The Korean Association for the Study of English Language and Linguistics

Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 23

[ Article ]
Korea Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 23, No. 0, pp. 713-731
Abbreviation: KASELL
ISSN: 1598-1398 (Print) 2586-7474 (Online)
Received 05 Aug 2023 Revised 27 Aug 2023 Accepted 09 Sep 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.23..202309.713

Against Anti-Locality in A’-Movement
Yeon-Seung Kim
Professor, Department of English Language and Literature, Kongju National University, Tel: 041) 850-8362 (yskim@kongju.ac.kr)


© 2023 KASELL All rights reserved
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Funding Information ▼

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to declare that anti-locality based on the Spec-to-Spec Anti-Locality (SSAL) is not effective in accounting for that-trace effects. It is illustrated that there are many pieces of conceptual and empirical evidence against the SSAL. Accordingly, the anti-locality account for that-trace effects cannot be accepted. This paper proposes that what is crucial in alleviating that-trace effects is the property of intervening elements between CP and TP, not just the SSAL. Unfortunately this paper does not provide a comprehensive account covering all the examples regarding the adverb effect, topic islands, and fronted focus elements. With a simple conclusion that the anti-locality approach can never account for that-trace effects, we are looking forward to an analysis attributing a difference in the property of intervening elements between CP and TP to a structural difference based on a refined CP structure.


Keywords: anti-locality, successive cyclicity, ordering paradox, phase, Spec-to-Spec Anti-Locality, that-trace effects

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the research grant of Kongju National University in 2022.


References
1. Bošković, Ž. 1994. D-structure, θ-theory, and movement into θ–positions. Linguistic Analysis 24, 247-286.
2. Bošković, Ž. 1997. The Syntax of Nonfinite Complementation: An Economy Approach. Cambridge: MIT Press.
3. Brillman, R. J. and A. Hirsch. 2016. An anti-locality account of English subject/non-subject asymmetries. Ms. MIT.
4. Browning, M. A. 1996. CP recursion and that-t effects. Linguistic Inquiry 27, 237-255.
5. Chomsky, N. 2001. Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstovicz. ed., Ken Hale: A Life in Language, 1-52. Cambridge: MIT Press.
6. Chomsky, N. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In A. Belletti, ed., Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. vol. 3, 104-131. New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Chomsky, N. 2008. On phases. In R. Freidin, C. P. Otero, and M.-L. Zubizaretta, eds., Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory, 132-166. Cambridge: MIT Press.
8. Chomsky, N. and H. Lasnik. 1977. Filters and control. Linguistic Inquiry 8, 425-504.
9. Chung, S. and J. McCloskey. 1983. On the interpretation of certain island fact in GPSG. Linguistic Inquiry 14, 704-713.
10. Culicover, P. W. 1991. Polarity, inversion and focus in English. In Proceedings of the 8th Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, 46-68.
11. Culicover, P. W. 1993. Evidence against ECP accounts of the that-t effect. Linguistic Inquiry 24, 557-561.
12. Doherty, C. 1997. Clauses without complementizers: Finite IP complementation in English. The Linguistic Review 14, 197-220.
13. Douglas, J. 2017. Unifying the that-trace and anti-that-trace effects. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 2 60, 1-28.
14. Engdahl. E. 1983. Parasitic gaps. Linguistics and Philosophy 6, 5-34.
15. Erlewine, M. 2014. Anti-locality and Kaqchikel agent focus. Proceedings of the 31th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 150-159.
16. Erlewine, M. 2017. Why the null complementizer is special in complementizer-trace effects. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 80, 371-380.
17. Fox, D. and D. Pesetsky. 2005. Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure. Theoretical Linguistics 31, 1-45.
18. Grohmann, K. K. 2003. Prolific domains: On the anti-locality of movement dependencies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
19. Grohmann, K. K. 2011. Anti-locality: Too-close relations in grammar. In C. Boeckx, ed., Linguistic Minimalism. 260-290. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Haegeman, L. 2003. Notes on long adverbial fronting in English and the left periphery. Linguistic Inquiry 34, 640-649.
21. Haegeman, L. and J. Guéron. 1999. English Grammar: A Generative Perspective. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.
22. Ishii, T. 1997. An asymmetry in the composition of phrase structure and its consequences. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
23. Ishii, T. 2004. The phase impenetrability condition, the vacuous movement hypothesis, and that-trace effects. Lingua 114, 183-215.
24. Kayne, R. 1981. ECP extensions. Linguistic Inquiry 12, 93-133.
25. Lasnik, H. and M. Saito. 1984. On the nature of proper government. Linguistic Inquiry 15, 237-289.
26. McCloskey, J. 2000. Quantifier float and wh-movement in an Irish English. Linguistic Inquiry 31, 57-84.
27. Nissenbaum, J. 2000. Investigations of Covert Phrase Movement. MIT dissertation.
28. Pesetsky, D. 1982. Complementizer-trace phenomena and the nominative island condition. The Linguistic Review 1, 297-345.
29. Pesetsky, D. 2017. Complementizer-trace effects. In M. Everaert and H. van Riemsdijk, eds., The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax (2nd edition), 1-34. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
30. Pesetsky, D. and E. Torrego. 2001. T-to-C movement: Causes and consequences. In M. Kenstowicz, ed., Ken Hale: A Life in Language. 355-426. Cambridge: MIT Press.
31. Radford. A. 2009. An Introduction to English Sentence Structure. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32. Rizzi, L. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman, ed., Elements of Grammar. 289-330. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
33. Rizzi, L. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In A. Belletti, ed., Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol.3. 223-251. New York: Oxford University Press.
34. Rizzi, L. and U. Shlonsky. 2007. Strategies of subject extraction. In U. Sauerland and H-M. Gartner, eds., Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the View from Syntax-Semantics. 115-160. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
35. Saito, M. and K. Murasugi. 1999. N-deletion in Japanese. University of Connecticut Working Papers in Linguistics 3, 87-107.
36. Sobin, N. 1987. The variable status of COMP-trace phenomena. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5, 33-60.
37. Sobin, N. 2002. The Comp-trace effect, the adverb effect and minimal CP. Journal of Linguistics 38, 527-560.