The Korean Association for the Study of English Language and Linguistics

Current Issue

Korea Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 20

[ Article ]
Korea Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 20, No. 1, pp.588-612
Abbreviation: KASELL
ISSN: 1598-1398 (Print)
Print publication date 31 Mar 2020
Received 01 Oct 2020 Revised 21 Oct 2020 Accepted 25 Oct 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.20..202010.588

Efficacy of Early Study Abroad on Second-language English Morphosyntactic Competence: Effects of Age and Learning Contexts
Sangki Kim
Konkuk University


Copyright 2020 KASELL
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Early study abroad (SA) continues to be a popular form of foreign language education based on the assumed benefits of immersing oneself in the target language-speaking context. Taking a comparative perspective, this study aims to confirm an association between early SA and L2 English grammatical competence. Data were collected from questionnaires and a 72-item grammaticality judgment test administered to 195 Korean high school students, which were analyzed using ANCOVA and Multiple Regression Analysis. The results confirmed that the early study-abroad context is more advantageous than the study-at-home context for English morphosyntax acquisition. The L2 English-immersion context in the L1-speaking macro-setting was beneficial only to the study-abroad group. The findings also show that length of residence is a more influential factor than the age of arrival during early SA for improving L2 English grammatical competence. It is argued that the study-abroad context facilitated L2 English grammar more effectively than did the foreign language learning or L2 English-immersion contexts; however, the length of SA was more important than the effect of age.


