The Korean Association for the Study of English Language and Linguistics

Current Issue

Korea Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 19 , No. 4

[ Article ]
Korea Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 19, No. 4, pp.629-643
Abbreviation: KASELL
ISSN: 1598-1398 (Print)
Print publication date 31 Dec 2019
Received 10 Nov 2019 Revised 16 Dec 2019 Accepted 20 Dec 2019

Frequency and Acoustic Reduction in English –ment Derivatives
Jae-Hyun Sung
Yonsei University


This study investigates the influence of frequency on the production of bimorphemic words, and considers which frequency measure is most apt to explain the differences. Previous studies have reported that frequent words are produced faster and more casually than infrequent ones, and that medial segments will yield shorter durations. The present study examines the relation between frequency and the duration of medial segments in English derived words by conducting a production experiment with 6 native speakers of American English using 74 English –ment derivatives, and evaluates whole-word frequency, base frequency, and relative frequency (whole-word frequency divided by base frequency) against one another as predictors. The results show that models incorporating any of the three frequency measures strongly predict medial segment duration. Among the three frequency measures, whole-word frequency explained the most variance, across all consonant types. The duration of segments in highly frequent words tends to be shorter than that in relatively infrequent words. Overall, this study confirms that speakers are sensitive to the extralinguistic information associated with the words such as frequency, and in this case, traditional frequency measures (whole-word and base frequencies) are better predictors than relative frequency.

Keywords: English –ment derivatives, whole-word frequency, base frequency, relative frequency, acoustic reduction

1. Kim, J.-H. 2009. A reconsideration of asymmetries of bracketing paradoxes in English derivation: A corpus-based approach. English Language and Literature 55-3, 475-495.
2. Boersma, P. and D. Weenink. 2011. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer, Version 5.1.25.
3. Bush, N. 2001. Frequency effects and word-boundary palatalization in English. In J. L. Bybee and P. Hopper, eds., Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, 255-280. John Benjamins.
4. Davies, M. 2008. Corpus of Contemporary American English.
5. Ernestus, M., M. Lahey, F. Verhees and H. Baayen. 2006. Lexical frequency and voice assimilation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120, 1040-1051.
6. Ernestus, M. 2011. Gradience and categoricality in phonological theory. In M. van Oostendorp, C. J. Ewen, E. Hume and K. Rice, eds., The Blackwell Companion to Phonology: Volume IV. Phonological Interfaces, 1-22. Wiley.
7. Gahl, S. 2008. Time and thyme are not homophones: The effect of lemma frequency on word duration in spontaneous speech. Language 84, 474-496.
8. Hammond, M. 2004. Gradience, phonotactics, and the lexicon in English phonology. International Journal of English Studies 4, 1-24.
9. Hay, J. 2002. From speech perception to morphology: Affix ordering revisited. Language 78, 527-555.
10. Hay, J. 2003. Causes and Consequences of Word Structure. Routledge.
11. Hay, J. and R. H. Baayen. 2005. Shifting paradigms: Gradient structure in morphology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9, 342-348.
12. Katamba, F. and J. Stonham. 2006. Morphology, 2nd ed. Palgrave Macmillan.
13. Myers, J. and Y. Li. 2009. Lexical frequency effects in Taiwan Southern Min syllable contraction. Journal of Phonetics 37, 212-230.
14. Pluymaekers, M., Ernestus, M., and R. H. Baayen. 2005. Lexical frequency and acoustic reduction in spoken Dutch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118, 2561-2569.

Jae-Hyun Sung, ProfessorYonsei UniversityDepartment of English Language and Literature50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-guSeoul, KoreaTel: 02) 2123-2329E-mail: