The Korean Association for the Study of English Language and Linguistics

Current Issue

Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 21

[ Article ]
Korea Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 21, No. 0, pp.510-524
Abbreviation: KASELL
ISSN: 1598-1398 (Print) 2586-7474 (Online)
Received 06 Jun 2021 Revised 18 Jun 2021 Accepted 25 Jun 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.21..202106.510

Breaking through Digital Barriers: Exploring EFL Students’ Views of Zoom Breakout Room Experiences
Andrea Rakushin Lee
Professor, Konkuk University Glocal Campus (andrealee1216@gmail.com)


© 2021 KASELL All rights reserved
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Funding Information ▼

Abstract

As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, many educators had to transition from face to face to online classes. Zoom has become a popular platform for live, online classes in different educational contexts including English language learning. This phenomenological study sought to gain insight into South Korean students’ satisfaction with Zoom breakout rooms in English communication classes. Participants included 25 undergraduate students attending English communication classes at a university in central South Korea. Data collection comprised an open-ended survey, a focus group, and individual interviews. Data analysis centered on examining significant statements and developing themes. The results of this study indicate that most students were satisfied with using Zoom breakout rooms for EFL classes. Further, students expanded on various benefits of using Zoom breakout rooms and provided recommendations for improvement. This paper concludes with practical implications and suggestions for future research pertaining to the use of Zoom breakout rooms in EFL classes.


Keywords: Zoom, videoconferencing, EFL, breakout rooms, synchronous learning

Acknowledgments

This paper was supported by Konkuk University in 2020.


