The Korean Association for the Study of English Language and Linguistics

Current Issue

Korea Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 18 , No. 4

[ Article ]
Korea Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 18, No. 4, pp.470-485
Abbreviation: KASELL
ISSN: 1598-1398 (Print)
Print publication date 31 Dec 2018
Received 18 Nov 2018 Revised 14 Dec 2018 Accepted 18 Dec 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.18.4.201812.470

Effects of Flipped Learning on the Learning of English Vocabulary
Woo Young Kim
Professor, Dept. of English Hansei University Hansei-ro 30, Gunpo-si, Gyeonggi-do 15852, Korea


Abstract

Kim, Woo Young. 2018. Effects of Flipped Learning on the Learning of English Vocabulary. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics 18-4, 470-485. This study is designed to investigate the effects of flipped learning on the Korean university students’ learning of English vocabulary. The study is designed to investigate the effects on the immediate posttest and the delayed posttest. Besides the overall effects, it investigates the effects of flipped learning with respect to the types of vocabulary (i.e., receptive and productive), also through immediate and delayed post-tests. Sixty students who were enrolled a TOEIC class at a Korean university were divided into two groups: experimental group (i.e., the flipped learning group) and the control group (i.e., the traditional learning group with no flipped learning). The students’ pre- and post-test scores were compared and analyzed through the descriptive statistics and the independent sample t-test. The results of the experiment showed that the students’ vocabulary scores improved for the flipped learning group, not for the control group who received the traditional vocabulary treatment, and the effects lasted two weeks after the treatment. In addition, the effects of flipped learning were found, regardless of the types of vocabulary.


Keywords: flipped learning, teaching method, vocabulary learning, receptive and productive vocabulary

References
1. Bang, Youngjoo. 2017. The effect of flipped learning in an EFL classroom. Modern English Education 18(2), 87-107.
2. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. 2012. Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
3. Bishop, J., and M. A. Verleger. 2013, June. The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. Paper presented at. 2013 ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta, Georgia. Retrieved on May 25, 2016, from the World Wide Web: https://peer.asee.org/22585.
4. Cho, Young Sang and Yoo-Jean Lee. 2016. Can flipped learning be applied to a test-based English classroom? Modern English Education 17(4), 181-200.
5. Coady, J. and T. Huckin. 1997. Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge. University Press.
6. Davies, R. and R. West. 2013. Technology integration in school settings. In M. Spector, D. Merrill, J. Elen, and M. J. Bishop, eds., Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 4th ed. New York: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
7. Fulton, K. 2012. Upside down and inside out: Flip your classroom to improve student learning. Learning and Leading with Technology 39(8), 12-17.
8. Harvey, S. 2014. The flipped Latin classroom: A case study. Classical World 108(1), 117-127.
9. Hulstijn, J. H. 1993. When do foreign-language readers look up the meaning of unfamiliar words? The influence. of task and learner variables. The Modern Language Journal 77(2), 139-147.
10. Kim, Yenarae and Kyong-Hyon Pyo. 2017. A study on self-directed learning attitude and academic achievement in a flipped classroom. Studies in Linguistics 45, 423-455.
11. Nagy, W. E. and P. A. Herman. 1987. Breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge: Implications for acquisition. and instruction. In M. G. Mc-Keown & M. E. Curtis, eds., The Nature of Vocabulary Acquisition, 19-35. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Pyo, Kyong-Hyon. 2017. Variables influencing learner achievement and satisfaction in a flipped classroom. Studies in Linguistics 43, 345-373.
13. Pyo, Kyong-Hyon. 2018. Effects of flipped classroom on university students’ academic self-efficacy. Studies in Linguistics 49, 553-581.
14. Read, J. 2000. Assessing Vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Saragi, T., I. S. P. Nation and G. F. Meister. 1978. Vocabulary learning and reading. System 6(2), 72-78.
16. Sokmen, A. J. 1997. Current trends in teaching second language. vocabulary. In N. Schmitt and M. McCarthy, eds., Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy, 237-257. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Sternberg, R. J. 1987. Teaching critical thinking: Eight easy ways to fail before you begin. Phi Delta Kappa 68, 456-459.
18. Tucker, B. 2012. The flipped classroom. Education Next 12(1), 82-83.
19. Winquist, J. R. and K. A. Carlson. 2014. Flipped statistics class results: Better performance than lecture over one. year later. Journal of Statistics Education 22(3), 1-10.
20. Yang, Jungim. 2017. Effects of flipped learning on university students’ acquisition of collocation and attitude. New Korean Journal of English Language and Literature 59(1), 145-161.
21. Yim, Gana and Kyeong-Hee Rha. 2017. Effects of using flipped learning in the college setting on students’ English achievement and class satisfaction. Studies in Linguistics 44, 289-307.
22. Zappe, S., R. Leicht, J. Messner, T. Litzinger and H. W. Lee. 2009, June. Flipping the classroom to explore: Active learning in a large undergraduate course Paper presented at 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, Texas. Retrieved on April 27, 2016, from the World Wide Web: https://peer.asee.org/4545.