2014. L2 reading comprehension and its correlates: A meta-analysis. Language Learning 64(1), 160-212. [https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12034]
  • Kang, Y. 2011. Reading fluency vs. oral language comprehension in predicting reading comprehension of Korean EFL learners. Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics 27(4), 81-102.
  • Kang, Y. 2013. Explaining Korean high school EFL learners’ reading comprehension with simple view of reading. Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics 29(3), 75-100. [https://doi.org/10.17154/kjal.2013.09.29.3.75]
  • Kang, Y. 2020. Relative contribution of reading fluency and vocabulary knowledge in predicting Korean EFL learners’ reading comprehension. The Journal of Asia TEFL 17(3), 778-790. [https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2020.17.3.2.778]
  • Kang, Y., Y. Huh, B. Moon and Y. Park. 2014. Decoding skills vs. reading fluency in Korean high school EFL learners’ reading comprehension. English Teaching 69(4), 127-147. [https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.69.4.201412.123]
  • Kang, Y., H. S. Kang and J. Park. 2012. Is it vocabulary breadth or depth that better predict Korean EFL learners’ reading comprehension? English Teaching 67(4), 149-171. [https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.67.4.201212.149]
  • Kendeou, P., R. Savage and P. van den Broek. 2009. Revisiting the simple view of reading. British Journal of Educational Psychology 79(2), 353-370. [https://doi.org/10.1348/978185408X369020]
  • Kim, E. J. and Y. Kang. 2014. Unique contribution of vocabulary depth to Korean EFL learners’ reading comprehension. Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics 30(4), 51-75. [https://doi.org/10.17154/kjal.2014.09.30.3.51]
  • Kim, H. 2012. The simple view of reading: Decoding or fluency? Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics 28(1), 209-231. [https://doi.org/10.17154/kjal.2012.03.28.1.209]
  • Kim, H. 2022. The Roles of L2 Written Linguistic Knowledge and L2 Listening Comprehension of First-Year High School EFL Learners in L2 Reading Comprehension: An SEM Analysis. Doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kim, H. and B. Lee. 2021. Distinct L2 reading-related subgroups of Korean EFL first-year high school learners: Latent profile analysis. The Journal of Asia TEFL 18(4), 1324-1346. [https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2021.18.4.15.1324]
  • Kim, J. 2016. Linguistic Abilities, Individual Differences, and Sociocultural Backgrounds in English Reading Ability of Korean High School Students: Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kim, J. S. and Y. K. Cho. 2013. Relative roles of vocabulary and grammar knowledge in second language reading. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics 13(3), 497-520. [https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.13.3.201309.497]
  • Kim, J. S. and Y. K. Cho. 2015. Proficiency effects on relative roles of vocabulary and grammar knowledge in second language reading. English Teaching 70(1), 75-96. [https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.70.1.201503.75]
  • Kim, K. J. 2015. Factors affecting English reading comprehension of Korean middle school students. Studies in English Language & Literature 57(1), 45-64. [https://doi.org/10.18853/jjell.2015.57.1.003]
  • Kim, M. 2019. Vocabulary size tests of different modality and their relationships with L2 reading and listening comprehension by Korean EFL learners in middle school. Language Research 55(1), 203-227. [https://doi.org/10.30961/lr.2019.55.1.203]
  • Kim, M. 2025. The Role of L2 Written Linguistic Knowledge in L2 Reading Comprehension of Korean EFL Middle School Students. Master’s thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kim, Y.-S. G. 2017. Why the simple view of reading is not simplistic: Unpacking component skills of reading using a direct and indirect effects model of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading 21(4), 310-333. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1291643]
  • Lee, B. 2008. College students’ experiences of exposure to spoken English: Focusing on the amount of exposure time and types. English Teaching 63(4), 349-370. [https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.63.4.200812.349]
  • Lee, B. 2014. Why English Fails You: The Meaning of Learning English in South Korea. Seoul: Urihakyo.
