The Korean Association for the Study of English Language and Linguistics

Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 23
[Paper List] [Goto Volume List]

[ Article ]
Korea Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 23, No. 0, pp. 342-357
Abbreviation: KASELL
ISSN: 1598-1398 (Print) 2586-7474 (Online)
Received 24 Mar 2023 Revised 13 Apr 2023 Accepted 15 May 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.23..202305.342

Korean EFL Learners’ Underuse of the English Perfect: A Collostructional Analysis of Written Learner Corpora
Kang San Noh ; Sanghoun Song
(1st author) Graduate Student, Dept. of Linguistics, Korea Univ., Tel: +82-2-3290-1648 (kasan1998@korea.ac.kr)
(corresponding author) Associate Professor, Dept. of Linguistics, Korea Univ., Tel: +82-2-3290-2177 (sanghoun@korea.ac.kr)


© 2023 KASELL All rights reserved
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Funding Information ▼
Abstract

This study examines whether and how Korean EFL learners underuse verbal lexemes as the English perfect using a series of corpus-based methods involving two written learner corpora, which amount to 3,590,194 words in total. It is difficult to detect which forms are significantly underused by language learners because the underused patterns are such that the learners avoid producing them in the data and are therefore less visible, unlike the overused patterns. Accordingly, the current work performs collostructional analysis to measure the association strength between the perfect construction and the specific verbal lexemes, thereby demonstrating that collostructional analysis works effectively to reveal the underused patterns in the language learners’ data. The collostructional analysis reveals that 416 verbal lexemes were underused while only 4 verbal lexemes were overused. It is proposed that this underuse behavior of Korean EFL learners might result from the lack of grammatical markers for the perfect in Korean and the use of temporal adverbials. Along this line of research, this paper proposes the effectiveness of collostructional analysis in measuring associations and potential pedagogical implications.

Keywords: association strength, collostructional analysis, English perfect, learner corpora, underuse
Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Korea University Insung Research Grant.

