The Korean Association for the Study of English Language and Linguistics

Current Issue

Korea Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 21

[ Article ]
Korea Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 21, No. 0, pp.44-55
Abbreviation: KASELL
ISSN: 1598-1398 (Print)
Print publication date 31 Jan 2021
Received 24 Dec 2020 Revised 11 Jan 2021 Accepted 25 Jan 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.21..202101.44

단순 반복학습과 창의적 반복학습의 한국 성인 영어학습자의 어휘학습에 미치는 효과
강동호
서울과학기술대학교

The effects of repetition & generation on Korean EFL adult learners’ vocabulary learning
Dongho Kang
Professor, Dept. of English Language and Literature, Seoul Natl. Univ. of Science and Technology, Tel: 02-970-6250 (dh14kang@seoultech.ac.kr)

© 2021 KASELL All rights reserved
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The study investigated the effects of two kinds of repetitions (retrieval and generation) on Korean adult learners’ vocabulary acquisition. Twenty-eight adult learners in college of lifelong education in Korea were divided into two experimental groups, and further grouped into intermediate and beginner proficiency levels. Both groups listened to the target expressions (Korean and English) before on-line instructions, where they practiced English production of Korean translation. Then the retrieval group was exposed to the same kind of mechanical repetition while the generation group, to the creative use of the expressions in conversation. The ANCOVA statistics showed no significant differences between the two groups in the post-test, but the paired-samples t-tests indicate that the intermediate levels improved between pre-test and post-test more than the beginner levels in Generation (Creative use). The theoretic and pedagogical discussions were made in the conclusion.


Keywords: vocabulary acquisition, retrieval, generation, repetition, lifelong education, EFL

References
1. Candry, S., J. Deconinck and J. Eyckmans. 2018. Written repetition vs. oral repetition: Which is more conducive to L2 vocabulary learning? Journal of the European Second Language Association 2(1), 72-82.
2. De la Fuente, M. J. 2002. Negotiation and oral acquisition of L2 vocabulary: The roles of input and output in the receptive and productive acquisition of words. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(1), 81−112.
3. Eckerth, J. and P. Tavakoli. 2012. The effects of word exposure frequency and elaboration of word processing on incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition through reading. Language Teaching Research 16(2), 227-252.
4. Folse, K. S. 2006. The effect of type of written exercise on L2 vocabulary retention. TESOL Quarterly 40(2), 273−293.
5. Hulstijn, J. H. and B. Laufer. 2001. Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning 51, 539–558.
6. Jiang, N. 2002. Form-meaning mapping in vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(4), 617-637.
7. Jiang, N. 2004. Semantic transfer and its implications for vocabulary teaching in a second language. The Modern Language Journal 88, 416–432.
8. Joe, A. 2010. The quality and frequency of encounters with vocabulary in an English for Academic purposes programme. Reading in a Foreign Language 22(1), 117–138.
9. Keating, G. D. 2008. Task effectiveness and word learning in a second language: The involvement loading hypothesis on trial. Language Teaching Research 12(3), 365-386.
10. Kim, Y. 2011. The role of task-induced involvement and learner proficiency in L2 vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning 61(1), 100-140.
11. Laufer, B. 2013. Lexical thresholds for reading comprehension: What they are and how they can be used for teaching purposes. TESOL Quarterly 47(4), 867-872.
12. Laufer, B. and N. Girsai. 2008. Form-focused instruction in second language vocabulary learning: A case for contrastive analysis and translation. Applied Linguistics 29(4), 694-716.
13. Mondria, J-M. and B. Wiersma. 2004. Receptive, productive, and receptive + productive L2 vocabulary learning: What difference does it make? In P. Bogaards and B. Laufer, eds., Vocabulary in a Second Language, 80-100. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
14. Nation, I. S. P. 2001. Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. Peters, E., J. H. Hulstijn, L. Sercu and M. Lutjeharms. 2009. Learning L2 German vocabulary through reading: The effect of three enhancement techniques compared. Language Learning 59(1), 113-151.
16. Snellings, P., van Gelderen, A. and K. de Glopper. 2002. Lexical retrieval: An aspect of fluent second language production that can be enhanced. Language Learning 52(4), 723−754.
17. Waring, R. and M. Takaki. 2003. At what rate do learners learn and retain new vocabulary from reading a graded reader? Reading in a Foreign Language 15(2), 130–163.
18. Webb, S. 2007a. The effects of repetition on vocabulary knowledge. Applied Linguistics 28(1), 46−65.
19. Webb, S. 2007b. Learning word pairs and glossed sentences: The effects of a single context on vocabulary knowledge. Language Teaching Research 11(1), 63-81.
20. Wolter, B. 2001. Comparing the L1 and L2 mental lexicon: A depth of individual word knowledge model. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23(1), 41-69.
21. Wolter, B. 2006. Lexical network structures and L2 vocabulary acquisition: The role of L1 lexical/conceptual knowledge. Applied Linguistics 27(4), 741-747.