The Korean Association for the Study of English Language and Linguistics

Current Issue

Korea Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 20

[ Article ]
Korea Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 20, No. 1, pp.335-362
Abbreviation: KASELL
ISSN: 1598-1398 (Print)
Print publication date 31 Mar 2020
Received 14 Aug 2020 Revised 21 Aug 2020 Accepted 31 Aug 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.20..202008.335

한국 대학생의 영작문 피드백 활동에 관한 인식: 자기검토 및 동료 피드백과 컴퓨터 피드백
민주영
호서대학교

Korean university students’ perceptions of feedback activities on English composition: Self-review, peer feedback, and computer feedback
Ju Young Min

Copyright 2020 KASELL
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

This paper aims to explore second language (L2) writing feedback, as a crucial part of L2 writing pedagogy, from an L2 learners perspective in depth. The present study investigated Korean university students’ perceptions of different feedback activities on their English composition. Twenty-five Korean university students enrolled in an English course performed three types of feedback activities: self-review, peer review, and using computer feedback from Grammarly, the online grammar checker. After a series of feedback activities on their first draft written in English, students revised their first draft and then participated in an online survey that asked students’ perceptions of each feedback activity and comparison between feedback activities. The survey results showed students’ specific perceptions including appreciation of and preference for each activity for its value and advantages along with difficulties and limitations. The research findings suggest pedagogical implications and further research on L2 English writing feedback activities for Korean university students.


Keywords: L2 writing feedback, English composition, self-review, peer feedback, computer feedback, Grammarly, learner perception, Korean university student

