The Korean Association for the Study of English Language and Linguistics

Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 21
[Paper List] [Goto Volume List]

[ Article ]
Korea Journal of English Language and Linguistics - Vol. 21, No. 0, pp. 1214-1231
Abbreviation: KASELL
ISSN: 1598-1398 (Print) 2586-7474 (Online)
Received 15 Oct 2021 Revised 15 Dec 2021 Accepted 27 Dec 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.21..202112.1214

Analyzing Speech Rate in CSAT Listening Comprehension: From the Perspectives of Washback Effects and Learning Transfer
Joonwon Lee
Ph.D Candidate, Dept. of English, Arizona State Univ. (jlee540@asu.edu)


© 2021 KASELL All rights reserved
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract

This study aims at investigating the speech rate of CSAT (College Scholastic Ability Test) listening comprehension part, a national university entrance exam. In fact, it is not hard to find Korean EFL learners having difficulties in comprehending authentic speeches, although they learn English in schools for ten years. Among many factors that cause the difficulties, speech rate has been known a factor that affects L2 listening comprehension and CSAT listening comprehension part tends not to reflect the authentic speech rates. Therefore, this study analyzed the speech rate of CSAT listening comprehension. As a result, it was found that CSAT has exposed Korean EFL learners to listening input of which speech rate is comparatively slow, which makes it hard for Korean EFL to develop their ability to comprehend speeches in authentic listening situations. The results suggest that varying the degree of speech rate in CSAT listening comprehension can be a possible solution with the consideration of learning transfer and washback effects of CSAT. Varying degrees of the speech rate in CSAT is expected to provide Korean EFL learners with chances to be exposed to speech rates that they are expected to face in authentic listening situations with washback effects of CSAT. In addition, it will lead Korean EFL learners to be able to comprehend authentic speeches through learning transfer.

Keywords: CSAT listening comprehension, L2 listening comprehension, speech rate, learning transfer, washback effects, L2 listening assessment
Acknowledgments

This study is an updated and extended study based on the author’s master’s thesis.

