| |
1. |
Aldridge, M. and J. Luchjeonbroers. 2007. Linguistic manipulations in legal discourse: Framing questions and ‘smuggling’ information. International Journal of Speech, Language, and Law 14, 83-105.
|
2. |
Beach, W. 1985. Temporal density in courtroom interaction:Constraints on the recovery of past events in legal discourse.Communication Monographs 52, 1-18..
|
3. |
Cotterill, J. 2003. Language and Power in Court: A Linguistic Analysis of the O. J. Simpson Trial. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
|
4. |
Fairclough, N. 2000. New Labour, New Language. London: Routledge. |
5. |
Figueiredo, D. 1998. An analysis of transitivity choices in five appellate decisions in rape cases. Revista Fragmentos 8, 97-113. |
6. |
Fowler, R. 1986. Linguistic Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
7. |
Guang, S. 2010. An analysis of the transitivity system in courtroom discourse. Chinese Semiotic Studies 4, 245-257.
|
8. |
Halliday, M. 1978. Language as Social Semiotics: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Baltimore: University Park Press. |
9. |
Halliday, M. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold. |
10. |
Hasan, R. 1988. The analysis of one poem: Theoretical issues in practice. In D. Birch and M. O. Tool, eds., Functions and Styles, 45-73. London: Edward Arnold. |
11. |
Lind, A. and G. Ke. 1985. Opening and closing statements. In S. M. Kassin and L. S. Wrightsman, eds., The Psychology of Evidence and Trial Procedure, 229-253. London: Sage. |
12. |
Pennington, N. and R. Hastie. 1991. A cognitive theory of juror decision making: The story model. Cordoza Law Review 13, 519-557. |
13. |
Perrin, T. L., H. M. Caldwell and C. A. Chase. 2003. The Art and Science of Trial Advocacy. Cincinati: Anderson. |
14. |
Rosulek, L. 2008. Manipulating silence and social representation in the closing arguments of a child sexual abuse case. Text and Talk 28, 529-550.
|
15. |
Rosulek, L. 2015. Dueling Discourses: The Construction of Reality in Closing Arguments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
|
16. |
Spiecker, S. and D. Worthington. 2003. The influence of opening statement/closing argument organization strategy on juror verdict and damage awards. Law and Human Behavior 24(4), 437-456.
|