References
1. 김희정⋅이제영⋅장소영(Kim, H., J. Lee & S. Jang). 2019. 영작문 활동 중 동료 피드백에 대한 예비교사들의 인식(Pre-service teachers perception on peer feedback in English writing). ≪한국콘텐츠학회논문지≫(Journal of the Korea Contents Association) 19-1, 513-523.
2. 문영인(Moon, Y.). 2000. 한국 대학 영작문에 나타나는 동료 수정의 성격(The nature of peer revisions in an EFL writing class of a Korean university). English Teaching 55-1, 119-140.
3. 양재석(Yang, J.). 2016. 한국 대학생의 영어 글쓰기 능력과 글쓰기 전략의 관계에 대한 연구(The relationship between English writing performance and writing strategy use of tertiary students in Korea). ≪영어영문학≫(The Journal of Mirae English Language and Literature) 21-1, 485-506.
4. 이송은(Lee, S.). 2019. 피드백이 영어작문능력에 미치는 영향: 체계적 문헌고찰 및 메타분석(The impact of L2 English writing feedback on English writing competency: Systematic review and meta analysis). ≪학습자중심교과교육연구≫(Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction) 19-8, 749-768.
5. 이지연(Yi, J.). 2010. 한국 대학생의 영작문 활동 시 나타나는 동료피드백의 양상 및 이에 대한 인식(The characteristics of Korean EFL college students’ peer feedback to English writing and their perception of the peer feedback). ≪현대영어교육≫ (Modern English Education) 11-3, 134-161.
6. 정양수(Jung, Y.). 2012. 영어쓰기 과정에서 제공되는 피드백의 유형과 제공방법에 대한 학습자의 요구 분석 연구(A study on the students’ need analysis on the types of feedback and ways of providing feedback in the process of English writing). ≪현대영미어문학≫(The Journal of Modern British & American Language & Literature) 30-1, 31-56.
7. 정양수(Jung, Y.). 2017. 교수자에 따른 영어쓰기 피드백의 유형과 효과에 관한 학습자들의 인식 연구(Learners’ perceptions on feedback types, ways of receiving feedback, and effectiveness on their English writing according to native and non-native instructors). ≪현대영미어문학≫(The Journal of Modern British & American Language & Literature) 35-1, 245-270.
8. 정영철(Chung, Y.). 2014. 통합적 접근: 영어 글쓰기 수업에서의 피드백주기 방식에 대한 대학생들의 인식(An integrated approach-college students’ perceptions of giving feedback in English writing class). ≪현대영미어문학≫(The Journal of Modern British & American Language & Literature) 32-1, 79-101.
9. 정영철(Chung, Y.). 2016. 영작문 수업에서 문자 피드백과 구두 피드백 제공하기: 한국 대학생들의 인식(Giving written and oral feedback in English composition classes: Korean college students’ perceptions). ≪현대영미어문학≫(The Journal of Modern British & American Language & Literature) 34-1, 195-219.
10. 한혜령(Hahn, H.). 2016. 영작문 동료피드백의 정의적 요소(Affective factors underlying peer feedback in L2 English writing). ≪영어어문교육≫(English Language & Literature Teaching) 22-4, 339-367.
11. Barkaoui, K. 2007. Teaching writing to second language learners: Insights from theory and research. TESL Reporter 40(1), 35-48.
12. Berg, E. 1999. The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing 8(3), 215–241.
13. Casanave, C. P. 2004. Controversies in Second Language Writing: Dilemmas and Decisions in Research and Instruction. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
14. Chin, C. 2007. EFL learners’ perceptions on English writing tasks and teacher feedback. English Language & Literature Teaching 13(1), 1-26.
15. Cho, S. 2011. The effects of giving peer feedback: Case studies of Korean learners of English. English Language and Linguistics 17(2), 101-125.
16. Choi, J. 2013. Does peer feedback affect L2 writers’ L2 learning, composition skills, metacognitive knowledge, and L2 writing anxiety? English Teaching 68(3), 187-213.
17. De Guerrero, M. C. M. and O. S. Villamil. 2000. Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal 84(1), 51-68.
18. Hansen, J. G. and J. Liu. 2005. Guiding principles for effective peer response. ELT Journal 59, 31-38.
19. Hyland, F. 1998. The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing 7(3), 255-286.
20. Hyland, F. and K. Hyland. 2001. Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing 10(3), 185-212.
21. Hyland, K. 2003. Second Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Hyland, K. and F. Hyland. 2006. Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching 39, 83-101.
23. Johns, A. 2006. Student self-evaluation and reflection: The I-Search paper. In K. Hyland and F. Hyland, eds., Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues, 162–181. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Kang, D. 2008. Feedback on EFL writing: Teacher, peer, and self-review. Foreign Languages Education 15(1), 1-22.
25. Kang, E. 2019. Effects of peer feedback on L2 student’s writing. Journal of the Korean English Education Society 18(2), 31-49.
26. Kang, E. and Z. Han. 2015. The efficacy of written corrective feedback in improving L2 written accuracy: A meta-analysis. The Modern Language Journal 99(1), 1-18.
27. Kim, B. 2007. Building metalinguisitc awareness through peer feedback in the beginner EFL class. English Teaching 62(4), 169-193.
28. Kim, B. 2009. Examining the effects of trained peer feedback on EFL students’ writing. English Language & Literature Teaching 15(2), 151-168.
29. Kim, H. 2009. The perception change toward feedback in L2 writing: An analysis of graduate students’ writing processes. English Teaching 64(3), 79-105.
30. Kim, H. and J. Kim. 2020. The effect of peer feedback on writing quality in L2 college classes. New Korean Journal of English Language and Literature 62(1), 197-219.
31. Kim, J.-H. 2010. Teacher written feedback: Learner preferences, perceptions, and teacher reflections. English Language & Literature Teaching 16(1), 19-40.
32. Kim, J.-O. 2012. Student perceptions of different feedback givers’ written responses. English Language & Literature Teaching 18(1), 45-68.
33. Kim, T.-E. 2011. Corrective feedback that an automatic writing evaluation system can and cannot provide. English Teaching 66(1), 111-140.
34. Kim, V. 2018. Technology-enhanced feedback on student writing in the English-medium instruction classroom. English Teaching 73(4), 29-53.
35. Koh, W.-Y. 2017. Effective application of automated writing feedback in process-based writing instruction. English Teaching 72(3), 91-118.
36. Li, S. 2010. The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning 60(2), 309-365.
37. Liu, J. and J. Hansen. 2002. Peer Response in Second Language Writing Classrooms. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
38. Lundstrom, K. and W. Baker. 2009. To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 18, 30-43.
39. Min, H. T. 2005. Training students to become successful peer reviewers. System 33(2), 293–308.
40. Moon, Y. and J.-K. Pae. 2011. Short-term effects of automated writing feedback and users evaluation of criterion. Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics 27(4), 125-150.
41. Myers, J. L. 2001. Self-evaluations of the “stream of thought” in journal writing. System 29, 481-488.
42. Myles, J. 2002. Second language writing and research: The writing process and error analysis in student texts. TESL-EJ 6(2). Retrieved from https://www.tesl-ej.org/ej22/a1.html
43. O’Neill, R. and A. M. T. Russell. 2019. Stop! Grammar time: University students’ perceptions of the automated feedback program Grammarly. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 35(1), 42-56.
44. Penn, S. and H.-W. Lim. 2016. Korean English writers’ noticing peer errors and incorporation of peer feedback. English Language & Literature Teaching 22(2), 65-86.
45. Ross, J. A., C. Rolheiser and A. Hogaboam-Gray. 1999. Effects of self-evaluation training on narrative writing. Assessing Writing 6, 107-132.
46. Russell, J. and N. Spada. 2006. The effectiveness of corrective feedback for second language acquisition: A meta-analysis of the research. In J. Norris and L. Ortega, eds., Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching, 131–164. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
47. Suh, J. 2005. Peer feedback interactions in EFL compositions: Written feedback versus oral feedback. English Teaching 60(3), 91-116.
48. Vygotsky, L. 1978. Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49. Ware, P. 2011. Computer-generated feedback on student writing. TESOL Quarterly 45(4), 769-774.
50. Yang, H. 2018. Efficiency of online grammar checker in English writing performance and students’ perceptions. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics 18(3), 328-348.
51. Yoon, K. and J. Lee. 2018. Features and perception of EFL students’ feedback on their peers’ writing. English Language & Literature Teaching 24(3), 69-87.
52. Zimmerman, B. J. and A. Kitsantas. 2002. Acquiring writing revision and self-regulatory skill through observation and emulation. Journal of Educational Psychology 94(4), 660-668.

민주영(Min, Ju Young), 교수(Professor)호서대학교(Hoseo University)충청남도 아산시 배방읍 호서로 79번길 20(20, Hoseo-ro 79, Baebang-eup, Asan-si, Chungcheongnam-do)Tel: 041-540-9730E-mail: jyminkw@gmail.com