The Korean Association for the Study of English Language and Linguistics
[ Article ]
Korea Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 24, No. 0, pp.1121-1147
ISSN: 1598-1398 (Print) 2586-7474 (Online)
Print publication date 31 Jan 2024
Received 27 Aug 2024 Revised 23 Sep 2024 Accepted 25 Oct 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.24..202410.1121

생성형 AI 포털 뤼튼을 활용한 초등영어 쓰기 수업의 효과 및 개선

정서현 ; 안경자
서울홍제초등학교
서울교육대학교
Effectiveness and improvement strategies of elementary English writing lessons using the Generative AI Portal WRTN
Seohyun Jeong ; Kyungja Ahn
(1st author) Teacher, Seoul Hongje Elementary School, Tel: 02-396-7235 jshyun84@sen.go.kr
(corresponding author) Professor, Dept. of English Education, Seoul National University of Education, Tel: 02-3475-2565 kjahn@snue.ac.kr


© 2024 KASELL All rights reserved
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the impact of teaching English writing using the Generative AI Portal WRTN on elementary learners’ writing abilities and affective domain. Additionally, it explores the challenges learners face during lessons and the strategies implemented to overcome these difficulties. The analyses were also conducted based on students’ writing levels. A total of 41 sixth-grade students from two classes participated in eight writing lessons over four months. The data included an initial student information survey, pre- and post-writing tests, pre-and post-affective-domain surveys, student logs, student interviews, and a teacher journal. The data were analyzed using both quantitative and qualitative methods within a mixed-methods approach. The major findings are as follows: (1) The English lessons utilizing the generative AI WRTN had positive effects on learners’ English writing achievement, particularly in free-writing tasks. (2) The lessons contributed to improvements in students’ interest, motivation, confidence, and anxiety related to English writing, with variations observed across different writing skills and affective factors depending on students’ writing levels. (3) Learners faced distinct challenges according to their writing levels. Higher-level students struggled with time management, which was mitigated by pre-class preparation of the AI tool. Intermediate-level students had difficulty understanding the AI’s feedback on complex grammatical issues, which was resolved by adjusting the difficulty level of the responses. Lower-level students experienced challenges in selecting appropriate vocabulary, which was addressed through teacher guidance and modified AI commands. The study provides significant implications for integrating generative AI into English writing instruction.

Keywords:

generative AI, WRTN, ChatGPT, primary school English, writing instruction, primary school English learners

Acknowledgments

This paper is based on the first author’s master’s thesis.