References
1. Ahn, H. J. 2014. Researching Awareness and Attitudes: A Study of World Englishes and English Teachers in South Korea. Doctoral dissertation, Monash University.
2. Barnett, S. M and S. J. Ceci. 2002. When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin 128(4), 612-637.
3. Blau, E. K. 1990. The effect of syntax, speed, and pauses on listening comprehension. TESOL Quarterly 24(4), 746-753.
4. Bloomfield, A., S. Wayland, E. Rhoades, A. Blodgett, J. Linck and S. Ross. 2010. What makes listening difficult? Factors affecting second language listening comprehension. University of Maryland Center for Advance Study of Language.
5. Bransford, J. D., A. Brown and R. Cocking. (Eds.). 1999. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. National Academies Press.
6. Brown, G. A. 1987. Twenty-five years of teaching listening comprehension. English Teaching Forum 25(4), 11-15.
7. Brown, J. D. 2000. University entrance examinations: Strategies for creating positive washback on English language teaching in Japan. JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter 3(2), 2-7.
8. Chang, A. C.-S. and S. Millett. 2014. The effect of extensive listening on developing L2 listening fluency: Some hard evidence. ELT Journal 68(1). 31-40.
9. Chang, A. C.-S and S. Millett. 2016. Developing L2 listening fluency through extended listening-focused activities in an extensive listening programme. RELC Journal 47(3), 349-362.
10. Choi, I.-C. 2008. The impact of EFL testing on EFL education in Korea. Language Testing 25(1), 39-62.
11. Choi, I.-C. 2010. Impact of varying degrees of English speech rate on listening comprehension. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning 13(1), 99-119.
12. Chou, M.-H. 2017. Impacts of the Test of English Listening Comprehension (TELC) on teachers and teaching in Taiwan. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education 2(5).
13. Detterman, D. K. 1993. The case for the prosecution: Transfer as an epiphenomenon. In D. K. Detterman and R. J. Sternberg, eds., Transfer on Trial: Intelligence, Cognition and Instruction, 1-24. Ablex
14. Field, J. 2009. Listening in the Language Classroom. Cambridge University Press.
15. Fujita, R. 2017. Effects of speech rate and background noise on EFL learners’ listening comprehension of different types of materials. The Journal of Asia TEFL 14(4), 638-653.
16. Goh, C. 1999. How much do learners know about the factors that influence their listening comprehension? Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics 4(1), 17-40.
17. Griffiths, R. 1992. Speech rate and listening comprehension: Further evidence of the relationship. TESOL Quarterly 26(2), 385-390.
18. Green, A. 2013. Washback in language assessment. International Journal of English Studies 13(2), 39-51.
19. Green, R. 2015. Incorporating World Englishes into the Korean EFL classroom. The Journal of Linguistics Science 73, 249-270
20. Hatipoğlu, Ç. 2016. The impact of the university entrance exam on EFL Education in Turkey: Pre-service English language teachers’ perspective. Procedia ̶ Social and behavioral Sciences, 232, 136-144.
21. Herron, C. A and I. Seay. 1991. The effect of authentic oral texts on student listening comprehension in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals 24(6), 487-495.
22. Hong, H. J. 2016. A study on speaking middle school prepare for NEAT, awareness of teachers and students for the writing assessment. Journal of Social Welfare Management 3(1), 153-170.
23. Hughes, A. 2003. Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge University Press.
24. James, M. A. 2008. The influence of perceptions of task similarity/difference on learning transfer in second language writing. Written Communication 25(1), 76-103.
25. James, M. A. 2018. Teaching for transfer of second language learning. Language Teaching 51(3), 330-348.
26. Jin, K., D. Shin and K. Si. 2009. gug-ga-yeong-eo-neung-lyeog-pyeong-ga-si-heom-ui chu-jin hyeon-hwang-gwa bal-jeon-bang-an (Current Status and Development of the National English Ability Test). (Educational Policy Network, OR 2012-02-07) Seoul: Korea, Korean Educational Development Institute & Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. https://www.nl.go.kr/app/nl/search/common/download.jsp?file_id=FILE-00010315622
27. Jung, H. 2006. The washback effects of English listening test in Korean CSAT on secondary school English learning and teaching. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal 16(3), 143-162.
28. Kendall, T. S. 2009. Speech Rate, Pause, and Linguistic Variation: An Examination through the Sociolinguistic Archive and Analysis. Doctoral dissertation, Duke University.
29. Kim, M. 2014. A study on the perceptions of students and teachers about British pronunciation in secondary school listening tests. Teacher Education Research 53(3), 460-473.
30. Kim, Y. S. 2007. Korean Adults’ Attitudes towards Varieties of English. Master’s thesis, University of Edinburgh.
31. Larsen-Freeman, D. 2013. Transfer of learning transformed. Language Learning 63(s1), 107-129.
32. Lee, H.-S. 2019, March 12. il-in-dang sa-gyo-yuk-bi yi-sip-gu-man il-cheon-won ‘yeok-dae choi-go’. yuk-nyun yeon-sok sang-seung (290 thousands won for private education per person, the highest ever. Keeping increasing for 6 years). Yonhapnews. https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20190312050900004?input=1195m
33. Lee, J. 2020. Preparing Korean EFL learners for English Communication with World Englishes and EIL. The Journal of Asia TEFL 17(4), 1310-1322.
34. Lee, J. 2021, June 5. Comparison of the listening comprehension part of national standardized university entrance exams of Asian countries [Conference presentation]. 2021 KASELL Spring Conference on English Linguistics, Seoul, Korea.
35. Lee, J. W. 2016. Analyses of KSAT English Listening Comprehension Focusing on the Speech Rate and Anticipated Effect of WPM Change. Master’s thesis, Korea University.
36. Matsuda, A. 2012. Teaching English as an international language. In A. Matsuda, ed., Principles and Practices for Teaching English as an International Language, 1-14. Multilingual Matters.
37. Moodie, I. and H.-J. Nam. 2016. English language teaching research in South Korea: A review of recent studies (2009-2014). Language Teaching 49(1), 63-98.
38. Morley, J. 2001. Aural comprehension instruction: Principles and practices. In M. Celce Murcia ed., Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 3rd ed., 69-85. Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
39. Onoda, S. 2012. The effect of QuickListens and extensive listening on EFL listening skill development. Extensive Reading World Congress Proceedings 1, 176-179.
40. Osada, N. 2004. Listening comprehension research: A brief review of the past thirty years. Dialogue 3, 53-66.
41. Pan, Y. C. 2009. A review of washback and its pedagogical implications, VNU Journal of Science Foreign Languages 25, 257-263.
42. Park, T and J. Chang. 2016. A study of high school teachers’ opinions about issues of classroom assessment. Secondary English Education 9(4), 95-115.
43. Park, T. 2017. A study on secondary school teachers’ opinions about including British pronunciation in English listening assessment. Secondary English Education 10(3), 3-21.
44. Pimsleur, P., C. Hancock and P. Furey. 1977. Speech rate and listening comprehension. In M. Burt, H. Dulay and M. Finocchiaro, eds., Viewpoints on English as a Second Language, 27-34. Regents.
45. Rader, K. E. 1990. The Effects of Three Different Levels of Word Rate on the Listening Comprehension of Third-quarter University Spanish Learners. Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.
46. Shin, J. 2020, January 27. sa-gyo-yug jul-in-da-myeo do-ib-han yeong-eo jeol-dae-pyeong-ga hag-won-ga-neun mu-pung-ji-dae (Criterion referenced way introduced in order to lessen spending on private education. Controlling private education is impossible). Edaily. https://www.edaily.co.kr/news/read?newsId=01285766625641984&mediaCodeNo=25&OutLnkChk=Y
47. Shohamy, E. 1992. Beyond proficiency testing: A diagnostic feedback testing model for assessing foreign language teaching. The Modern Language Journal 76(4), 513-521
48. Shohamy, E and O. Inbar. 1991. Validation of listening comprehension tests: The effect of text and question type. Language Testing 8(1), 23-40.
49. Thompson, I and J. Rubin. 1996. Can strategy instruction improve listening comprehension?. Foreign Language Annals 29(3), 331-342.
50. Usaha, S and J. Wang. 2002. Impact of China’s national College English Test (CET-4) on ESL Instruction. In G. Lassche, Ed., Proceedings for 10th Annual KOTESOL International Conference. 135-145, KOTESOL.
51. Underwood, M. 1989. Teaching Listening. Longman.
52. Vandergrift, L. 2004. 1. Listening to learn or learning to listen? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 24, 3-25.
53. Vandergrift, L and M. H. Tafaghodtari. 2009. Teaching L2 learners how to listen does make a difference: An empirical study. Language Learning 60(2), 470-497.
54. Whitehead, G. E. K. 2014. High-stakes Testing Washback: Korean High School English Teachers’ Perspectives on the National English Ability Test. Master’s thesis, University of Birmingham.
55. Yeldham, M. 2016. Second language listening instruction: Comparing a strategies-based approach with an interactive, strategies/bottom-up skills approach. TESOL Quarterly 50(2), 394-420.
56. Zeng, Y. 2007. Metacognitive Instruction in Listening: A Study of Chinese Non English Major Undergraduates. Master’s thesis, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University.
57. Zhao, Y. 1997. The effects of listeners’ control of speech rate on second language comprehension, Applied Linguistics 18(1), 49-68.