  • Lee, B. and H. Kim. 2024. Heterogeneity of English reading skills and its associations with learning backgrounds in Korean EFL contexts. English Teaching 79(4), 3-31. [https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.79.4.202412.3]
  • Lee, G. 2024. A Two-Year Longitudinal Study of L2 Reading Development Among Korean EFL Vocational High School Students. Doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  • Lee, G. and B. Lee. 2024. Transitional patterns in L2 reading-related abilities of distinct subgroups of EFL Korean vocational high school students: A latent transition analysis. The Journal of Asia TEFL 21(2), 270-285. [https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2024.21.2.1.270]
  • Lee, H., H. Chung, Y. Zhang, J. Abedi and M. Warschauer. 2020. The effectiveness and features of formative assessment in US K-12 education: A systematic review. Applied Measurement in Education 33(2), 124-140. [https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2020.1732383]
  • Lee, H., G. Jung and J. H. Lee. 2022. Simple view of second language reading: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach. Scientific Studies of Reading 26(6), 585-603. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2022.2087526]
  • Lee, H. and J. H. Lee. 2024. Extending the simple view of reading in second and foreign language learning: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach. Review of Educational Research 94(4), 467-500. [https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231186605]
  • Lee, H., J. H. Lee and R. C. Scarcella. 2026. Influencing language mindsets and English writing competence through an EAP program: A longitudinal study with latent transition analysis. Language Teaching Research 30(1), 92-114. [https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221143258]
  • Lee, H., M. Warschauer and J. H. Lee. 2019. Advancing CALL research via data mining techniques: Unearthing hidden groups of learners in a corpus-based L2 vocabulary learning experiment. ReCALL 31(2), 135-149. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344018000162]
  • Lee, J., D. L. Schallert and E. Kim. 2015. Effects of extensive reading and translation activities on grammar knowledge and attitudes for EFL adolescents. System 52, 38-50. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.04.016]
  • Lee, J. W. and Y.-S. G. Kim. 2024. The relations of morphological awareness with vocabulary, word reading, and reading comprehension for Korean-speaking middle school students. Reading and Writing 37(1), 1-28. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10491-7]
  • Lee, J. W. and Y.-S. G. Kim. 2025. Cross-linguistic relations of morphological awareness between Korean and English to language and reading skills for Korean adolescents. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 249(1), 106118. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106118]
  • Lesaux, N. K., A. C. Crosson, M. J. Kieffer and M. Pierce. 2010. Uneven profiles: Language minority learners’ word reading, vocabulary, and reading comprehension skills. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 31(6), 475-483. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2010.09.004]
  • Levesque, K. C., H. L. Breadmore and S. H. Deacon. 2021. How morphology impacts reading and spelling: Advancing the role of morphology in models of literacy development. Journal of Research in Reading 44(1), 10-26. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12313]
  • Moher, D., A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff and D. G. Altman. 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ 339, b2535. [https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535]
  • Moon, B. 2020. The Role of Oral Reading Fluency and Lower/Higher-Level Comprehension Skills in Reading Comprehension of Skilled and Less Skilled Korean High School EFL Learners. Master’s thesis, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
  • Nakamoto, J., K. A. Lindsey and F. R. Manis. 2008. A cross-linguistic investigation of English language learners’ reading comprehension in English and Spanish. Scientific Studies of Reading 12(4), 351-371. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430802378526]
  • Park, J. 2018. Does reading fluency predict reading comprehension of Korean middle school EFL learners? Modern English Education 19(4), 50-58. [https://doi.org/10.18095/meeso.2018.19.4.50]
  • Perfetti, C. and J. Stafura. 2014. Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading 18(1), 22-37. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.827687]
  • Proctor, C. P., M. Carlo, D. August and C. Snow. 2005. Native Spanish-speaking children reading in English: Toward a model of comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology 97(2), 246-256. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.246]
  • Quinn, J. M. and R. K. Wagner. 2018. Using meta-analytic structural equation modeling to study developmental change in relations between language and literacy. Child Development 89(6), 1956-1969. [https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13049]
  • Ripoll, J. C., G. Aguado Alonso and A. P. Castilla-Earls. 2014. The simple view of reading in elementary school: A systematic review. Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología 34(1), 17-31. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rlfa.2013.04.006]
  • Ryu, J. 2023. Exploring the Role of Prosody in Korean EFL High School Students’ Oral Reading Fluency. Doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  • Ryu, J. and B. Lee. 2021. Diagnosis of Korean EFL high school students’ reading fluency using informal reading inventory. The Journal of Asia TEFL 18(2), 489-504. [https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2021.18.2.7.489]
  • Shin, H. and B. Lee. 2019. “English Divide” and ELT in Korea: Towards critical ELT policy and practices. In X. Gao, ed., Second Handbook of English Language Teaching, 73-90. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2_5]
  • Shiotsu, T. and C. J. Weir. 2007. The relative significance of syntactic knowledge and vocabulary breadth in the prediction of reading comprehension test performance. Language Testing 24(1), 99-128. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532207071513]
  • Thomas, J. and A. Harden. 2008. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology 8(1), 45. [https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45]
  • Woo, K. and Y. Lee. 2017. An analysis of correlation among reading speed, accuracy and comprehension. Journal of Language Sciences 24(1), 81-105. [https://doi.org/10.14384/kals.2017.24.1.085]
  • Zhang, D. 2012. Vocabulary and grammar knowledge in second language reading comprehension: A structural equation modeling study. The Modern Language Journal 96(4), 558-575. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01398.x]