References

  • 교육부(Ministry of Education). 2022. 영어과 교육과정(English National Curriculum). 세종: 교육부(Sejong: Ministry of Education).
  • 김민지·김태은(Kim, M.-J. and T.-E. Kim). 2020. 2015 개정 5∼6학년군 초등 영어 교과서의 쓰기 활동 분석(An analysis of writing activities of 5th and 6th grade English textbooks for the 2015 revised national curriculum). ≪초등영어교육≫(Primary English Education) 26-3, 5-28. [https://doi.org/10.25231/pee.2020.26.3.5]
  • 김보영·안경자(Kim, B. and K. Ahn). 2020. 그래픽 조직자를 활용한 쓰기 수업이 영어 학습자의 쓰기 능력, 상위인지전략, 정의적 측면에 미치는 효과(Effects of writing lessons using graphic organizers on English learners’ writing abilities, meta-cognitive strategies, and affective aspects). ≪영어학≫(Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics) 20, 307-334. [https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.20..202008.307]
  • 김은송·안경자(Kim, E. and K. Ahn). 2023. 초등영어 수업 설계와 교수학습에서 ChatGPT의 활용 가능성 탐색(Exploring the potential of utilizing ChatGPT in elementary English lesson planning and English language teaching). ≪초등영어교육≫(Primary English Education) 29-4, 59-87. [https://doi.org/10.25231/pee.2023.29.4.59]
  • 노경희(No, K.-H.). 2021. 미래형 초등영어 교육과정을 위한 제언: 학습자 맞춤형 교육을 중심으로(Suggestions for a future-oriented elementary English curriculum: Focused on learner-centered education). ≪한국초등교육≫(The Journal of Korean Elementary Education) 32-3, 151-165.
  • 서울특별시교육청(Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education). 2023. 초등학교용 서울형 인공지능 윤리교육자료(Seoul-style AI Ethics Education Materials for Elementary School). 서울: 서울특별시교육청(Seoul: Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education).
  • 신동광(Shin, D.-K.). 2023. 유도(guided) 쓰기 활동에서 ChatGPT의 활용 방안(How to use ChatGPT in guided writing activities). ≪영어교과교육≫(Journal of the Korea English Education Society) 22-2, 197-217.
  • 신동광·정혜경·이용상(Shin, D., H. Jung and Y. Lee). 2023. 내용중심 영어 교수 학습의 도구로서 ChatGPT의 활용 가능성 탐색(Exploring the potential of using ChatGPT as a content-based English learning and teaching tool). ≪영어교과교육≫(Journal of the Korea English Education Society) 22-1, 171-192.
  • 신주은·박판우·배영권(Shin, J.-E., P.-W. Park, and Y.-K. Bae). 2023. 생성형 인공지능의 교육적 도입에 대한 내러티브 검토(A narrative review of the educational introduction of generative AI). ≪정보교육학회논문지≫(Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education) 27-6, 665-681. [https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2023.27.6.665]
  • 신현영·신승기(Shin, H.-Y. and S.-G. Shin). 2023. 초거대언어모델 프롬프트의 교육적 활용 사례 연구: 2022 개정 교육과정 초등학교 5∼6학년군을 중심으로(A case study on the educational use of large language model prompts: Focusing on the 2022 Revised Curriculum for 5th-6th grades in elementary school). ≪정보교육학회논문지≫(Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education) 27-6, 705-715. [https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2023.27.6.705]
  • 이송은(Lee, S.-E.). 2023. 초등영어 쓰기 교육의 최근 연구 동향 분석: 한국연구재단 등재지를 중심으로(Current trends in research on primary school writing education in English: Focus on the citation index in Korean journals). ≪한국초등교육≫(Korean Journal of Elementary Education) 34-1, 39-61.
  • 이승민(Lee, S.-M.). 2024. GPT-3.5 언어모델 기반의 초등학교 영어 말하기 교육 사례연구(Case study on Elementary School English Speaking Education based on GPT-3.5 Language Model). ≪교육학회논문지≫(Journal of The Korean Association) 28-1, 27-35. [https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2024.28.1.27]
  • 이인숙·김혜리(Lee, I.-S. and H.-R. Kim). 2015. 초등영어 창의적 쓰기 지도에 관한 실행 연구(A study on the implementation of creative writing instruction in elementary English). ≪영어교육연구≫(English Language Teaching) 27-1, 111-135.
  • 조영환·이지은·임규연·정한호·한인숙(Cho, Y.-H., J.-E. Lee, G.-Y. Lim, H.-H. Jung and I.-S. Han). 2023. 생성형 AI와 함께하는 미래교육: 기계에서 협력 파트너로(Future education with generative AI: From machines to collaborative partners). ≪교육공학연구≫(Journal of Educational Technology) 39-4, 1449-1478. [https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.39.4.1449]
  • 조예진·김정렬(Jo, Y. and J. Kim). 2023. 챗GPT를 활용한 초등 6학년 영어교육의 연역적, 귀납적 어휘학습 효과 비교(Comparative effects of inductive and deductive English vocabulary instruction using ChatGPT). ≪학습자중심교과교육연구≫(Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction) 23-19, 881-896. [https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2023.23.19.881]
  • 조은상(Cho, E.-S.). 2024. 초등학생 대상 생성형 인공지능 활용 교육프로그램의 개발과 적용(Development and Application of an Educational Program Utilizing Generative AI for Elementary Students). 석사학위논문(Master’s thesis), 서울교육대학교(Seoul National University of Education).
  • 조재상(Cho, J-S). 2024. 생성형 AI를 활용한 감상문 쓰기 능력 향상에 관한 연구(A Study on the Improvement of Appreciation Writing Ability Using Generative AI). 석사학위논문(Master’s thesis). 서울교육대학교(Seoul National University of Education).
  • 하지원·안경자(Ha, J.-W. and K. Ahn). 2013. 영상 매체 활용 초등영어 쓰기 수업 모형 개발 및 적용: 학습자의 쓰기 능력 및 태도에의 효과(Development and application of a writing class model using visual media in elementary English: Effects on learners' writing skills and attitudes). ≪현대영어교육≫(Modern English Education) 14-4, 157-184.
  • Brown, H. D. 2007. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (3rd ed). White Plains, NY: Longman.
  • Creswell, J. W. 2003. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Harklau, L. 2002. The role of writing in classroom second language acquisition. Journal of Second Language Writing 11(4), 329-350. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00091-7]
  • Ji, H., I. Han and Y. Ko. 2023. A systematic review of conversational AI in language education: Focusing on the collaboration with human teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 55(1), 48-63. [https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2142873]
  • Kim, S. and S.-H. Park. 2023. Young Korean EFL learners’ perception of role-playing scripts: ChatGPT vs. textbooks. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics 23, 1136-1153. [https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.23..202312.1136]
  • Su, J. and W. Yang. 2023. Unlocking the power of ChatGPT: A framework for applying generative AI in education. ECNU Review of Education 6(3), 355-366. [https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311231168423]
  • Watson, S. and J. Romic. 2024. ChatGPT and the entangled evolution of society, education, and technology: A systems theory perspective. European Educational Research Journal [https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041231221266]
  • WRTN. 2023. WRTN Youth Protection Policy. Available online at https://sso.wrtn.ai/policy/youth?redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fwrtn.ai%2F
  • WRTN. 2024. WRTN Customer Support FAQs: Types of Generation Errors and Solutions. Available online at https://help.wrtn.ai/b67a310a-cc1a-4cd9-9511-904c311c40a0