The Korean Association for the Study of English Language and Linguistics

Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 19 , No. 3

[ Article ]
Korea Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 407-431
Abbreviation: KASELL
ISSN: 1598-1398 (Print)
Print publication date 30 Sep 2019
Received 16 Aug 2019 Revised 10 Sep 2019 Accepted 19 Sep 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.19.3.201909.407

Overpassivization of English Unaccusatives Revisited: A Look Behind the Scenes
Jungeun Choi
Researcher, Center for Educational Research Seoul National University 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, Korea (choi7541@snu.ac.kr)


Abstract

This paper examines what causes Korean learners of English to struggle to acquire English unaccusative constructions by investigating the learners’ decisions in a grammaticality judgment test. Unlike other related studies, this paper took a closer look behind the test results in order to reveal what lies in learners’ overpassivization of these forms. It also considered differences among English language proficiency levels in the sources of overpassivization errors. A total of 67 Korean learners of English participated in the study, and some of them were asked for a retrospective interview based on their answers in the test. The results showed that overpassivization depended on the inherent verb types and the presence of passive morphemes in L1 translation. Moreover, the effects of such factors differed according to L2 proficiency. As for the learners’ underlying mechanism for the construction, three primary causes were found: the conceptual presence of external causers, the inanimacy of the subject, the knowledge of lexical items. Based on the results, pedagogical implications are suggested.


Keywords: English unaccusatives, overpassivization, source of errors, Korean learners of English

References
1. Ahn, J. H. 2015. L1 Korean L2 English learners’ overpassivization errors with unaccusative verbs. Korean Journal of Linguistics 40(4), 633-660.
2. Balcom, P. 1997. Why is this happened? Passive morphology and unaccusativity. Second Language Research 13, 1-9.
3. Bowerman, M. 1983. How do children avoid constructing an overly general grammar in the absence of feedback about what is not a sentence? Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 22. Stanford University, Department of Linguistics. Stanford: CA.
4. Burzio, L. 1986. Italian Syntax: A Government-binding Approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.
5. Chen, M. Y. 2012. Animacies: Biopolitics, Racial Mattering, and Queer Affect. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
6. Chung, T. 2011. The input of L2 English unaccusative verbs: EFL textbooks and teachers’ knowledge. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics 11(2), 437-464.
7. Chung, T. 2015. L2 acquisition of English unaccusative verbs: A longitudinal study. English Teaching 70(4), 3-26.
8. Chung, T. 2016. L1 influence and interface effects in L2 English unaccusatives. English Teaching 71(4), 75-104.
9. Croft, W. 1995. Modern syntactic typology. In M. Shibatani and T. Bynon, eds., Approaches to Language Typology, 85-144. New York: Clarendon Press.
10. Han, H. 2011. L1 Morphological Influence in the L2 Acquisition of English Unaccusatives. Master’s thesis, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
11. Han, Z. 2006. Fossilization: Can grammaticality judgment be a reliable source of evidence? In Z. Han and T. Odlin, eds., Studies of Fossilization in Second Language Acquisition, 56-82. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
12. Hwang, J.-B. 1999a. L2 acquisition of English unaccusative verbs under implicit and explicit learning conditions. English Teaching 54(4), 145-176.
13. Hwang, J.-B. 1999b. Learnability and the L2 development of English unaccusative verbs. Journal of the Applied Linguistics Association of Korea 15(2), 65-87.
14. Hwang, J.-B. 2001. Focus on form and the L2 learning of English unaccusative verbs. English Teaching 56(3), 111-133.
15. Hwang, J.-B. 2006. Why do Korean EFL learners overpassivize English unaccusative verbs? English Language Teaching 18(1), 195-221.
16. Ju, M. K. 2000. Overpassivization errors by second language learners: The effect of conceptualizable agents in discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22(1), 85-111.
17. Juffs, A. 1996. Learnability and the Lexicon: Theories and Second Language Acquisition Research. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
18. Kim, E. 2004. Difficulty hierarchy of English unaccusative verbs for Korean learners. Foreign Languages Education 11(2), 101-123.
19. Kim, J.-T. 2006. Unaccusativity and L2 passive construction. English Language & Literature Teaching 12(4), 69-89.
20. Kim, J.-T. 2007. Semantic aspects in L2 English overpassivization. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal 15(4), 55-76.
21. Kim, J.-E. 2010. The effects of verb alternation and L1 transfer on overpassivizing English unaccusative constructions. Journal of the Korea English Education Society 9(3), 53-74.
22. Kim, W. Y. 2003. The L2 acquisition of English unaccusative verbs by Korean EFL learners. English Language Teaching 15(3), 203-221.
23. Kondo, T. 2005. Overpassivization in second language acquisition. IRAL 43(2), 129-161.
24. Kong, S. 2018. Unaccusative and unergative verbs in L2 English. The Journal of Chinese Linguistics 46(1), 199-225.
25. Lee, J.-H. 2007. Learnability of English transitivity alternations for Korean EFL learners. Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics 23(2), 99-123.
26. Lee, H and I. Choi. 2011. What causes overpassivization? The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal 19(3), 91-107.
27. Levin, B., and M. Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
28. Montrul, S. 2000. Transitivity alternations in L2 acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22, 229-273.
29. Montrul, S. 2005. On knowledge and development of unaccusativity in Spanish L2 acquisition. Linguistics 43(6), 1153-1190.
30. No, G. and T. Chung. 2006. Multiple effects and the learnability of English unaccusatives. English Teaching 61(1), 19-39.
31. Oh, M. 2014. A corpus study of overpassivization in Korean EFL learners’ English writings. Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics 30(3), 179-196.
32. Okamoto, A. 2010. Overpassivization errors in L2 Japanese. In J. Costa,, A. Castro, M. Lobo and F. Pratas, eds., Language Acquisition and Development: Proceedings of GALA 2009, 342-352. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
33. Oshita, H. 2000. What is happened may not be what appears to be happening: A corpus study of ‘passive’ unaccusatives in L2 English. Second Language Research 16(4), 293-324.
34. Oshita, H. 2001. The unaccusative trap in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23, 279-304.
35. Owada, K. 2017. Examining Japanese EFL learners’ sensitivity to unaccusative verbs through animation-based acceptability judgment and composition. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics 21(2), 55-71.
36. Pae, H. K., B. Schanding, Y.-J. Kwon and Y.-W. Lee. 2014. Animacy effect and language specificity: Judgment of unaccusative verbs by Korean learners of English as a foreign language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 43, 187-207.
37. Perlmutter, D. 1978. Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting, Berkely Linguistics Society, 157-189.
38. Shin, J.-A. 2011. Overpassivization errors in Korean college students’ English writings. Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics 27(3), 255-273.
39. Rutherford, W. 1987. Second Language Grammar: Learning and Teaching. London: Longman.
40. Yang, H. 2007. The acquisition of English transitivity alternation verbs by Korean EFL college students. Foreign Languages Education 14(4), 301-328.
41. Yip, V. 1990. Interlanguage ergative constructions and learnability. CUHK Papers in Linguistics 2, 45-68.
42. Yip, V. 1995. Interlanguage and Learnability: From Chinese to English. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
43. Yuan, B. 1999. Acquiring the unaccusative/unergative distinction in a second language: Evidence from English-speaking learners of L2 Chinese. Linguistics 37(2), 275-296.
44. Zobl, H. 1989. Canonical structures and ergativity. In S. M. Gass and J. Schachter, eds., Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition, 203-221. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45. Zyzik, E. 2006. Transitivity alternations and sequence learning: Insights from L2 Spanish production data. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28, 449-485.