References
1. Assalahi, H. 2020. Learning EFL online during a pandemic: Insights into the quality of emergency online education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Education Research 19(11), 203-222.
2. bin Rosawi, K. A. 2020. Zoom user guide. International Journal of TESOL Studies 2(2), 1-12.
3. Bueno-Alastuey, M. 2011. Perceived benefits and drawbacks of synchronous voice computer mediated communication in the foreign language classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning24(5), 419–432.
4. Cavinato, A. G., R. A. Hunger, L. S. Ott and J. K. Robinson. 2021. Promoting student interaction, engagement, and success in an online environment. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 413, 1513-1520.
5. Chandler, K. 2016. Using breakout rooms in synchronous online tutorials. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice 4(3), 16-23.
6. Creswell, J. W. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
7. Delello, J. A., R. R. McWhorter and H. Lawrence. 2019. Fostering a community of inquiry in online discussions. Academic Exchange Quarterly 23(1), 51-57. http://rapidintellect.com/AEQweb/5933-how-to.pdf
8. Fiock, H. 2020. Designing a community of inquiry in online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 21(1), 135-153.
9. Garrison, D. R. 2018. Designing a community of inquiry. Community of Inquiry. http://www.thecommunityofinquiry.org/editorial9
10. Garrison, D. R. 2017. E-learning in the 21st Century: A Community of Inquiry Framework for Research and Practice. Routledge.
11. Garrison, D. R., T. Anderson and W. Archer. 2000. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education 2(2-3), 87-105.
12. Garrison, D. R., T. Anderson and W. Archer. 2001. Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education 15(1), 7-23.
13. Greyling, W. and F. Ahmad. 2020. Zoom-based delivery as an interactively accomplished learning conversation: A tentative descriptive account. http://researcharchive.wintec.ac.nz/7368/1/2020%20Discursive%20features%20Zoom%20Covid19.pdf
14. Hartshorn, K. J. and B. L. McMurry. 2020. The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on ESL learners and TESOL practitioners in the United States. International Journal of TESOL Studies 2(2), 140-156.
15. Hodges, C., S. Moore, B. Lockee, T. Trust and A. Bond. 2020, March 27. The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
16. Hyer, A. 2019. Establishing presence in an online course using Zoom video conferencing. 2019 Undergraduate Research and Scholarship Conference. 123. https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/under_conf_2019/123/
17. Jorge, I. 2010. Social presence and cognitive presence in an online training program for teachers of Portuguese: Relation and methodological issues. IODL and ICEM 2010 Join Conference and Media Days, 427-435.
18. Kang, M. and S. Karau. 2013. Factors of learner instructor interaction which predict perceived outcomes in online learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 29(3), 292-301.
19. Kato, F., R. Spring and C. Mori. 2016. Mutually beneficial foreign language learning: Creating meaningful interactions through video-synchronous computer-mediated communication. Foreign Language Annals 49(2), 355-366.
20. Kohnke, L. and B. L. Moorhouse. 2020. Facilitating synchronous online language learning through Zoom. RELC Journal, 1-6.
21. Lawrence-Benedict, H., M. Pfahl and S. J. Smith. 2019. Community of inquiry in online education: Using student evaluative data for assessment and strategic development. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education 25,
22. Lederman, D. 2020, March 25. The shift to remote learning: The human element. InsideHigherEd. https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/article/2020/03/25/how-shift-remote-learning-might-affect-students-instructors-and
23. Lin, H. 2014. Computer-mediated communication (CMC) in L2 oral proficiency development: A meta-analysis. ReCALL, 27(3), 261-287.
24. Mohamed, K. 2021. The impact of utilizing breakout rooms in ESL distance learning from students’ perspectives [Unpublished manuscript]. Faculty of Education, British University in Dubai.
25. Moorhouse, B. L. 2020. Adaptations to face-to-face initial teacher education course ‘forced’ online due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Education for Teaching 46(4),
26. Murphy, M. P. A. 2020. COVID-19 and emergency elearning: Consequences of the securitization of higher education for post-pandemic pedagogy. Contemporary Security Policy 41(3), 492-505.
27. Ochonogor, C., O. Alakpodia and E. Achugbue. 2012. The impact of text slang (Tms) or chartoom slang on students’ academic performance. International Journal of Internet of Things 1(2), 1-14.
28. Park, Y. and C. Bonk. 2007. Synchronous learning experiences: Distance and residential learners’ perspectives in a blended graduate course. Journal of Interactive Online Learning 6(3), 245-264. http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/6.3.6.pdf
29. Richardson, J. C., Y. Maeda, J. Lv. and S. Caskurlu. 2017. Social presence in relation to students’ satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior 71, 402-417.
30. Salisman, S., M. Rutherford, M. Tovin and R. Cianelli. 2018. Cultural integration online: The lived experience of English-as-a-second-language RN-BSN nursing students learning in an online environment. Nursing Education Perspective 39(4), 221-224. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29543628/
31. Sauro, S. and K. Zourou. 2019. What are the digital wilds? Language Learning & Technology 23(1), 1-7.
32. Serembus, J. F. and D. C. Kemery. 2020. Creating dynamic learning with Zoom. Nursing Educator 45(6), 291-293.
33. Smidt, E., M. H. Chau, E. Rinehimer and P. Leever. 2021. Exploring engagement of users of global Englishes in a community of inquiry. System 98.
34. Sutterlin, J. 2018 December. Learning is social with Zoom video conferencing in your classroom. https://elearnmag.acm.org/featured.cfm?aid=3236697
35. Tucker, C. R. 2020. Successfully taking offline classes online. Educational Leadership: Special Report. http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/summer20/vol77/num10/Successfully-Taking-Offline-Classes-Online.aspx
36. University of Michigan. 2020. Improving breakout room discussions in online teaching. https://lsa.umich.edu/technology-services/news-events/all-news/teaching-tip-of-the-week/improving-breakout-room-discussions-in-online-teaching.html
37. Wiederhold, B. K. 2020. Connecting through technology during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: Avoiding “Zoom fatigue.” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 23(7), 437-428.
38. Vurdien, R. 2019. Videoconferencing: Developing students’ communicative competence. Journal of Foreign Language Education and Technology 4(2), 269-298. http://jflet.com/jflet/index.php/jflet/article/view/145
39. Vygotsky, L. S. 1981. The genesis of higher mental functions. Harvard University Press.
40. Yi, Y. and J. Jang. 2020. Envisioning possibilities amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications from English language teaching in South Korea. Current Issues in TESOL: TESOL and the COVID-19 pandemic, 1-5.
41. Zhang, M. 2020. When at home: A phenomenological study of Zoom class experience. Paper presented at the TFH2020: Technology and the Future of the Home Conference, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, November 5-6, 2020.
42. Zhao, Y. 2009. Communication strategy use and negotiation of meaning in text chat and video conferencing [Doctoral dissertation]. Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH). https://etd.ohiolink.edu/!etd.send_file?accession=csu1278398160&disposition=inline