The Korean Association for the Study of English Language and Linguistics

Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 21
[Paper List] [Goto Volume List]

[ Article ]
Korea Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 21, No. 0, pp. 1060-1084
Abbreviation: KASELL
ISSN: 1598-1398 (Print) 2586-7474 (Online)
Received 09 Oct 2021 Revised 20 Oct 2021 Accepted 28 Oct 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.21..202110.1060

The Effect of L2 Proficiency, L1 Congruency, and Collocation Frequency on L2 Collocation Processing: An Experimental Study of Korean EFL Learners
Shinwoong Lee
Professor, Dept. of English Language and Literature, Hanyang University 222 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, Korea (shinwoonglee@hanyang.ac.kr)


© 2021 KASELL All rights reserved
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Funding Information ▼
Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to examine how L2 proficiency, L1 congruency, and collocation frequency influenced the processing of English collocations and to see whether there existed interaction effects among the variables. Fifty Korean EFL university students and twenty native speakers of English in Korea participated in the current study. An acceptability judgment task was utilized in the experiment in which the participants were asked to decide whether the English expressions given were appropriate or not, and their error rates on and reaction times to the collocations were measured. It was revealed that there existed a significant effect of collocation frequency, L2 proficiency, and L1 congruency on the processing of the English collocations. It was also found that L1 influence on the error rate and the reaction time appears to wane as the level of English proficiency enhances and the collocation frequency increases. The findings suggested that EFL learners may be able to develop the intralexical knowledge of L2 collocations departing from L1 mediation as their English proficiency enhances and they are exposed to more L2 input.

Keywords: L2 collocation processing, frequency effect, L1 influence, L2 proficiency, reaction time, error rate, acceptability judgement task
Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Hanyang Research Fund (2020). I am truly grateful to anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments on an earlier version of this paper.