References
1. Bardovi-Harlig, K. 1992. The use of adverbials and natural order in the development of temporal expression. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 30(4), 299–320.
2. Binnick, R. 1991. Time and the Verb. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
3. Carlstrom, B and P. Nathan. 2012. The Gachon Learner Corpus. Retrieved from http://koreanlearnercorpusblog.blogspot.kr/p/corpus.html
4. Choi, J. 2018. Use of the present perfect by Korean learners of English: A descriptive case study. Foreign Languages Education 25(3), 23–51.
5. Dagut, M. and B. Laufer. 1985. Avoidance of phrasal verbs – A case for contrastive analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 7(1), 73–79.
6. Davies, M. 2008. The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 560 million words, 1990-Present. Retrieved from https://corpus.byu.edu/coca/.
7. Flickinger, D. 2000. On building a more efficient grammar by exploiting types. Natural Language Engineering 6(1), 15–28.
8. Flickinger, D. and J. Yu. 2013. Toward more precision in correction of grammatical errors. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning: Shared Task, 68-73.
9. Gilquin, G. 2015. The use of phrasal verbs by French-speaking EFL learners. A constructional and collostructional corpus-based approach. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 11(1), 51-88.
10. Goldberg, A. E. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11. Gries, S. T. 2019. 15 years of collostructions: Some long overdue additions/corrections (To/of actually all sorts of corpus-linguistics measures). International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24(3), 385–412.
12. Gries, S. T. 2022. What so (some of) our association measures measure (most)? Association? Journal of Second Language Studies 5(1), 1–33.
13. Gries, S. T. and N. C. Ellis. 2015. Statistical measures for usage-based linguistics. Language Learning 65(Supplement 1), 1–28.
14. Huddleston, R. 1988. English Grammar: An Outline. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. Hulstijn, J. H. and E. Marchena. 1989. Avoidance: grammatical or semantic causes? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11(3), 241–255.
16. Jespersen, O. 1924. The Philosophy of Grammar (Reprint). New York: Norton.
17. Kim, C. G. 1999. Tense Structure & Aspect Recognition of Korean. Seoul: Taehaksa.
18. Klein, W. 1992. The present-perfect puzzle. Language 68(3), 525–552.
19. Kleinmann, H. H. 1977. Avoidance behavior in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning 27(1), 93–107.
20. Kweon, S. O. 2006. Avoidance of phrasal verbs by Korean EFL learners. Studies in Modern Grammar 44, 175-197.
21. Laufer, B. 2000. Avoidance of idioms in a second language: The effect of L1-L2 degree of similarity. Studia Linguistica 54(2), 186–196.
22. Lee, J. and M. K. Kang. 2013. An English tense and aspect comprehension for effective communicative improvement focused on present perfect aspect and past tense. The Korean Association of Language Studies 18(1), 163–180.
23. Manning, C. and H. Schutze. 2000. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. McCoard, R. W. 1978. The English Perfect: Tense Choice and Pragmatic Inferences. North-Holland: Amsterdam.
25. Meisel, J. 1987. Reference to past events and actions in the development of natural second language acquisition. In B. MacWhinney, ed., First and Second Language Acquisition Processes, 206-224. New York, NY: Newbury House.
26. Michaelis, L. A. 1993. Toward a Grammar of Aspect: The Case of the English Perfect Construction. Doctoral dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, CA, USA.
27. Murakami, A. 2013. Individual variation and the role of L1 in the L2 development of English grammatical morphemes: Insights from learner corpora. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
28. Packard, W. 2015. Full forest treebanking. Master’s thesis, University of Washington, WA, USA.
29. Park, M. and M. H. Choe. 2013. Advanced Korean EFL learners’ use of the English simple past and present perfect in controlled contexts. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal 21(4), 119-145.
30. R Core Team, 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna.
31. Rhee, S. C. and C. K. Jung. 2012. Yonsei English Learner Corpus (YELC). Proceedings of the First Yonsei English Corpus Symposium, 26-36.
32. Ritz, M. E. 2012. Perfect tense and aspect. In R. I. Binnick, ed., The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect, 881-907. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
33. Sardinha, T. B. 2000. Comparing corpora with WordSmith Tools: How large must the reference corpus be? Proceedings of the Workshop on Comparing Corpora, 7–13.
34. Schumann, J. H. 1987. The expression of temporality in Basilang speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 9(1), 21-41.
35. Shin, H. S. and S. Y. Chung. 2013. A study of English teaching methods on present perfect tense through comparison with past tense. Journal of British & American Language and Literature 29(1), 49–69.
36. Smith, K. L. 1982. Avoidance, overuse, and misuse: Three trial and error learning strategies of second language learners. Hispania 65(4), 605-609.
37. Song, S. and E. Oh. 2021. A multimethod approach to Korean speakers’ acquisition of unaccusativity in English. Journal of Cognitive Science 22(1), 135–186.
38. Stefanowitsch, A. and S. T. Gries. 2003. Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2), 209–243.
39. Sung, M. C. 2020. Underuse of English verb–particle constructions in an L2 learner corpus: Focus on structural patterns and one-word preference. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 16(1), 189-214.
40. Suppes, P., T. Liang, E. E. Macken and D. P. Flickinger. 2014. Positive technological and negative pre-test-score effects in a four-year assessment of low socioeconomic status k-8 student learning in computer-based math and language arts courses. Computers & Education 71, 23–32.
41. Vendler, Z. 1957. Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66(2), 143-160.
42. Yang, Y. J. 2017. A syntactic & semantic analysis on perfective aspect of English & Korean. The Mirae Journal of English Language and Literature 22(2), 107-127.
43. Yoon, W. J. 2000. A study on the function and use of English perfect tense in discourse. Journal on English Language Teaching 12(1), 295–314.
44. Zhang, R. 2014. Overuse and underuse of English concluding connectives: A corpus study. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 5(1), 121–126.