Keywords: early study abroad, learning contexts, age effect, length of residence

References
1. Abrahamsson, N. and K. Hyltenstam. 2009. The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30(4), 481-509.
2. Bakers, C. 2011. Foundations of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters
3. Bialystok, E. 1997. The structure of age: In search of barriers to second language acquisition. Second Language Research 13(2), 116-137.
4. Bialystok, E. and K. Hakuta. 1999. Confounded age: Linguistic and cognitive factors in age differences for second language acquisition. In D. Birdsong, eds., Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis, 161-181. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Bialystok, E. and B. Miller. 1999. The problem of age in second language acquisition: Influences from language, task, and structure. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2(2), 127-145.
6. Birdsong, D. and M. Molis. 2001. On the evidence for maturational constraints in second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language 44(2), 235-249.
7. Cheng, A. C. and C. C. Mojica-Diaz. 2006. The effects of formal instruction and study abroad on improving proficiency: The case of the Spanish subjunctive. Applied Language Learning 16(1), 17-36.
8. Churchill, E. and M. DuFon. 2006. Evolving threads in study abroad research. In M. DuFon and E. Churchill, eds., Language Learners in Study Abroad Contexts, 1-27. Clevedon: BGR: Multilingual Matters Limited.
9. Collentine, J. 2004. The effects of learning contexts on morphosyntactic and lexical development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26(2), 227-248.
10. Collentine, J. 2009. Study abroad research: Findings, implications and future directions. In M. H. Long and C. J. Catherine, eds., The Handbook of Language Teaching (pp. 218-233). New York: Wiley.
11. DeKeyser, R. 1991. Foreign language development during a semester abroad. In B. F. Freed, eds., Foreign Language Acquisition Research and the Classroom, 104-119. Lexington: MA: D.C. Heath.
12. DeKeyser, R. 2000. The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22(4), 493-533.
13. DeKeyser, R. M. 2013. Age effects in second language learning: Stepping stones toward better understanding. Language Learning 63(s1), 52-67.
14. Flege, J. E., G. Yeni-Komshian and S. Liu. 1999. Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Phonetics 25, 169-186.
15. Freed, B. F. (1995). Language learning and study abroad. In B. F. Freed, eds., Second Language Acquisition in a Study Abroad Context, 3-33. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
16. Hakuta, K., Bialystok, E. and E. Wiley. 2003. Critical evidence: A Test of the critical period hypothesis for second language acquisition. Psychological Science 14, 31-38.
17. Hansen, L. 2001. Language attrition: The fate of the start. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 21, 60-73.
18. Isabelli, C. and C. Nishida. 2005. Development of the Spanish subjucntive in a nine-month study-abroad setting. Paper presented at the Selected Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages, Sommerville.
19. Johnson, J. and E. Newport. 1989. Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology 21(1), 60-99.
20. Kim, H. and M. Sung. 2017. Research of citizen’s perception on early study abroad (Report No.: SB170007). n.p.: Piodi Company
21. Kinginger, C. 2008. Language learning in study abroad: Case studies of Americans in France. Modern Language Journal 92, 1-124.
22. Korean Educational Development Institute. 2005. Research of Citizen’s Perception and Actual Condition on Early Study Abroad: Focusing on Compliance of Rules. Seoul, Korea: Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
23. Korean Educational Development Institute. 2009. Statistical Yearbook of Education. Seoul, Korea: Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
24. Korean Educational Development Institute. 2018. Statistical Yearbook of Education. Seoul, Korea: Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
25. Lafford, B. and J. Collentine. 2006. The Effects of study abroad and classroom contexts on the acquisition of Spanish as a second language: From research to application. In M. R. Salaberry and B. Lafford, eds., The Art of teaching Spanish: Second language acquisition from research to Praxis, 103-126. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
26. Llanes, À. and C. Muñoz. 2013. Age effects in a study abroad context: Children and adults studying abroad and at home. Language Learning 63(1), 63-90.
27. Long, M. H. 1996. The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie and T. K. Bhatia, eds., Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, Vol. 2: Second Language Acquisition, 413-468. New York: Academic.
28. Long, M. H. 2005. Problems with supposed counter-evidence to the critical period hypothesis. International Review of Applied Linguistics 43, 287-317.
29. Muñoz, C. 2006. Accuracy orders, rate of learning and age in morphological acquisition. In C. Muñoz, eds., Age and the Rate of Foreign Language Learning, 107-126. Clevedon, GBR: Multilingual Matters Limited.
30. Ortega, L. 2009. Understanding Second Language Acquisition. London: Hodder Education.
31. Pérez-Vidal, C. and M. Juan-Garau. 2011. The effect of context and input conditions on oral and written development: A study abroad perspective. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 49(2), 157-185
32. Seidenberg, M. S. and J. D. Zevin. 2006. Connectionist models in developmental cognitive neuroscience: Critical periods and the paradox of success. In Y. Munakata and M. Johnson, eds., Processes of Change in Brain and Cognitive Development: Attention & Performance XXI, 585-612. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Stevens, G. 2006. The Age-length-onset problem in research on second language acquisition among immigrants. Language Learning 56(4), 671-692.
34. Swain, M. 1985. Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass and C. Madden, eds., Input in Second Language Acquisition, 235-256. New York: Newbury House.
35. Tabachnick, B. G., and L. S. Fidell. 2012. Using multivariate statistics, 6th ed.. Boston: Pearson.
36. Ministry of Education. 1997. The 7th Curricula: High School Curricula. Seoul: Retrieved from http://curri.mest.go.kr/main.jsp?idx=050101
37. Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development. 2007. The Study for the Analysis of Types of Early Study Abroad. Seoul: Retrieved from http://naver.nanet.go.kr/SearchDetailList.do
38. Thomas, M. S. C. and M. H. Johnson. 2008. Sensitive periods in brain development. New Advances in Understanding Sensitive Periods in Brain Development 17(1), 1-5.
39. Tomiyama, M. 2000. Age and proficiency in L2 attrition: Data from two siblings. Applied Linguistics 30(2), 253-275.
40. van Els, T. 1986. An overview of European research on language acquisition. In B. Weltens, K. de Bot and T. Van Els, eds., Language Attrition in Progress, 3-18. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
41. Weltens, B. and T. van Els. 1986. The attrition of French as a foreign language: Interim results. In B. Weltens, K. de Bot and T. Van Els, eds., Language Attrition in Progress, 205-221. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

Sangki, Kim, ProfessorDepartment of English Linguistics and English LiteratureKonkuk University268 Chungwon-daero, Chungju-si,Chungcheongbuk-do 27478, KoreaTel: 010-4581-2808Email: zzzzeyes@gmail.com