The Korean Association for the Study of English Language and Linguistics

Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 19 , No. 3
[Paper List] [Goto Volume List]

[ Article ]
Korea Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 309-324
Abbreviation: KASELL
ISSN: 1598-1398 (Print)
Print publication date 30 Sep 2019
Received 30 Jul 2019 Revised 10 Sep 2019 Accepted 18 Sep 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.19.3.201909.309

Resolution of Ellipsis in Stacked VPs
Wooseung Lee ; Myung-Kwan Park
Professor, Department of English Education Konkuk University 120 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05029, Korea (wlee6@konkuk.ac.kr)
Professor, Department of English Dongguk University 30, 1-gil, Phil-dong-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul 04620, Korea (parkmk@dgu.edu)

Abstract

This paper investigates previously noted but not satisfactorily explained data, in which an elided VP is embedded within another elided VP. Specifically, the first VP can get a sloppy reading, for which the preceding sentence does not offer an appropriate antecedent directly. As for this elliptical construction, Tomioka (2008) assumes that VP Ellipsis is an instance of PF deletion, based on Merchant (2001). He further proposes the identity condition for E-marked constituents. We, however, show that the issue here is not directly related to ‘E-feature’ since the relevant examples do not necessarily bear ‘E-feature’. Rather, the sloppy reading concerns itself with pro-usages of VP (pro here representing a VP that is to undergo ellipsis/substitution after meeting the identity condition on it), regardless of whether the VP is realized as ‘null’ or ‘do so’. We thus seek a theoretically sound analysis, which is partly similar to Tomioka (2008) in that it resorts to the course of derivation for an account of ellipsis, but crucially differs from Tomioka (2008) in that it takes pro-usages of VP rather than E-feature into serious consideration in the account of sloppy readings available to elliptical VPs. The proposed analysis further implies that not only inflectional features but lexical features (in some limited contexts) can be ignored in the computation of identity for VP ellipsis.

Keywords: VP ellipsis, pro-form, LF structure, PF deletion, LF copying, strict/sloppy reading, pro-usages, lexical features, inflectional features
References
1. Bach, E and H. P. Barbara 1980. Anaphora and semantic structure. In J. Kreiman and E. O. Almerindo, eds., Papers from the Parasession on Pronouns and Anaphora, 1-28. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
2. Chomsky, N and H. Lasnik. 1993. Principles and parameter theory. In A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld and T. Vennemann, eds. Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, 506-569. Berlin: de Gruyter.
3. Elbourne, P. 2001. E-type anaphora as NP deletion. Natural Language Semantics 9, 241-288.
4. Fiengo, R and R. May. 1994. Indices and Identity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Fox, D. 2000. Economy and Semantic Interpretation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Goldberg, L. 2005. Verb-stranding VP Ellipsis: A Cross-linguistic Study. Doctoral dissertation, McGill University.
7. Hardt, D. 1993. Verb Phrase Elipsis: Form, Meaning and Processing. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
8. Hardt, D. 1999. Dynamic interpretation of verb phrase ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 22, 185-219.
9. Johnson, K. 2001. What VP ellipsis can do, and what it can’t, but not why. In M. Baltin and C. Collins, eds., The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, 439-479. Oxford: Blackwell.
10. Klein, E. 1986. VP ellipsis in DR theory. In J. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh and M. Stokhof, eds., Studies in DRT and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers, 161-187. Dordrecht: Foris.
11. Larson, R. 2009. Grammar as Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Lobeck, A. 1995. Ellipsis: Functional Heads, Licensing and Identification. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Merchant, J. 2001. The syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands, and the Theory of Ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Park, M-K. 2006. Morphological/inflectional strict vs. sloppy identity in RNR constructions: Towards a midway coordination analysis. Studies in Generative Grammar 16-1, 175-191.
15. Romero, M. 1998. Focus and Reconstruction Effects in wh-phrases. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
16. Rooth, Mats E. 1981. A comparison of three theories of verb phrase ellipsis. In W. Chao and D. Wheeler, eds., University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 212-244. GLSA.
17. Rooth, Mats E. 1992a. Ellipsis redundancy and reduction redundancy. In S. Berman and A. Hestvik, eds., Proceedings of the Stuttgart Ellipsis Workshop, Stuttgart.
18. Schwarz, B. 2000. Topics in Ellipsis. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
19. Tomioka, S. 2008. A step-by-step guide to ellipsis resolution. In K. Johnson, ed., Topics in Ellipsis, 210-228, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Vendler, Z. 1957. Verbs and times. Philosophical Review 56, 143-160. Reprinted, 1967 in Linguistics in Philosophy, 97-121. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.