The Korean Association for the Study of English Language and Linguistics

Current Issue

Korea Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 20

[ Article ]
Korea Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 20, No. 1, pp.427-449
Abbreviation: KASELL
ISSN: 1598-1398 (Print)
Print publication date 31 Mar 2020
Received 17 Aug 2020 Revised 13 Sep 2020 Accepted 22 Sep 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.20..202009.427

Negated Fragments: A Direct Interpretation Approach
Jong-Bok Kim
Kyung Hee University


Copyright 2020 KASELL
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Funding Information ▼

Abstract

Fragment answers, involving a type of ellipsis that occurs in answers to questions, appear very frequently in dialogue in varied forms. This paper focuses on negated fragment answers including the negator not. The key question for the analysis of negated fragments (e.g., Not money) is then how to resolve their sentential meaning from incomplete syntax. There have been two main strands: deletion-based sentential and direct interpretation-based non-sentential approaches. The former seeks matching correspondences from the postulation of putative clausal sources and then allows mismatching by deletion processes. Meantime, the latter licences non-correspondences at syntax but achieves the effects of correspondences from the structured discourse interacting with syntax and semantics. This paper offers a direct interpretation approach that can avoid the pitfalls sentential approaches could encounter from the postulation of clausal sources for negated fragments.


Keywords: fragment answer, deletion-based, direct interpretation, negated fragment, discourse-based

Acknowledgments

I thank three anonymous reviewers of this journal for constructive comments. I also thank Jungsoo Kim for feedback on an earlier version. All errors are mine. This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2017S1A2A2041092).”


References
1. Abe, Jun. 2016. Make short answers shorter. Syntax 19, 223-255.
2. Culicover, Peter W. and Ray S. Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Ginzburg, Jonathan. 2012. The Interactive Stance: Meaning for Conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Ginzburg, Jonathan and Ivan A. Sag. 2000. Interrogative Investigations: The Form, Meaning and Use of English Interrogatives (CSLI Lecture Notes 123). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
5. Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof. 1984. Studies on the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NL.
6. Hamblin, Charles. 1973. Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language 10(1), 41-53.
7. Jacobson, Pauline. 2016. The short answer: Implications for direct compositionality (and vice versa). Language 92(2), 331-375.
8. Karttunen, Lauri. 1977. Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 3-44.
9. Kim, Jong-Bok. 2000. The Grammar of Negation: A Constraint-based Approach. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
10. Kim, Jong-Bok. 2015a. Fragments in Korean: A direct interpretation approach. Studies in Generative Grammar 25, 703-733.
11. Kim, Jong-Bok. 2015b. Syntactic and semantic identity in Korean sluicing: A direct interpretation approach. Lingua 166(B), 260-293.
12. Kim, Jong-Bok and Anne Abeillé. 2019. Why-stripping in English. Linguistic Research 36(3), 365-387.
13. Kim, Jong-Bok and Laura A. Michaelis. 2020. Syntactic Constructions in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Kim, Jong-Bok and Joanna Nykiel. 2020. The syntax and semantics of elliptical constructions: A direct interpretation perspective. Linguistic Research 37(2), 223-255.
15. Kim, Jong-Bok and Ivan A. Sag. 2002. Negation without head-movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20(2), 339-412.
16. Klima, Edward S. 1964. Negation in English. In J. A. Fodor & J. J. Katz, eds., The Structure of Language: Readings in the Philosophy of Language, 246-323. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
17. Krifka, Menfred. 2001. For a structured meaning account of questions and answers. In C. Féry and W. Sternefeld, eds., Audiatur vox Sapientiae: A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, 287-320. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
19. Merchant, Jason. 2003. Remarks on Stripping. Ms. University of Chicago.
20. Merchant, Jason. 2004. Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 27, 269-289.
21. Morgan, Jerry. 1973. Sentence fragments and the notion of sentence. In Braj Kachru, Robert Lees, Yakov Malkiel an Angelina Pietrangeli and Sol Saporta, eds., Issues in Linguistics, 719-751. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
22. Sag, Ivan and Joanna Nykiel. 2011. Remarks on sluicing. In Stefan Mülller, ed., Proceedings of the HPSG 11 Conference, 188-208, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
23. Stainton, Robert. 1995. Non-sentential assertions and semantic ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 18, 281-296.
24. Stainton, Robert. 2006. Words and Thoughts: Subsentences, Ellipsis, and the Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Vicente, Luis. 2006. Short negative replies in Spanish. Linguistics in the Netherlands 23, 199-211.
26. Weir, Andrew. 2014. Fragments and Clausal Ellipsis. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, USA.
27. Weir, Andrew. 2020. Negative fragment answers. In Viviane Déprez and M. Teresa Espinal, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Negation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jong-Bok, Kim, ProfessorDepartment of English Linguistics and English LiteratureKyung Hee University26 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, KoreaTel: 02) 961-0892Email: jongbok@khu.ac.kr