References
1. Browne, C., B. Culligan and J. Philips. 2013. The new general service list. Retrieved from http://www.newgeneralservicelist.org
2. Chon, Y. and D. Shin. 2009. Collocations in L2 writing and rater’s perceived writing proficiency. Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics 25(1), 101-129.
3. Chon, Y. and S. Lee. 2015. L2 collocational knowledge by congruency and writing proficiency of EFL university learners. English Language and Literature Teaching 21(1), 49-74.
4. Conklin, K. and N. Schmitt. 2008. Formulaic sequences: Are they processed more quickly than nonformulaic language by native and nonnative speakers? Applied Linguistics 29(1), 72-89.
5. Conklin, K. and N. Schmitt. 2012. The processing of formulaic language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 4-61.
6. Durrant, P. and A. Doherty. 2010. Are high-frequency collocations psychologically real?: Investigating the thesis of collocational priming. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 6(2), 125-155.
7. Durrant P. and N. Schmitt. 2010. Adult learners’ retention of collocations from exposure. Second Language Research, 16(2), 163-188.
8. Ellis, N. 2001. Memory for language. In P. Robinson, ed., Cognition and Second Lnguage Instruction, 38-68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Ellis, N., R. Simpson-Vlach and C. Maynard. 2008. Formulaic language in native and second-language speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 41(3), 375-396.
10. Erman, B. and B. Warren. 2000. The idiom principle and the open-choice principle. Text 20, 29-62.
11. Fan, M. 2009. An exploratory study of collocational use by ESL students: A task-based approach. System (37), 110-123.
12. Foster, P. 2001. Rules and routines: A consideration of their role in the task-based language production of native and non-native speakers. In B. Martin, P. Skehan and M. Swain eds., Researching Pedagogic Tasks: Second Language Learning, Teaching and Testing, 145-160. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Hoey, M. 2005. Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge.
14. Hsu, J. 2007. Lexical collocations and their relations to the online writing of Taiwanese college English majors and non-English majors. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching 4(2), 192-209.
15. Jiang, N. 2000. Lexical representation and development in a second language. Applied Linguistics 21(1), 47-77.
16. Jiang, N. 2002. Form-meaning mapping in vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24, 617-637.
17. Jiang, N. 2004. Semantic transfer and its implications for vocabulary teaching in a second language. The Modern Language Journal 88(3), 416-432.
18. Jiang, N and N. Tatiana. 2007. The processing of formulaic sequences by second language speakers. The Modern Language Journal 91(3), 433-445.
19. Kroll, J., E. Michael, N. Tokowicz and R. Dufour. 2002. The development of lexical fluency in a second language. 2002. Second Language Research 18(2), 137-171.
20. Kellerman, E. 1979. Transfer and non-transfer: Where we are now. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2(1), 37-57.
21. Kim, H. and H. Yoon. 2008. Effect of predictability in L1 on the use of the L2 verb-noun collocations. English Teaching 63(2), 237-259.
22. Kim, J. and Y. Cho. 2010. A study of the relationship between collocational knowledge and lexical knowledge/general English proficiency: Focus on synonyms of verbs and adjectives. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics 10(3), 447-471.
23. Kim, K. 2012. L1 influence on L2 collocational knowledge: By level of receptive vocabulary knowledge and general language proficiency. Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics 28(3), 1-38.
24. Kim, Y. and J. Ma. 2011. The effect of collocation-based instruction on L1 Korean high school students’ English vocabulary acquisition. English Language and Literature Teaching 17(3), 141-159.
25. Kroll, J. and E. Stewart. 1994. Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language 33, 149-174.
26. Kroll, J., E. Michael, N. Tokowicz and R. Dufour. 2002. The development of lexical fluency in a second language. Second Language Research 18(2), 137-171.
27. Laufer, B. and T. Waldman. 2011. Verb-noun collocations in second language writing: A corpus analysis of learners’ English. Language Learning 61(2), 647-672.
28. Lee, S. 2015. Korean EFL learners’ productive collocation knowledge and its relationship to their writing proficiency. English Language and Literature Teaching 21(4), 59-84.
29. Lee, S. 2016. L1 influence on the processing of L2 collocation: An experimental study of Korean EFL leaners. Linguistic Research 33(special edition), 137-163.
30. Nation, P. 2013. Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Nattinger, J. and J. DeCarrico, 1992. Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Nesselhauf, N. 2003. The use of collocations by advanced learners of English and some implications for teaching. Applied Linguistics 24(2), 223-242.
33. Park, S. and J. Lee. 2011. Effects of collocation-based vocabulary instruction on high school students’ writing ability. The Journal of Studies in Language 27(3), 445-466.
34. Pawley, A. and F. Syder. 1983. Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In J. Richards and R. Schmidt, eds., Language and Communication, 191-225. London: Longman.
35. Phoocharoensil, S. 2013. Cross-linguistic influence: Its impact on L2 English collocation production. English Language Teaching 6(1), 1-10.
36. Sadeghi, K. 2009. Collocational differences between L1 and L2: Implications for EFL learners and teachers. TESL Canada Journal 26(2), 100-124.
37. Schmitt, N. and R. Carter. 2004. Formulaic sequences in action: An introduction. In N. Schmitt, ed., Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing and Use, 1-22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
38. Shokouhi, H. and G. Mirsalari. 2010. Collocational knowledge versus general linguistic knowledge among Iranian EFL learners. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language 13(4), 1-24.
39. Wolter, B. and H. Gyllstad. 2011. Collocational links in the L2 mental lexicon and the influence of L1 intralexical knowledge. Applied Linguistics 32(4), 430-449.
40. Wolter, B. and H. Gyllstad. 2013. Frequency of input and L2 collocational processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35, 451-482.
41. Wolter, B. and J. Yamashita. 2018. Word frequency, collocational frequency, L1 congruency, and proficiency in L2 collocational processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 40, 395-416.
42. Wray, A. 2002. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Yamashita, J. and N. Jiang. 2010. L1 influence on the acquisition of L2 collocations: Japanese ESL users and EFL learners acquiring English collocations. TESOL Quarterly 44(4), 647-668.